Repetitive stimulation of optic nerve and lateral geniculate synapses

1959 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 534-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.O. Bishop ◽  
W. Burke ◽  
W.R. Hayhow
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Stimulation Of

Relation of Posttetanic Potentiation to Subnormality of Lateral Geniculate Potentials

1957 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward V. Evarts ◽  
John R. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Posttetanic Potentiation ◽  
Postsynaptic Response ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Decerebrate Cats ◽  
Stimulation Of

The lateral geniculate response to electrical stimulation of the optic nerve was recorded in decerebrate cats and in cats anesthetized with Nembutal. Tetanization of the optic nerve at 500/sec. for 20 seconds in nembutalized cats produced a prolonged second subnormality of the geniculate postsynaptic response. Further tetanization during tetanically-induced second subnormality produced posttetanic potentiation (PTP). The degree of PTP (expressed in percentage of the pretetanic level) of the postsynaptic response following a 20-second tetanus was proportional to the degree of second subnormality present at the time the tetanus was applied. PTP was also found to occur during the subnormality which followed a brief train of optic nerve shocks, and during LSD-induced subnormality. PTP of postsynaptic lateral geniculate potentials occurred only rarely in the absence of some form of intentionally induced subnormality.

scholarly journals Nature of Inhibitory Postsynaptic Activity in Developing Relay Cells of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 1063-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jokūbas Ziburkus ◽  
Fu-Sun Lo ◽  
William Guido
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Inhibitory Response ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Excitatory Responses ◽  
Developing Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

Using intracellular recordings in an isolated (in vitro) brain stem preparation, we examined the inhibitory postsynaptic responses of developing neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the rat. As early as postnatal day (P) 1–2, 31% of all excitatory postsynaptic (EPSP) activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the optic tract was followed by inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs). By P5, 98% of all retinally evoked EPSPs were followed by IPSP activity. During the first postnatal week, IPSPs were mediated largely by GABAA receptors. Additional GABAB-mediated IPSPs emerged at P3–4 but were not prevalent until after the first postnatal week. Experiments involving the separate stimulation of each optic nerve indicated that developing LGN cells were binocularly innervated. At P11–14, it was common to evoke EPSP/IPSP pairs by stimulating either the contralateral or ipsilateral optic nerve. During the third postnatal week, binocular excitatory responses were encountered far less frequently. However, a number of cells still maintained a binocular inhibitory response. These results provide insight about the ontogeny and nature of postsynaptic inhibitory activity in the LGN during the period of retinogeniculate axon segregation.

Post-Tetanic Potentiation in the Visual System of Cats

1956 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Hughes ◽  
Edward V. Evarts ◽  
Wade H. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Concomitant Increase ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Site Of Action ◽  
Probable Site ◽  
Post Tetanic Potentiation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Post-tetanic potentiation (PTP) has been demonstrated in the soma response of the geniculate and in the positive potentials of the cortex by stimulation of the cat's optic nerve and recording from the lateral geniculate and visual cortex. Within limits, an increase in duration and intensity of tetanus produces an increased amount of PTP which lasts for a longer time. Occasionally the tract response is potentiated. Various explanations are offered to account for this change and the results are discussed in relation to the probable site of action of PTP. In any case the type of PTP examined in these experiments using anesthetized animals appears to be a property of the subnormal phase with a concomitant increase in the subliminal fringe.

scholarly journals Synaptic properties of the feedback connections from the thalamic reticular nucleus to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Campbell ◽  
Gubbi Govindaiah ◽  
Sean P. Masterson ◽  
Martha E. Bickford ◽  
William Guido
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Thalamic Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Dependent Form ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Feedback Connections ◽  
Spike Firing ◽  
Stimulation Of

The thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) modulates thalamocortical transmission through inhibition. In mouse, TRN terminals in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) form synapses with relay neurons but not interneurons. Stimulation of TRN terminals in dLGN leads to a frequency-dependent form of inhibition, with higher rates of stimulation leading to a greater suppression of spike firing. Thus, TRN inhibition appears more dynamic than previously recognized, having a graded rather than an all-or-none impact on thalamocortical transmission.

Intracellular analysis of trigeminal motoneuron rhythmical activity during stimulation of pontomedullary reticular formation in anesthetized guinea pig

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1225-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Gurahian ◽  
S. H. Chandler ◽  
L. J. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Membrane Potentials ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Jaw Movements ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Duration Stimulus ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The effects of repetitive stimulation of the nucleus pontis caudalis and nucleus gigantocellularis (PnC-Gi) of the reticular formation on jaw opener and closer motoneurons were examined. The PnC-Gi was stimulated at 75 Hz at current intensities less than 90 microA. 2. Rhythmically occurring, long-duration, depolarizing membrane potentials in jaw opener motoneurons [excitatory masticatory drive potential (E-MDP)] and long-duration hyperpolarizing membrane potentials [inhibitory masticatory drive potentials (I-MDP)] in jaw closer motoneurons were evoked by 40-Hz repetitive masticatory cortex stimulation. These potentials were completely suppressed by PnC-Gi stimulation. PnC-Gi stimulation also suppressed the short-duration, stimulus-locked depolarizations [excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs)] in jaw opener motoneurons and short-duration, stimulus-locked hyperpolarizations [inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs)] in jaw closer motoneurons, evoked by the same repetitive cortical stimulation. 3. Short pulse train (3 pulses; 500 Hz) stimulation of the masticatory area of the cortex in the absence of rhythmical jaw movements activated the short-latency paucisynaptic corticotrigeminal pathways and evoked short-duration EPSPs and IPSPs in jaw opener and closer motoneurons, respectively. The same PnC-Gi stimulation that completely suppressed rhythmical MDPs, and stimulus-locked PSPs evoked by repetitive stimulation to the masticatory area of the cortex, produced an average reduction in PSP amplitude of 22 and 17% in jaw closer and opener motoneurons, respectively. 4. PnC-Gi stimulation produced minimal effects on the amplitude of the antidromic digastric field potential or on the intracellularly recorded antidromic digastric action potential. Moreover, PnC-Gi stimulation had little effect on jaw opener or jaw closer motoneuron membrane resting potentials in the absence of rhythmical jaw movements (RJMs). PnC-Gi stimulation produced variable effects on conductance pulses elicited in jaw opener and closer motoneurons in the absence of RJMs. 5. These results indicate that the powerful suppression of cortically evoked MDPs in opener and closer motoneurons during PnC-Gi stimulation is most likely not a result of postsynaptic inhibition of trigeminal motoneurons. It is proposed that this suppression is a result of suppression of activity in neurons responsible for masticatory rhythm generation.

Proportion of muscles spindles supplied by skeletofusimotor axons (beta-axons) in peroneus brevis muscle of the cat

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1390-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Emonet-Denand ◽  
Y. Laporte
Keyword(s):  
Neuromuscular Junctions ◽  
Muscle Fibers ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Motor Axon ◽  
Dynamic Sensitivity ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Peroneus Brevis ◽  
Stimulation Of

Of 32 cat peroneus brevis spindles, 23 (72%) were found to be supplied by a least 1 skeletofusimotor or beta-axon. A motor axon was identified as skeletofusimotor when repetitive stimulation of it elicited both the contraction of extrafusal muscle fibers and as acceleration of the discharge of primary ending, which persisted after selective block of the neuromuscular junctions of extrafusal muscle fibers. The block was obtained by stimulating single axons at 400-500/s for a few seconds. Of 135 axons supplying extrafusal muscle fibers, 24 (18%) were shown to be beta-axons; 22 beta-axons had conduction velocities ranging from 45 to 75 m/s. All but three beta-axons increased the dynamic sensitivity of primary endings. Beta-innervated spindles may also be supplied by dynamic gamma-axons.

The synaptic organization of optic afferents in the amphibian tectum

1974 ◽  
Vol 187 (1089) ◽  
pp. 421-447 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Cell Layer ◽  
Maximum Amplitude ◽  
Synaptic Organization ◽  
Nerve Fibres ◽  
Synaptic Potentials ◽  
Postsynaptic Cell ◽  
Optic Fibre ◽  
Stimulation Of

Potentials in the amphibian tectum, evoked by stimulation of the optic nerve, were recorded extracellularly. Four discrete potentials, referred to as the m 1 , m 2 , u 1 and u 2 waves, occur at different latencies after stimulation. We have shown that these waves represent summed post-synaptic potentials generated by synchronous activation of four different groups of optic nerve fibres. The m 1 and m 2 waves are generated by two classes of myelinated optic nerve fibres, previously characterized as ‘dimming’ and ‘event’ fibres. The maximum amplitude of the m 2 wave occurs just below, and of the m 2 wave just above, cell layer 8 of P. Ramón. The u 1 and u 2 waves are generated by ‘edge’ and ‘convexity’ fibres, respectively. The maximum amplitude of the u 1 wave occurs near the surface of the tectum, and of the u 2 wave some 100 μm below it. Postsynaptic cell bodies for all four classes of optic fibre are located in layer 8.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document