scholarly journals Do Sex Differences in Physiology Confer a Female Advantage in Ultra-Endurance Sport?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Tiller ◽  
Kirsty J. Elliott-Sale ◽  
Beat Knechtle ◽  
Patrick B. Wilson ◽  
Justin D. Roberts ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doreen Kimura ◽  
Brooke N. Seal

Women perform better than men on tests of verbal memory, but the nature of this advantage has not been precisely established. To examine whether phonemic memory is a factor in the female advantage, we presented, along with other verbal memory tasks, one containing nonsense words. Overall, there was the expected female advantage. However, an examination of the individual tests showed female superiority in recall of the real words but not the nonsense words.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Benjamin P. Lange ◽  
Eugen Zaretsky

Abstract For some time now, psycholinguistic research has involved the study of sex differences in language development. Overall, girls seem to have an early advantage over boys, mainly in regard to vocabulary, which appears to decrease and, eventually, vanish with age. While there are numerous studies on sex differences in the acquisition of vocabulary as well as grammar, early sex differences in phonological short-term memory (PSTM) have been mostly neglected, or if research was conducted, it resulted in null findings, for the most part. In the present study, we examined sex differences in language competence (in a wide array of linguistic domains) of German children 4 years of age. Several tests were administered to assess articulation, vocabulary, grammar, speech comprehension, and, most importantly, PSTM (by means of the repetition of non-words and sentences). Girls performed better than boys in all domains, although some effect sizes were small. Most importantly, we found evidence for a female advantage in PSTM performance. Furthermore, mediation analyses revealed that the obtained sex differences in articulation, vocabulary, grammar, and comprehension were partially or fully mediated by (sex differences in) PSTM.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 706-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Berg ◽  
J. K. Enqvist ◽  
C. M. Mattsson ◽  
C. Carlsson-Skwirut ◽  
C. J. Sundberg ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Miles ◽  
Robbin A. Miranda ◽  
Michael T. Ullman

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 649-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsty McNay ◽  
Jane Humphries ◽  
Stephan Klasen

Sex differences in mortality among historical populations are an intriguing yet neglected issue. In mid-nineteenth-century England and Wales, although women and girls enjoyed an overall longevity advantage, they tended to die at higher rates than males at ages when modern life tables show female advantage. We use multilevel modeling to analyze these sex differences in mortality. We identify significant regional variation, related to local demographic conditions, economic structure, and the nature of female employment. But some regional variation remains unexplained, suggesting the need for further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (15) ◽  
pp. 8546-8553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Lemaître ◽  
Victor Ronget ◽  
Morgane Tidière ◽  
Dominique Allainé ◽  
Vérane Berger ◽  
...  

In human populations, women consistently outlive men, which suggests profound biological foundations for sex differences in survival. Quantifying whether such sex differences are also pervasive in wild mammals is a crucial challenge in both evolutionary biology and biogerontology. Here, we compile demographic data from 134 mammal populations, encompassing 101 species, to show that the female’s median lifespan is on average 18.6% longer than that of conspecific males, whereas in humans the female advantage is on average 7.8%. On the contrary, we do not find any consistent sex differences in aging rates. In addition, sex differences in median adult lifespan and aging rates are both highly variable across species. Our analyses suggest that the magnitude of sex differences in mammalian mortality patterns is likely shaped by local environmental conditions in interaction with the sex-specific costs of sexual selection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document