Insecticidal and repellent activity of geranium essential oil against Musca domestica and Lucilia cuprina

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1093-1098
Author(s):  
Luana Carvalho Saraiva ◽  
Antônio Francisco Igor Magalhães de Matos ◽  
Luciana Filippin Cossetin ◽  
Jéssica Carla Martins Couto ◽  
Letícia dos Santos Petry ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4 suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 769-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. CANSIAN ◽  
V. ASTOLFI ◽  
R.I. CARDOSO ◽  
N. PAROUL ◽  
S.S. ROMAN ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The aim of this work was to evaluate the insecticidal and repellency activity of the essential oil of Cinnamomum camphora var. linaloolifera Y. Fujita (Ho-Sho) and Cinnamomumcamphora (L.) J Presl.var. hosyo (Hon-Sho), against the Sitophilus zeamais in maize grains. The essential oils were obtained by hydrodistillation and analyzed by GC-MS.The insecticidal activity was determined by the toxicity of different concentrations of essential oils during 24 hours of contact with the insects, in the absence of feed substrate. The Bioassays of repellency were conducted with lethal doses (LD50,LD25,and LD12.5) obtained from insecticidal bioassay. In order to compare the treatments the preference index (PI) was employed. The analysis of the essential oils of Cinnamomum camphora leaves indicated 68% of camphor and 9% of linalool for the variation Hon-Sho and 95% of linalool to the variation Ho-Sho. The variation Ho-Sho presented greatest insecticidal activity than the variation Hon-Sho against the Sitophiluszeamais, with LD50 of 0.35 μL/cm2, whereas in the variation Hon-Sho the ratewas 0.48 μL/cm2. However, considering only the concentrations of linalool and camphor of Ho-Sho and Hon-Sho, the lethal doses’ evaluation of these compounds were similar. The values of the preference index ranged from -0.3 to -0.8 for thevariation Ho-Sho and -0.2 to -0.7 for the variation Hon-Sho. The essential oils evaluated in this work showed repellent activity against Sitophiluszeamais in vitro and in trials performed in mini-silos.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Dietrich ◽  
Marc C. Dolan ◽  
Javier Peralta-Cruz ◽  
Jason Schmidt ◽  
Joseph Piesman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Chaaban ◽  
Vera Maria Carvalho Silva Santos ◽  
Erik Nunes Gomes ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Nogueira Martins ◽  
Wanderlei do Amaral ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T. Nurita ◽  
A. Abu Hassan

AbstractTwo types of municipal solid waste (MSW), newly arrived and 2 weeks old, were sampled from a sanitary landfill in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia at a fortnightly interval and kept under field conditions for 2 weeks. A total of 480 kg of each type of MSW was sampled to study species composition and impact of delays in cover soil applications on filth fly emergence. Out of 960 kg of MSW sampled, 9.2 ± 0.5 flies emerged per kilogram. Weekly adult fly emergence rates of newly arrived and 2-week-old waste did not differ significantly and MSW remained suitable for fly breeding for up to 1 month. Eight species of flies emerged from the MSW: namely, Musca domestica, Musca sorbens, Synthesiomyia nudiseta, Hydrotaea chalcogaster, Chrysomya megacephala, Lucilia cuprina, Hemipyrellia ligurriens and Sarcophaga sp. Newly arrived waste was determined to be the main source for M. domestica, C. megacephala and L. cuprina in the landfill owing to significantly higher mean emergence compared with 2-week-old waste. Musca sorbens was found in newly arrived waste but not in 2-week-old waste, suggesting that the species was able to survive transportation to landfill but unable to survive landfill conditions. Hemipyrellia ligurriens, H. chalcogaster and S. nudiseta were not imported into the landfill with MSW and pre-existing flies in and around the landfill itself may be their source. The results show that landfills can be a major source of fly breeding if cover soil or temporary cover is not applied daily or on a regular schedule.


Data in Brief ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1776-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Chaaban ◽  
Vinicius Sobrinho Richardi ◽  
Alessandra Regina Carrer ◽  
Juliana Sperotto Brum ◽  
Roger Raupp Cipriano ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 1229-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabella Gallardo ◽  
María Inés Picollo ◽  
Gastón Mougabure-Cueto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document