Predicting clinical response to clozapine treatment by plasma level

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 529
Author(s):  
R. Bera ◽  
A.H. Kalali ◽  
B. Gulasekaram ◽  
S. Hayes ◽  
Y. Jin ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lally ◽  
Anne Gallagher ◽  
Emma Bainbridge ◽  
Gloria Avalos ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Honer William ◽  
G. William Macewan ◽  
Lili Kopala ◽  
Siemion Altman ◽  
Sherri Chisholm-Hay ◽  
...  

Objective To study the clinical response to clozapine in patients with refractory schizophrenia. Method Open trial of clozapine in 61 consecutively-treated patients. Results Following clozapine, the level of function of patients was improved relative to admission (p = 0.0001) and to the highest level in the previous year (p = 0.0001). Severity of illness was decreased (p = 0.0001). Overall, 31% of the patients were classified as responders to clozapine and the responders were all identified by 32 weeks of treatment. Poor functioning in the previous year was associated with less favourable response. At a mean interval of 26 months following discharge, 72% of the patients were continuing clozapine treatment. Conclusions This open trial of patients who were treated consecutively indicates a comparable degree of response to clozapine as observed in controlled clinical trials, and that level of functioning in the previous year was the best predictor of response.


1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 651-652
Author(s):  
P.G. Janicak ◽  
J.I. Javaid ◽  
R. Sharma ◽  
A. Leach ◽  
S. Dowd ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.R. De Oliveira ◽  
P.A.S. Do Prado-Lima ◽  
B. Samuel-Lajeunesse

SummaryPart I of this paper presents a comprehensive review of plasma level monitoring of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and their relationship to clinical response to antidepressant therapy. Imipramine, nortriptyline, amitriptyline, clomipramine and desipramine are the most widely studied TCAs in this regard. Typical therapeutic plasma concentration ranges are suggested for some of these agents, although a consensus is lacking.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Dongmi Kim

Abstract Since its initial landmark trial against chlorpromazine in 1988, clozapine has been the drug of choice for the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. However, variability in clinical response to clozapine treatment is unequivocal. In an effort to preselect patients who are most likely to benefit from clozapine, a number of patient and disease variables and select genetic differences have been studied for their association with positive treatment response to clozapine. Because of small trial sizes and the heterogeneity of study design, findings have resulted in no generalizable conclusion. Future pharmacogenetic studies hold the promise of antipsychotic treatment personalization.


1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. JUN ◽  
S. L. HAYES ◽  
J. J. VALLNER ◽  
I. L. HONIGBERG ◽  
A. E. ROJOS ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Bell ◽  
Andrew McLaren ◽  
Jason Gaianos ◽  
David Copolov

Objective: This review examines the evidence supporting the proposition that a threshold clozapine plasma level can predict clinical response. In addition, it provides a brief overview of the pharmacokinetics, side effects, drug interactions and assay methodology of clozapine. Method: A comprehensive search of relevant literature was made with respect to the above criteria. The findings were collated and analysed to produce an overview of the usefulness of using clozapine levels in clinical practice. Results: Most researchers find that, although the correlation between dose of cloza pine and clinical effect is not high, a threshold plasma level of 350–420 ng mL of clozapine is associated with an increased probability of a good clinical response to the drug. Results vary, however, with the study design. Conclusions: The data reviewed present a case for increasing the dose of cloz apine in non-responsive patients to achieve a plasma level of at least 350–420 ng mL−1. Non-response at these levels, however, should not preclude a further upward titration of dose. This should occur unless (i) clinical response is obtained at a lower dose, (ii) intolerable side effects occur, or (iii) a daily dose of 900 mg is reached.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-443

ATYPICAL NEUROLEPTICS HAVE BECOME THE FIRST LINE OF TREATMENT FOR PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS, BUT SOME QUESTIONS REMAIN: what are their optimal dosages and is more medication more efficacious? For clozapine, it is recommended to aim for a plasma level above 350 ng/mL for nonresponders and partial responders. It should be specified that this plasma level should be obtained exactly 12 h after the last dose. For risperidone, optimal daily doses range between 4 and 8 mg, and there is no indication that a higher dose would bring additional improvement. For olanzapine, a quite different situation is encountered. There is a good indication that daily doses of 30 and 40 mg can increase clinical response. It appears that plasma levels above 23 ng/mL may predict response. For quetiapine, reports on the utility of dosages greater than 800 mg/day are anecdotal at this point, and more studies should be conducted. For ziprasidone, dosages above 40 mg/day should be used, but daily doses above 200 mg have not yet been systematically investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document