scholarly journals Methodological Challenges in the Economic Evaluation of a Gene Therapy for RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Disease: The Value of Vision

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-397
Author(s):  
Simone A. Huygens ◽  
Matthijs M. Versteegh ◽  
Stefan Vegter ◽  
L. Jan Schouten ◽  
Tim A. Kanters
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-45
Author(s):  
Aumer Shughoury ◽  
Thomas A. Ciulla ◽  
Benjamin Bakall ◽  
Mark E. Pennesi ◽  
Szilárd Kiss ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matthew P. Simunovic ◽  
Heather G. Mack ◽  
Lauren N. Ayton ◽  
Mark M. Hassall

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuyen Ong ◽  
Mark E. Pennesi ◽  
David G. Birch ◽  
Byron L. Lam ◽  
Stephen H. Tsang

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmina Cehajic Kapetanovic ◽  
Alun R. Barnard ◽  
Robert E. MacLaren

Advances in molecular research have culminated in the development of novel gene-based therapies for inherited retinal diseases. We have recently witnessed several groundbreaking clinical studies that ultimately led to approval of Luxturna, the first gene therapy for an inherited retinal disease. In parallel, international research community has been engaged in conducting gene therapy trials for another more common inherited retinal disease known as choroideremia and with phase III clinical trials now underway, approval of this therapy is poised to follow suit. This chapter discusses new insights into clinical phenotyping and molecular genetic testing in choroideremia with review of molecular mechanisms implicated in its pathogenesis. We provide an update on current gene therapy trials and discuss potential inclusion of female carries in future clinical studies. Alternative molecular therapies are discussed including suitability of CRISPR gene editing, small molecule nonsense suppression therapy and vision restoration strategies in late stage choroideremia.


Eye ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1898-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
J W B Bainbridge

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 7842
Author(s):  
Susanne Kohl ◽  
Britta Baumann ◽  
Francesca Dassie ◽  
Anja K. Mayer ◽  
Maria Solaki ◽  
...  

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is a rare autosomal recessively inherited retinal disease characterized by congenital photophobia, nystagmus, low visual acuity, and absence of color vision. ACHM is genetically heterogeneous and can be caused by biallelic mutations in the genes CNGA3, CNGB3, GNAT2, PDE6C, PDE6H, or ATF6. We undertook molecular genetic analysis in a single female patient with a clinical diagnosis of ACHM and identified the homozygous variant c.778G>C;p.(D260H) in the CNGA3 gene. While segregation analysis in the father, as expected, identified the CNGA3 variant in a heterozygous state, it could not be displayed in the mother. Microsatellite marker analysis provided evidence that the homozygosity of the CNGA3 variant is due to partial or complete paternal uniparental isodisomy (UPD) of chromosome 2 in the patient. Apart from the ACHM phenotype, the patient was clinically unsuspicious and healthy. This is one of few examples proving UPD as the underlying mechanism for the clinical manifestation of a recessive mutation in a patient with inherited retinal disease. It also highlights the importance of segregation analysis in both parents of a given patient or especially in cases of homozygous recessive mutations, as UPD has significant implications for genetic counseling with a very low recurrence risk assessment in such families.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlies Saelaert ◽  
Heidi Mertes ◽  
Tania Moerenhout ◽  
Caroline Van Cauwenbergh ◽  
Bart P. Leroy ◽  
...  

AbstractExome-based testing for genetic diseases can reveal unsolicited findings (UFs), i.e. predispositions for diseases that exceed the diagnostic question. Knowledge of patients’ interpretation of possible UFs and of motives for (not) wanting to know UFs is still limited. This lacking knowledge may impede effective counselling that meets patients’ needs. Therefore, this article examines the meaning of UFs from a patient perspective. A qualitative study was conducted and an interpretative phenomenological analysis was made of 14 interviews with patients with an inherited retinal disease. Patients assign a complex meaning to UFs, including three main components. The first component focuses on result-specific qualities, i.e. the characteristics of an UF (inclusive of actionability, penetrance, severity and age of onset) and the consequences of disclosure; the second component applies to a patient’s lived illness experiences and to the way these contrast with reflections on presymptomatic UFs; the third component addresses a patient’s family embedding and its effect on concerns about disease prognosis and genetic information’s family relevance. The complex meaning structure of UFs suggests the need for counselling procedures that transcend a strictly clinical approach. Counselling should be personalised and consider patients’ lived illness experiences and family context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document