Soft-tissue profile changes in Class II treatment

1977 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Roos
Author(s):  
Izabel Cristina de Mendonça Campos Falcão ◽  
Fabricio Pinelli Valarelli ◽  
Luiz Filiphe Gonçalves Canuto ◽  
Renata Cristina Oliveira ◽  
Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 971-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Hourfar ◽  
Jörg Alexander Lisson ◽  
Ulrich Gross ◽  
Linda Frye ◽  
Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andréa Damasceno ROCHA ◽  
Cleomária Evelyn Vieira Freire CASTELUCI ◽  
Fernando Pedrin Carvalho FERREIRA ◽  
Ana Claudia CONTI ◽  
Marcio Rodrigues ALMEIDA ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Livas ◽  
Nikolaos Pandis ◽  
Johan Willem Booij ◽  
Christos Katsaros ◽  
Yijin Ren

ABSTRACT Objective:  To evaluate the long-term effects of asymmetrical maxillary first molar (M1) extraction in Class II subdivision treatment. Materials and Methods:  Records of 20 Class II subdivision whites (7 boys, 13 girls; mean age, 13.0 years; SD, 1.7 years) consecutively treated with the Begg technique and M1 extraction, and 15 untreated asymmetrical Class II adolescents (4 boys, 11 girls; mean age, 12.2 years; SD, 1.3 years) were examined in this study. Cephalometric analysis and PAR assessment were carried out before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), and on average 2.5 years posttreatment (T3) for the treatment group, and at similar time points and average follow-up of 1.8 years for the controls. Results:  The adjusted analysis indicated that the maxillary incisors were 2.3 mm more retracted in relation to A-Pog between T1 and T3 (β  =  2.31; 95% CI; 0.76, 3.87), whereas the mandibular incisors were 1.3 mm more protracted (β  =  1.34; 95% CI; 0.09, 2.59), and 5.9° more proclined to the mandibular plane (β  =  5.92; 95% CI; 1.43, 10.41) compared with controls. The lower lip appeared 1.4 mm more protrusive relative to the subnasale-soft tissue-Pog line throughout the observation period in the treated adolescents (β  =  1.43; 95% CI; 0.18, 2.67). There was a significant PAR score reduction over the entire follow-up period in the molar extraction group (β  =  −6.73; 95% CI; −10.7, −2.7). At T2, 65% of the subjects had maxillary midlines perfectly aligned with the face. Conclusions:  Unilateral M1 extraction in asymmetrical Class II cases may lead to favorable occlusal outcomes in the long term without harming the midline esthetics and soft tissue profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document