A correlation between dynamic initiation toughness and crack arrest toughness

1980 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-587
Author(s):  
Jon Lereim
1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Malik ◽  
L. N. Pussegoda ◽  
B. A. Graville ◽  
W. R. Tyson

The awareness of the presence of local brittle zones (LBZs) in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of welds has led to the requirements for minimum initiation (CTOD) toughness for the HAZ for critical applications (API RP 2Z, CSA S473). Such an approach, however, is expensive to implement and limits the number of potential steel suppliers. A fracture control philosophy that is proposed to be an attractive alternative for heat-affected zones containing LBZs is the prevention of crack propagation rather than of crack initiation. Such an approach would be viable if it could be demonstrated that cracks initiated in the LBZs will be arrested without causing catastrophic failure, notwithstanding the low initiation (CTOD) toughness resulting from the presence of LBZs. Unstable propagation of a crack initiating from an LBZ requires the rupture of tougher microstructural regions surrounding the LBZ in HAZ, and therefore the CTOD value reflecting the presence of LBZ is unlikely to provide a true indication of the potential for fast fracture along the heat-affected zone. Base metal specifications (CSA S473) usually ensure that small unstable cracks propagating from the weld zone into the base metal would be arrested. Past work has also shown that unstable crack initiation resulting from interaction of surface semi-elliptical cracks parallel to the fusion boundary with the local brittle zones can get arrested once the crack has popped through the depth of the LBZ. However, the potential for arrest when a through-thickness HAZ crack runs parallel to the fusion boundary, and thus parallel to the LBZs, has not been examined previously. To investigate the likelihood of fast fracture within the HAZ, a test program has been carried out that involved performing compact plane strain (ASTM E1221) and plane stress crack arrest tests on a heataffected zone that contained LBZs, and thus exhibited unacceptable low CTOD toughness for resistance to brittle fracture initiation. The results indicated that in contrast to the initiation toughness (CTOD toughness), the crack arrest toughness was little influenced by the presence of local brittle zones. Instead, the superior toughness of the larger proportion of finer-grain HAZ surrounding the LBZ present along the crack path has a greater influence on the crack arrest toughness. It further seems that there may be potential to estimate the HAZ crack arrest toughness from more conventional smaller-scale laboratory tests, such as conventional or precracked instrumented Charpy impact tests.


Author(s):  
Marjorie EricksonKirk ◽  
Mark EricksonKirk ◽  
Tim Williams

Models to predict the fracture and arrest behavior of ferritic steels, particularly those in use in the nuclear industry, have long been under development. The current, most widely accepted model of fracture toughness behavior is the ASTM E1921-02 “Master Curve” that is used to predict the variation of the mean cleavage fracture toughness with temperature in the transition temperature region as well as predicting the scatter of data about the mean at any given temperature. Recently, models describing the variation of arrest fracture toughness and of ductile initiation toughness with temperature have also been proposed. A study has been conducted with the goal of assessing how the scatter in cleavage initiation toughness may vary with temperature and level of irradiation embrittlement, which utilizes the crack arrest and ductile crack initiation models to redefine limits of applicability of the Master Curve-assumed Weibull distribution by developing empirically-derived interrelationships between the three models. These relationships are expected as all three parameters, KIc, KIa, and JIc, are controlled by the flow behavior of the material. There is a physical basis for viewing the crack arrest toughness as an absolute lower bound to the distribution of crack initiation toughness values for a fixed material condition and temperature. This physically based relationship, borne of the fact that both cleavage crack initiation toughness and cleavage crack arrest toughness are controlled by dislocation mobility, has brought about the suggestion that crack arrest toughness could be used to modify the lower tails of the crack initiation fracture toughness distribution. Using both empirical evidence and a hardening model proposed by Natishan and Wagenhofer, we investigate the relationship between initiation and arrest toughness and the implications on use of toughness models.


Author(s):  
Jessica Taylor ◽  
Philippa Moore ◽  
Ali Mehmanparast ◽  
Rob Kulka

Abstract Modern high Charpy toughness steels can nonetheless show low crack arrest toughness[1]. In this paper, the relationship between initiation and arrest toughness is investigated in five different carbon steels, including S355 structural steels, X65 pipeline steel, and high strength reactor pressure vessel, RPV, steels. The results from small-scale mechanical tests, including instrumented Charpy, drop weight Pellini, fracture toughness, and tensile testing (including STRA in the through-thickness direction) were used to determine the behaviour of the different steels in terms of initiation fracture toughness and crack arrest toughness parameters. There was no correlation between the upper shelf initiation toughness and the arrest toughness when the results from the five steels were collated. The mechanical test results were then correlated to the steels’ microstructural characteristics, including parent metal microstructure, average grain size and grain aspect ratio to identify the relative roles of microstructure and texture in the fracture initiation and arrest performance of carbon steels.


2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 2615-2622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Il Jang ◽  
Baik-Woo Lee ◽  
Jang-Bog Ju ◽  
Dongil Kwon ◽  
Woo-Sik Kim

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Ripling ◽  
P. B. Crosley

1982 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Ripling ◽  
J. H. Mulherin ◽  
P. B. Crosley

Author(s):  
SK Iskander ◽  
RK Nanstad ◽  
MA Sokolov ◽  
DE McCabe ◽  
JT Hutton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document