How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort

Background:Sustainability, the ability of drugs to maintain remission or low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), plays a crucial role for the prevention of structural damage to joints and thus, preserving patients’ functional capacity, health-related quality of life and general sense of well-being. Therefore, studying the sustainable effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) as a monotherapy or combined with methotrexate (MTX) is important (1).Objectives:We aimed to examine to what extend TCZ, alone or combined with MTX, could achieve and further sustain LDA in patients with long-standing RA in the light of current, strictly index-based definitions of LDA and to compare the two versions of DAS28 in patients in real clinical practiceMethods:85 RA patients treated with TCZ for at least eighteen months were consecutively enrolled in the present single-center, retrospective cohort study. All participants met the 1987 ACR classification criteria and attended the rheumatology department of University Hospital “St. Marina” Varna in an outpatient setting. Patients receiving pre-filled syringe contained 162 mg TCZ once weekly subcutaneously. Real-world data were extracted and analyzed from patient’s full medical file. For each visit, disease activity score 28 with ESR and CRP (DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) were calculated simultaneously according to generally adopted formulas. A twelve-month result was determined for sustained LDA at each of the patient’s three visits (at 6-month intervals), according to DAS28 and SDAI. Descriptive statistics, Chi square test, Cochran´s Q test, kappa statistic were used, a binary logistics model was compiled to study the impact. Significance level of p <0.05.Results:Two hundred fifty-five patient visits were analyzed. The mean durations of RA and treatment with TCZ were 12.6 (±9.6) years and 3.64 (±1.8) years, respectively. The mean age of patients was 60.3 years (37-87 years), 80% were women, 24.7% were obese, 65.9% have concomitant hypertension. 61.2% of patients are treated with combination therapy TCZ with MTX.Of all patients, these with a sustained 12-month LDA were 41.2%, 28.2% or 23.5% depending on the studied index (DAS28-CRP, SDAI, or DAS28-ESR, respectively).A 12-month SDAI LDA was found in a significantly small proportion of patients (28.2%, p = 0.001). The DAS28 ESR determined a proportion similar to SDAI (23.5%, p> 0.05), while according to the DAS28 CRP, patients with a sustained 12-month LDA were significantly more (41.2% p = 0.005). A moderate level of agreement was found between the assessments of SDAI and the two variants of DAC28 when determining 12-month results of Tocilizumab treatment (DAS28-ESR k = 0.511, p <0.001 and DAC28-CRP k = 0.618, p <0.001). No relationship was found between the combination of TCZ with MTX and the patients’ chance of a sustained 12-month LDA, regardless of which index the result was measured.Patients with hypertension were significantly less likely to have sustained 12-month LDA according to SDAI and DAS 28 ESR (OR 0.135, 95% CI 0.048-0.386; OR 0.313, 95% CI 0.111-0.882, respectively), but not according to DAS28 CRP.Conclusion:Sustained 12- month LDA with TCZ in patients with long-term RA remains uncommon in daily clinical practice. Co-administration of MTX is not associated with an increased likelihood of achieving a sustained LDA in the analysis of long-term responses. Patients with concomitant hypertension are less likely to be in a sustained 12-month LDA, according to SDAI and DAS28-ESR. The results according to DAS28 ESR, but not according to DAS28CRP are comparable to those of SDAI when measuring long-term results of treatment with TCZ.References:[1]Hamann PDH, Pauling JD, McHugh N, Shaddick G, Hyrich K; BSRBR-RA Contributors Group. Predictors, demographics and frequency of sustained remission and low disease activity in anti-tumour necrosis factor-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2162-2169.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

FRI0569 Remission and Low Disease Activity Matrix Tool: Results in Real-World Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients under Golimumab

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.4835 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽

pp. 647.1-647

Author(s):

D. Rosa-Gonçalves ◽

R. Fonseca ◽

F. Aguiar ◽

T. Martins-Rocha ◽

M. Bernardes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Real World ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Activity Matrix

Download Full-text

POS0674 DIRECT COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF TOFACITINIB AND BARICITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN REAL-WORLD SETTINGS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3469 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 581.3-581

Author(s):

N. Iwamoto ◽

T. Suzuki ◽

A. Okada ◽

K. Fujikawa ◽

T. Aramaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Clinical Response ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Real World ◽

Jak Inhibitors ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Significant Difference

Background:Tofacitinib is a non-selective first-generation JAK inhibitor and baricitinib was approved for the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis several years after approve of tofacitinib. Randomized controlled trials have shown good treatment response for RA in these two drugs. However, the evaluation of these two drugs in real-world setting have been rarely reported, moreover, until now, no published data of a direct comparison among JAK inhibitors in RA have been available.Objectives:To compare the efficacy and safety of the JAK inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using propensity score matching in a real-world setting.Methods:A total of 242 patients with RA who were treated with tofacitinib (n=161) or baricitinib (n=81) were enrolled. To avoid confounding, we performed propensity score matching based on multiple baseline characteristic variables, and then 80 baricitinib-treated patients and 57 tofacitinib-treated patients were extracted for the direct comparison. A mixed effect model with a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to ascertain whether there were significant differences in clinical efficacy between the two treatment groups during the treatment period.Finally, We evaluated the predictive factor of clinical responses by performing univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.Results:The mean delta disease activity scores (DAS)28-ESR from baseline to 6 months were −1.60 (tofacitinib) and −1.46 (baricitinib). The remission rate defined by the DAS28-ESR at 24 weeks were 21.1% (tofacitinib) and 25.0% (baricitinib). There was no significant difference in the clinical response between the baricitinib-treated and tofacitinib-treated groups. Although there was no significant difference, the concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX) showed better clinical efficacy in the cases of baricitinib treatment as compared with in the case of tofacitinib treatment. In both groups, the most common AE was herpes zoster infection, and the AE rates were similar between the two groups. However, the predictive factors contributing to clinical response differed. The concomitant use of oral steroid was independently associated with the achievement of DAS-low disease activity in both groups, whereas in the baricitinib group, the number of biological and/or targeted synthetic DMARDs previously used and the DAS28-ESR at the time of initiation were associated with DAS-low disease activity.Conclusion:This study indicate that tofacitinib and baricitinib had comparable efficacies and safety profiles in a real-world setting. However, the influence of clinical characteristics on the treatment response differed between these two drugs. Direct comparison between two JAK inhibitors provide useful information to optimal use of JAK inhibitors in real-world settings.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

FRI0076 Low Disease Activity or DAS-Remission as Treatment Target in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.2715 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽

pp. 454.1-454

Author(s):

G. Akdemir ◽

I.M. Markusse ◽

A.A. Schouffoer ◽

P.B. de Sonnaville ◽

B.A. Grillet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Treatment Target ◽

Low Disease Activity

Download Full-text

POS0305 PHYSICIAN AND PATIENT ATTITUDES TOWARDS TREAT-TO-TARGET, ITS IMPLEMENTATION AND STATED TREATMENT GOALS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING ACROSS EUROPE

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.893 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 378-379

Author(s):

B. Fautrel ◽

R. Caporali ◽

E. Holdsworth ◽

B. Donaghy ◽

M. Khalid ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Real World ◽

Current Treatment ◽

High Disease Activity ◽

Clinical State ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Treatment Goals ◽

Research Support ◽

Reduction Of Pain

Background:The principles of treat to target (T2T) include defining an appropriate treatment target, assessed at pre-defined intervals, with a commitment to changing therapeutic approach if the target is not met (1). T2T is recommended as a key strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Objectives:To explore attitudes towards T2T, its implementation and stated treatment goals among physicians and their patients with RA.Methods:The Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™ was a large, quantitative, point-in-time survey conducted amongst rheumatologists (n=296) and their consulting patients with RA (n=3042) in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) between Q4 2019–Q3 2020. Physicians were recruited via publicly available lists, completing an online survey and medical record extraction for their next 10–12 consecutive patients. The same patients were invited to voluntarily complete a self-report questionnaire (n=1098, 36% response), collecting data on attitudes towards T2T and treatment goals.Results:Physicians reported that 76% of patients were in remission (DAS28: <2.6) or had low disease activity (DAS28: 2.6 – 3.2), and 24% had moderate-high disease activity (DAS28: >3.2). Patient mean age was 53.0 years (SD 14.0), mean time since diagnosis was 7.2 years (SD 7.2). The proportion of patients currently receiving an advanced therapy (AT; defined as biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD) was 68%, of whom 70% were on a first line AT. No difference was observed between disease activity groups.In the physician survey, 86% of physicians stated they followed T2T principals in at least some of their RA patients, and would utilize a T2T approach in RA patients with moderate-high disease activity (61%), the most uncontrolled patients (37%) and those who do not respond well to initial therapy (34%). In this sample of real-world RA patients, 66% were reported by physicians to be on a T2T plan at the time of data collection. The most common physician-reported targets were remission (DAS28: <2.6) (75%), improvement of quality of life (QoL) (41%) and reduction of pain (31%), with 85% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most stated reasons for not implementing T2T was physician preference not to adjust current treatment (34%), patient preference not to adjust current treatment (23%), and there are no achievable goals for this patient (16%).Overall, 29% of patients reported they were involved in setting their T2T goals, while 34% stated their T2T goals were set by their physicians only, and 29% perceived no T2T goal had been set (n=620). The most common overall T2T goals from the patient perspective were remission (61%), controlling symptoms (41%), and reducing impact on QoL (34%). Of those patients who acknowledged a T2T goal had been set (n=407), 77% reported their T2T goal was fully or partially achieved.Of 719 patients who had moderate-high disease activity, 57% were on a T2T plan, with 46% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most common physician-stated reason for not implementing T2T was a lack of achievable targets (29%).Conclusion:Rheumatologists in this study reported a strong belief in T2T. The most common physician-set T2T goals were remission, improvement of QoL and reduction of pain, corresponding with T2T goals as reported by patients. However, a third of patients in this cohort were not aware of a defined T2T objective in their management, which may be a result of a perceived lack of achievable goals by physicians. It may be desirable to promote more patient involvement in defining achievable targets amongst those with moderate-high disease activity who despite best efforts may not reach a clinical state of remission. Further research is needed to identify and understand goals important to RA patients.References:[1]van Vollenhoven R. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis - are we there yet? Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(3):180-6.Acknowledgements:This study was funded by Galapagos NV, Belgium.Medical writing support was provided by Gary Sidgwick, PhD (Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK) and editorial support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), both funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of Interests:Bruno Fautrel Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Sanofi, Fresenius Kabi, Samsung Bioepis, MSD, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Elizabeth Holdsworth Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Bethany Donaghy Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Mona Khalid Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Mark Moore Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Speakers bureau: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Paid instructor for: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Consultant of: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Employee of: Gilead Sciences, and previously Sanofi and AstraZeneca, Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Yves Piette Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Grünenthal and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Mylan and UCB, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grunenthal, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gebro, Janssen, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Jasper Broen Shareholder of: Pharming Group, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Peter C. Taylor Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Fresenius, UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly

Download Full-text

FRI0127 Suppression of radiographic progression after gradual methotrexate tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis patients maintaining low disease activity - Prospective multicenter study-

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1415 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 645.1-645

Author(s):

K. Katayama ◽

K. Yujiro ◽

T. Okubo ◽

R. Fukai ◽

T. Sato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Joint Destruction ◽

Reduction Rate ◽

Bone Destruction ◽

High Response ◽

Continuation Rate ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

One Year ◽

Response Group

Background:Many studies have been reported to reduce/discontinue Biologics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In contrast, study for tapering methotrexate (MTX) has been limited (1,2).Objectives:We prospectively examined whether bone destruction will progress at 48 weeks after tapering or discontinuing MTX (UMIN000028875).Methods:The subjects were RA patients who have maintained low disease activity or lower for 24 weeks or more in DAS28-CRP after MTX administration. Patients having PDUS Grade 2 or 3 per site by bilateral hand ultrasonography (26 area) were excluded in this study owing to risk for joint destruction. The joint destruction was evaluated by the joint X-ray evaluation by modified total Sharp scoring (mTSS) at 1 year after the start of tapering MTX. Evaluation of clinical disease activities, severe adverse events, the continuation rate during MTX tapering were also evaluated. According to tapering response, prognostic factor for good response for tapering, joint destruction was determined. Predictors for successful tapering MTX and progression of bone destruction were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test using SAS .13.2 software.Results:The subjects were 79 (16 males, 63 females). Age average 60.9 years, disease duration 4 years 4 months, MTX dose 8.43 mg / w, DAS28-CRP 1.52, DMARDs (24.3%), ACPA 192.7 U / ml (70.5%), RF 55.6 IU / ml (65.4%).MTX was tapered from an average of 8.43 mg / w before study to 5.46 mg / w one year later. In the treatment evaluation, DAS28-CRP increased from 1.52 to 1.84. 89.7% of subjects did not progress joint damage. Other disease activities significantly increased (Table 1). The one-year continuation rate was 78.2%. Since tapering effects were varied widely, we divided patients into three groups; Flared group (N=14, initial MTX dose 8.71mg/w, final MTX dose 8.42mg/w), Low response group (N=31, final MTX reduction rate< 50%, initial MTX dose 8.93mg/w, final MTX dose 6.22mg/w), High response group (N=34, final MTX reduction rate≥ 50%, initial MTX dose 8.5mg/w, final MTX dose 3.15mg/w)(Table 2).Higher RF value at baseline and higher MTX dose at 3M, 6M were predictors of whether a subject was in Low response group or High Response group. Higher RF value and mTSS at baseline and higher MTX dose at 6M were predictors whether a subject was in Flared group or High response group. Lower age was predictor of whether a subject was in Flared group or Low responder group. Finally, mean ΔmTSS /y in Flared group (0.36) was not significantly higher than in low response group (0.07) and in high response group (0.01).Table 1Table 2.Predictors for successful tapering MTX and progression of bone destructionConclusion:Patients with MTX-administered low disease activity and finger joint echo PDUS grade 1 satisfy almost no joint destruction even after MTX reduction. For tapering, predictors may be helpful for maintaining patient’s satisfaction.References:[1]Baker KF, Skelton AJ, Lendrem DW et al. Predicting drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective interventional cohort study. J. Autoimmunity. 2019;105: 102298.[2]Lillegraven S, Sundlisater N, Aga A et al. Tapering of Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Sustained Remission: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. American College of Rheumatology. 2019; Abstract L08.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

The sFlt-1 to PlGF Ratio in Pregnant Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Impact of Disease Activity and Sulfasalazine Use

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keab372 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Rugina I Neuman ◽

Hieronymus T W Smeele ◽

A H Jan Danser ◽

Radboud J E M Dolhain ◽

Willy Visser

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Gestational Age ◽

Third Trimester ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

The Third ◽

Observational Prospective Cohort Study ◽

Plgf Ratio

Abstract Objectives An elevated sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio has been validated as a significant predictor of preeclampsia, but has not been established in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We explored whether the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio could be altered due to disease activity in RA, and could be applied in this population to predict preeclampsia. Since sulfasalazine has been suggested to improve the angiogenic imbalance in preeclampsia, we also aimed to examine whether sulfasalazine could affect sFlt-1 or PlGF levels. Methods Making use of a nationwide, observational, prospective cohort study on pregnant women with RA, sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured in the third trimester. A total of 221 women, aged 21–42 years, were included, with a median gestational age of 30 + 3 weeks. Results No differences in sFlt-1 or PlGF were observed between women with high, intermediate or low disease activity (p= 0.07 and p= 0.41), whereas sFlt-1 and PlGF did not correlate with DAS28-CRP score (r=-0.01 and r=-0.05, respectively). Four (2%) women with a sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio ≤38 developed preeclampsia in comparison to three (43%) women with a ratio > 38, corresponding to a negative predictive value of 98.1%. Sulfasalazine users (n = 57) did not show altered levels of sFlt-1 or PlGF in comparison to non-sulfasalazine users (n = 164, p= 0.91 and p= 0.11). Conclusion Our study shows that in pregnant women with RA, the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio is not altered due to disease activity and a cut-off ≤38 can be used to exclude preeclampsia. Additionally, sulfasalazine use did not affect sFlt-1 or PlGF levels in this population.

Download Full-text

Switching from TNFα inhibitor to tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in rheumatoid arthritis after achieving low disease activity with TNFα inhibitors and methotrexate: 24-week result from a non-randomized, prospective, active-controlled trial

Arthritis Research & Therapy ◽

10.1186/s13075-021-02566-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sang Youn Jung ◽

Jung Hee Koh ◽

Ki-Jo Kim ◽

Yong-Wook Park ◽

Hyung-In Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Open Label ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Efficacy Analysis ◽

Tnfα Inhibitor

Abstract Background Tapering or stopping biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has been proposed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission, but it frequently results in high rates of recurrence. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) as maintenance therapy in patients with established RA in remission after receiving combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and methotrexate (MTX). Methods This 24-week, prospective, open-label trial included patients who received TNFi and MTX at stable doses for ≥24 weeks and had low disease activity (LDA), measured by Disease Activity Score-28 for ≥12 weeks. Patients selected one of two arms: maintenance (TNFi plus MTX) or switched (TAC plus MTX). The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients maintaining LDA at week 24, which was assessed using a logistic regression model. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study period. Results In efficacy analysis, 80 and 34 patients were included in the maintenance and switched arms, respectively. At week 24, LDA was maintained in 99% and 91% of patients in the maintenance and switched arms, respectively (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–1.59). Drug-related adverse effects tended to be more common in the switched arm than in the maintenance arm (20.9% versus 7.1%, respectively) but were well-tolerated. Conclusion This controlled study tested a novel treatment strategy of switching from TNFi to TAC in RA patients with sustained LDA, and the findings suggested that TNFi can be replaced with TAC in most patients without the patients experiencing flare-ups for at least 24 weeks. Trial registration Korea CDC CRIS, KCT0005868. Registered 4 February 2021—retrospectively registered

Download Full-text

Change in dietary inflammatory index score is associated with control of long-term rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in a Japanese cohort: the TOMORROW study

Arthritis Research & Therapy ◽

10.1186/s13075-021-02478-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yoshinari Matsumoto ◽

Nitin Shivappa ◽

Yuko Sugioka ◽

Masahiro Tada ◽

Tadashi Okano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Quantitative Measure ◽

Inflammatory Change ◽

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Dietary Inflammatory Index ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Inflammatory Index ◽

Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease ◽

Anti Inflammatory

Abstract Background The dietary inflammatory index (DII®), a quantitative measure of the inflammatory potential of daily food and nutrient intake, and associations between a variety of health outcomes have been reported. However, the association between DII score and disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is unclear. Therefore, this study was designed to test whether higher DII score contributes to disease activity and as a corollary, whether reducing DII score helps to achieve or maintain low disease activity or remission in patients with RA. Methods We performed a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis using 6 years of data (from 2011 to 2017) in TOMORROW, a cohort study consisting of 208 RA patients and 205 gender- and age-matched controls started in 2010. Disease activity of RA patients was assessed annually using DAS28-ESR (disease activity score 28 joints and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate) as a composite measure based on arthritic symptoms in 28 joints plus global health assessment and ESR. Dietary data were collected in 2011 and 2017 using the brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ). Energy-adjusted DII (E-DII™) score was calculated using 26 nutrients derived from the BDHQ. Data were analyzed with two-group comparisons, correlation analysis, and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results One hundred and seventy-seven RA patients and 183 controls, for whom clinical and dietary survey data were available, were analyzed. RA patients had significantly higher E-DII (pro-inflammatory) score compared to controls both in 2011 and 2017 (p < 0.05). In RA patients, E-DII score was not a factor associated with significant change in disease activity. However, anti-inflammatory change in E-DII score was associated maintaining low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) or less for 6 years (OR 3.46, 95% CI 0.33–8.98, p = 0.011). Conclusions The diets of RA patients had a higher inflammatory potential than controls. Although E-DII score was not a factor associated with significant disease activity change, anti-inflammatory change in E-DII score appeared to be associated with maintaining low disease activity in patients with RA. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000003876. Registered 7 Aug 2010—retrospectively registered.

Download Full-text

POS0563 THE NATURAL COURSE OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS-ASSOCIATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE FOCUSING ON LUNG PHYSIOLOGY AND DISEASE ACTIVITY: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY (PART 2)

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3084 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 516.1-516

Author(s):

S. H. Chang ◽

J. S. Lee ◽

C. H. Park ◽

M. U. Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Natural Course ◽

Annual Change ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Activity Group ◽

Lung Physiology ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Group D

Background:Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the effect of RA disease activity on the course of ILD is not yet known.Objectives:To assess the natural course of lung physiology of RA-ILD and the relation between arthritis activity and pulmonary physiology in patients with RA-ILD.Methods:The Korean Rheumatoid Arthritis ILd (KORAIL) cohort is the prospective observational cohort and aims to investigate the natural course of RAILD. Based on either 1987 or 2020 ACR criteria, patients diagnosed with RA and ILD based on CT scan were recruited from six tertiary medical hospitals in Korea since January 2015. RA disease activity was assessed using disease activity (DAS)28-ESR and CRP, annually. Pulmonary function tests (PFT), including FVC and DLCO were conducted annually. According to the transition of DAS28-ESR status, we classified patients into four groups: Group A. persistent remission or low disease activity, Group B. improvement, Group C. worsening, Group D. persistent moderate to high disease activity.Results:We analyzed 143 patients who completed a 2-year follow-up (visit 2) or had died with available PFT results at least twice. Mean duration since RA diagnosis and since ILD diagnosis was 7.6±8.0 and 2.7±3.1 years, respectively. Twenty-four patients were Group A, 33 Group B, 10 Group C and 30 Group D. The mean of FVC (mL) and % of the predicted value in FVC was significantly lower in Group D than in other groups (Table 1). The annual rate of decline in FVC was -42 (95% CI -93~10) mL·year-1 in Group B while -113 (95% CI -206~-21) mL·year-1 in Group C (Figure 1A). The annual decline rate in Group C was further exaggerated in patients with ≥ 80% of FVC predicted (-141, 95% CI -251~-32 mL·year-1). During two years of follow-up, patients ever experienced a relative decline of ≥10% from the enrollment in FVC predicted was 27.3%(n-9/33) in Group B whereas 30.0% (3/10) in Group C. The annual rate of decline in % of DLco predicted value was also the largest in Group C (-4.6 %·year-1, 95%CI -8.5~-0.7), which further exaggerated in patients with ≥ 80% of FVC predicted (-4.9%·year-1, 95 %CI -8.3~-1.5, Figure 1B). Of note, about half of patients with maintained not only low disease activity (Group A) but also moderate to severe disease activity (Group D) improved in DLco at least 10% or more from the enrollment of DLco predicted value (Group A: 54.2%, n=13/24, Group D: 46.7%, n=14/30).Conclusion:RA disease activity is associated with the change of lung physiology in patients with RA-ILD; worsening disease activity associated with a further decrease of annual change in FVC and maintaining low disease activity associated with a further increase of annual change in % of DLco predicted value.Table 1.The analysis of forced vital capacity (FVC) according to disease activity transition group.Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DFVC (mL), mean±SD2810.0±771.12528.8±735.32801.0±952.72048.3±575.7FVC % of predicted, mean±SD87.5±14.586.5±16.693.0±15.677.2±17.3Rate of FVC decline, mL·year-1 (95% CI)-52 (-112,7)-42 (-93,10)-113 (-206, -21)1 (-52, 54)A 10-point decline from V1 in predicted FVC value, n (%)29 (20.3)6 (25.0)6 (18.2)3 (30.0)Relative decline of 10% from the enrollment in predicted FVC value, n (%)35 (24.5)5 (20.8)9 (27.3)3 (30.0)Figure 1.The annual change of pulmonary physiology according to disease activity transition group.Acknowledgements:This work was supported by the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no.HI14C1277).Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text