Trail Making Test Performance in Relation to Certain Experimenter, Test and Subject Variables

1964 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar A. Parsons ◽  
Harriet I. Maslow ◽  
Freda Morris ◽  
J. Peter Denny
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Trail Making Test ◽  
Psychiatric Disturbance ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Subject Variables ◽  
Trail Making ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Order Of Administration

The Trail Making Test, previously reported highly effective in differentiating brain-damaged from non-brain-damaged Ss, was administered to 21 brain-damaged Ss and 63 non-brain-damaged Ss. Since the latter Ss performed at a level indistinguishable from that of the brain-damaged Ss, several studies were designed in an attempt to “explain” the poor performance of the non-brain-damaged Ss. The possible effects of behavioral agitation, anxiety, examiner differences, facility with letters of the alphabet, order of administration, and ego-involvement were investigated. Only anxiety was found to be significantly related to performance. However, in other analyses age, education, vocabulary, and degree of psychiatric disturbance were significantly related to performance. Until these variables are considered in the scoring system, it seems unlikely that the TMT will be effective as a general screening test for brain-damage.

Diagnostic Efficiency of the Trail Making Test as a Function of Cut-off Score, Diagnosis, and Age

1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman G. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Veterans Administration ◽  
Trail Making Test ◽  
Diagnostic Efficiency ◽  
Male Veterans ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Trail Making ◽  
Administration Hospital ◽  
Cutoff Scores ◽  
The Brain

This study is a reinvestigation of the effectiveness of the Trail Making Test in discriminating between brain-damaged ( n = 51) and pseudoneurologic ( n = 72) subjects. All subjects were hospitalized male veterans at the Allen Park Veterans Administration Hospital. An analysis of covariance showed that the pseudoneurologic subjects performed at a significantly higher level than the brain-damaged subjects. Further analysis with two different cutoff scores exhibited unequal discriminatory power throughout the whole range of Trail Making Test scores. These results suggested diagnosing only when the scores were 9 or lower and 13 or higher. This use of extreme scores resulted in an over-all hit rate of 87% in the study. Comparisons with five major subgroupings of the pseudoneurologic subjects yielded only one significant difference: more accurate discrimination with the 12 cut-off score between 10 general-medical and peripheral nerve-damaged subjects (100% correct) and 18 psychotic subjects (39% accuracy).

Performance of Older Japanese American Adults on Selected Cognitive Instruments

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 773-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuko Kemmotsu ◽  
Yurika Enobi ◽  
Claire Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Verbal Learning ◽  
The United States ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Cognitive Test ◽  
Japanese American ◽  
Trail Making Test ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Trail Making ◽  
Fluency Test

AbstractThis study examined cognitive test performance of second- and third-generation Japanese American (JA) adults, a relatively homogeneous Asian American subgroup. Sixty-five JA and 65 non-Hispanic White (NHW) adults, ages between 45 and 91, were administered the Boston Naming Test-2 (BNT), Letter Fluency Test, Semantic Fluency Test, California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R), and Trail Making Test. Levels of acculturation, quality of educational attainment, and generation status in the United States, were also collected. There were no significant differences in the scores between the two groups on the tests administered. JA and NHW groups, however, differed in the patterns of the associations between some of the test performance and demographic variables. JA adults showed a stronger age-score relationship on BNT, CVLT, and the BVMT-R. Furthermore, second-generation JA adults performed lower than the third-generation adults even after controlling for basic demographic variables on CVLT and Trail Making Test. Acculturation on the other hand did not explain score differences once demographic variables were considered. Our results suggest the importance of considering unique history and characteristics of ethnic groups, and interactions of the aging process and culture on tasks with different cognitive demands. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–9)

Heritability of Trail Making Test performance in multiplex schizophrenia families: implications for the search for an endophenotype

2009 ◽  
Vol 259 (8) ◽  
pp. 475-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raúl Mendoza Quiñones ◽  
Yuranny Cabral Calderín ◽  
Mayelin Domínguez ◽  
Tania M. Bravo ◽  
Adnelys Reyes Berazaín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Trail Making Test ◽  
Trail Making

scholarly journals Brazilian norms and effects of age and education on the Hayling and Trail Making Tests

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolle Zimmermann ◽  
Caroline de Oliveira Cardoso ◽  
Christian Haag Kristensen ◽  
Rochele Paz Fonseca
Keyword(s):  
Executive Functions ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Test Time ◽  
Trail Making Test ◽  
Data Reliability ◽  
Trail Making ◽  
Test Errors ◽  
Research Assistants

Abstract Objectives To describe normative data for the Hayling Test and the Trail Making Test (TMT) in a sample of Brazilian adults, and to investigate the effects of age and education on test performance. Method A total of 313 (TMT) and 364 (Hayling) individuals with age ranges of 19-39, 40-59, and 60-75 years, and with at least 5 years of formal education, participated in this study. The tests were administered as part of a large battery of a normative project. Individuals were evaluated individually in silent, ventilated rooms at a university clinic. Instrument protocols were scored by trained research assistants and double-checked to ensure data reliability. Results There were major effects of age on the TMT (Time B, Errors B, B-A) and on the Hayling Test (Errors B/15, B/45), and major effects of education on the TMT (Time B, Errors B, B-A) and on the Hayling Test (Time A, Errors B/15, B/45). Interaction effects were found in Time B and B-A for the Hayling Test and in Time A for the TMT. Conclusions Age and education were critical for performance on both verbal and non-verbal executive functions.

Age Effects on Trail Making Test Performance

1981 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 671-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Age Effects ◽  
Trail Making Test ◽  
Clinical Neuropsychology ◽  
Trail Making ◽  
Correlational Data ◽  
Older Subjects ◽  
Lower Intelligence ◽  
Group Comparisons

The Trail Making Test, used in differentiating brain-damaged from non-brain-damaged individuals, was administered to 150 non-brain-damaged subjects classified into five age decades to determine the effects of age on performance. Between-group comparisons as well as correlational data indicated that older subjects performed significantly more poorly than younger subjects. Significant small negative correlations of performance with education and intelligence suggested that lower intelligence and education also may adversely affect performance. Some implications of these findings for clinical neuropsychology are discussed.

Adaptivity and Judgment in Rule Verification Tasks: An Empirical Investigation

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-285
Author(s):  
Ann M. Bisantz ◽  
Alex Kirlik
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Task Environment ◽  
Verification Task ◽  
Improve Performance ◽  
Impact Performance ◽  
The Poor

Recent studies of decision making have suggested that the poor performance typically demonstrated by traditional decision making research is due not to failures on the part of the human, but failures of the empirical studies to test performance in representative situations. In particular, some researchers have studied how experience in an uncertain environment can improve performance. We describe research designed to test the effect of explicit environmental experience on performance on a rule verification task. Participants performed a rule verification task after receiving related experience in the task environment. Results indicated that performance was very similar to that on traditional tasks of this type, in contrast to research which suggested that knowledge of uncertainty should impact performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document