scholarly journals Effectiveness of V-Go® for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Observational Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Grunberger ◽  
Cheryl R. Rosenfeld ◽  
Bruce W. Bode ◽  
Scott D. Abbott ◽  
Carla Nikkel ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Holmes ◽  
Heather Elizabeth Bell ◽  
Karan Bozkurt ◽  
Andrei-Mircea Catarig ◽  
Alice Clark ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001787
Author(s):  
Kohjiro Ueki ◽  
Yukio Tanizawa ◽  
Jiro Nakamura ◽  
Yuichiro Yamada ◽  
Nobuya Inagaki ◽  
...  

IntroductionGiven an increasing use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the real-world setting, we conducted a prospective observational study (Japan-based Clinical Research Network for Diabetes Registry: J-BRAND Registry) to elucidate the safety and efficacy profile of long-term usage of alogliptin.Research design and methodsWe registered 5969 patients from April 2012 through September 2014, who started receiving alogliptin (group A) or other classes of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs; group B), and were followed for 3 years at 239 sites nationwide. Safety was the primary outcome. Symptomatic hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, skin disorders of non-extrinsic origin, severe infections, and cancer were collected as major adverse events (AEs). Efficacy assessment was the secondary outcome and included changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin and urinary albumin.ResultsOf the registered, 5150 (group A: 3395 and group B: 1755) and 5096 (3358 and 1738) were included for safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. Group A patients mostly (>90%) continued to use alogliptin. In group B, biguanides were the primary agents, while DPP-4 inhibitors were added in up to ~36% of patients. The overall incidence of AEs was similar between the two groups (42.7% vs 42.2%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the incidence of cancer was significantly higher in group A than in group B (7.4% vs 4.8%, p=0.040), while no significant incidence difference was observed in the individual cancer. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the imbalanced patient distribution (more elderly patients in group A than in group B), but not alogliptin usage per se, contributed to cancer development. The incidence of other major AE categories was with no between-group difference. Between-group difference was not detected, either, in the incidence of microvascular and macrovascular complications. HbA1c and fasting glucose decreased significantly at the 0.5-year visit and nearly plateaued thereafter in both groups.ConclusionsAlogliptin as a representative of DPP-4 inhibitors was safe and durably efficacious when used alone or with other OHAs for patients with type 2 diabetes in the real world setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hassanein ◽  
Mehmet Akif Buyukbese ◽  
Rachid Malek ◽  
Valérie Pilorget ◽  
Mubarak Naqvi ◽  
...  

Abstract ORION was a prospective, observational study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the second-generation basal insulin analog Gla-300 in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who fast during Ramadan. Adults with T2DM who intended to fast for ≥15 days during Ramadan, had taken Gla-300 for ≥8 weeks prior to inclusion, and intended to continue its use during Ramadan were enrolled in 11 countries. During Ramadan, Gla-300 treatment was adjusted as per routine practice by the treating physician. Overall, the majority of people (402 [85%]) fasted for the entire Ramadan period and 10.8% fasted for ≥25 days but with at least one missed day. Mean (SD) age was 54.4 (11.0) years, 51.7% were male, BMI was 29.7 (5.3) kg/m2, and duration of diabetes was 10.7 (7.0) years. Risks of diabetes-related complications associated with fasting were assessed by physicians according to IDF-DAR fasting risk category; risk was low/moderate in 82.8%, high in 14.3%, and very high in 2.9% of people. The proportion of people with ≥1 severe and/or documented symptomatic (SMPG ≤70 mg/dL) hypoglycemia event was low (2.2% [event rate: 0.021 per participant-month (PPM)] in pre-Ramadan, 2.6% [0.039 PPM] in Ramadan and 0.2% in post-Ramadan [0.003 PPM]). Overall, 0.8% (0.005 PPM) of participants experienced severe and/or documented symptomatic hypoglycemia at SMPG <54 mg/dL, and only during pre-Ramadan. No participants had severe hypoglycemia during Ramadan or post-Ramadan; 1 participant had severe hypoglycemia pre-Ramadan. Most of those who experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia during Ramadan did so during fasting hours (11/13 people). Reductions were shown pre- to post-Ramadan for mean (SD) HbA1c (8.10 % [1.29] pre-Ramadan to 7.64 % [1.05] post-Ramadan; change of −0.44 % [0.97]), FPG (144.3 [45.8] mg/dL pre-Ramadan to 128.5 [37.8] mg/dL post-Ramadan; change of −13.5 [44.1] mg/dL), and fasting SMPG (130.7 [32.9] mg/dL pre-Ramadan to 126.8 [28.5] mg/dL post-Ramadan; change of −3.3 [26.6] mg/dL). Mean Gla-300 dose was reduced slightly between pre-Ramadan and Ramadan (25.6 [11.9] U/0.32 [0.14] U/kg pre-Ramadan to 24.4 [11.5] U/0.30 [0.13] U/kg in Ramadan) and returned to 26.0 (12.2) U/0.32 (0.14) U/kg in the post-Ramadan period. AE incidence was low (5.5%); 3 (0.6%) participants had an AE of hyperglycemia, 2 (0.4%) during Ramadan. In this study, performed in a real-world setting, incidence of hypoglycemia was low in people with T2DM treated with Gla-300 who fasted for Ramadan, with no incidence of severe hypoglycemia during the Ramadan period; HbA1c, FPG and fasting SMPG reductions were also observed. Supported By: Sanofi


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document