scholarly journals A Synergy Between Peer Evaluation and Student Coaching in Team-Based Learning: Coach Review of Peer Evaluations Improves Student Acceptance

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 597-600
Author(s):  
Thomas Manger ◽  
Christine Thatcher
2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1017-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie K. Zgheib ◽  
Zakia Dimassi ◽  
Imad Bou Akl ◽  
Kamal F. Badr ◽  
Ramzi Sabra

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 676app-676app
Author(s):  
Joy Wahawisan ◽  
Miguel Salazar ◽  
Robin Walters ◽  
Fadi M. Alkhateeb ◽  
Omar Attarabeen

Author(s):  
Venkatesh Venkataramanujam ◽  
Pierre Larochelle

Panther Peer is a novel web based tool for peer evaluation. It has been developed at the Florida Institute of Technology to enable students (specifically those involved in capstone design projects) to give one another anonymous feedback on their team performance. Panther Peer is simple to implement and completely automated. Panther Peer automates the process of peer evaluation and minimizes the workload for both instructors and students. With the benefits of automation students can gain feedback more quickly. Moreover, the reduction in workload for course instructors enables them to encourage peer evaluations. The primary advantage of this system is the feedback students receive from their peers which helps them identify their weaknesses and focus on their strengths. The automated process means that the collection and dissemination of information is highly efficient. From the peer evaluations by students, instructors can have a fair idea about the teams progress and intervene where deemed necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-209
Author(s):  
Olivia S. Anderson ◽  
Noura El Habbal ◽  
Dave Bridges

Peer evaluation skills are not typically taught to students, yet they are expected to provide high-quality feedback to their peers. Gameful learning, a pedagogy supporting student-driven learning, can further reinforce the development of peer evaluation skills, if students are motivated to improve upon them. To better understand the effects of a peer evaluation training on the quality of student-generated peer evaluations, we scored peer evaluations from two cohorts taking a graduate-level nutritional sciences class using gameful learning pedagogy. The intervention group completed a peer evaluation training before engaging in peer reviews, while the control group did not. The training included two readings, a video, and reflection questions. The peer evaluations submitted by both the intervention and control groups were assessed on a validated rubric. The peer evaluation training had a positive effect on the quality of the submitted peer evaluations. The intervention group had a 10.8% higher score on its first submitted peer evaluation compared with controls ( P = 0.003). The intervention group improved the quality of its future submissions by a further 8.9%, whereas the controls did not continue to improve substantially ( P < 0.001). Overall, peer review training enhanced the quality of peer evaluations and allowed students to develop professional skills that they can utilize in any biomedical profession. Our results highlight the importance of peer evaluation training in combination with repeated practice and student-driven learning brought forth by gameful learning pedagogy in improving the quality of evaluations and developing professional skills.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Bae Yoon ◽  
Wan Beom Park ◽  
Sun-Jung Myung ◽  
Sang Hui Moon ◽  
Jun-Bean Park

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Henderson ◽  
Roy Rada ◽  
Chaomei Chen

Classes delivered via the World Wide Web (WWW) have the ability to access large amounts of hypermedia. They can also be designed to present course work in small, orderly steps. Many learning theorists hypothesize that it is important to provide timely feedback which acts as a reinforcer if answers are good and as a corrective measure if answers are inadequate. However, it may not be practical for an instructor to give timely feedback on each submission done by all students in the class. One possible solution is to combine peer-peer evaluations with timely computer generated reports to help the instructor manage such a course. The peer evaluations may replace some or all of the traditional “grading” done by the professor. This process can contribute to higher developmental levels of understanding and students collaborative work skills may be honed by the requirements of the course. We hypothesize that instructors can adopt graphical methods of data presentation and quality improvement to help monitor the peer evaluation process in a timely and adequate fashion. Three such methods were applied to a class at Washington State University. Pseudo R-charts were used to track when comment scores by peers varied widely on an exercise submission. Pseudo X-bar charts helped identify exercise answers with unusually low average comment scores. Finally, relative frequency histograms were used to compare the frequency of questions asked to the frequency of questions answered when categorized using Bloom's taxonomy. Such tools were used during the class and were valuable input to the instructor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (165) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Tom Brown ◽  
Jane Rongerude ◽  
Bruce Leonard ◽  
Laura C. Merrick

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Keselyak ◽  
Cynthia Gadbury-Amyot ◽  
Larry Michaelsen ◽  
Melanie Simmer-Beck

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document