X-ray diffraction studies of polysaccharide sulphates: Double helix models for κ- and ι-carrageenans

1969 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.S. Anderson ◽  
J.W. Campbell ◽  
M.M. Harding ◽  
D.A. Rees ◽  
J.W.B. Samuel
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10Years) ◽  
pp. 51-73
Author(s):  
Weliton Batiston ◽  
Emanuel Carrilho

Although Linus Pauling had an exceptional scientific contribution to the study of chemical bonds, reported in his book The Nature of Chemical Bond, the lousy image he got for the X-ray diffraction drove him to an unstable structure with an unreal DNA triple helix publication. Oppositely, for the consecration of James Watson & Francis Crick, they had the opportunity to enter science history using the right image of X-ray to propose the famous DNA double helix structure correctly. This chapter of science is an excellent example of how analytical chemistry performance affects horizons and scientific advances. Today the complexity of the systems is more significant and understanding how all proteins truly work into cells and organisms is the current challenge from proteomics. Comprehending how analysis is carried out and how instruments work could promote new insights to improve the analytical performance in proteomics. Here we described an overview based on our expertise on the analytical chemistry toolkit for proteomics analysis: shotgun, bottom-up, middle-down, top-down, and native proteomics, and their inherent instrumentation technologies. In addition, a detailed discussion of the analytical figures of merit in proteomics analysis is provided. We also address the limitations in multidimensional liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry platforms. Furthermore, we present some perspectives in bioinformatics, mathematical modeling simulations, and chemometrics tools, as well.


2021 ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Schindler

This chapter reviews the marked asymmetry exhibited by the Lederberg collaboration. After 1958 when he won the Noble Prize, Joshua’s career took off while Esther’s sharply declined. For the awards ceremonies in Stockholm, Esther was demoted to Nobel wife. Coincidentally, 1958 was the year that Rosalind Franklin died, which disqualified her for sharing the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the DNA double helix. Franklin’s exceptional X-ray diffraction micrographs of DNA provided the critical evidence for Watson and Crick’s chemical model of DNA. In 1947, Gerty and Carl Cori were the first scientific couple to win the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. An exceptional complementarity distinguished the Cori relationship. More often, husband and wife collaborations are asymmetric: for six out of the seven other couples who earned one Nobel Prize, the husband alone received the award. Unlike most of their colleagues, B. O. Dodge congratulated both Lederbergs for achieving together the Nobel Prize.


2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (17) ◽  
pp. 4917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Ferraroni ◽  
Carla Bazzicalupi ◽  
Anna Rita Bilia ◽  
Paola Gratteri

Science ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 233 (4760) ◽  
pp. 195-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mahendrasingam ◽  
V. Forsyth ◽  
R Hussain ◽  
R. Greenall ◽  
W. Pigram ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 455-478
Author(s):  
Struther Arnott ◽  
T.W.B. Kibble ◽  
Tim Shallice

Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins was the ‘Third man of the double helix’ according to the publishers who were allowed to foist this title on his late–written autobiography. Certainly it is for his role in the discovery of the duplex secondary structure of DNA that he will be remembered. It might be argued that he was the first man, rather than the third, for it was his successful revival of X–ray diffraction studies of DNA and their earliest product in 1950, a pattern of a well–oriented and polycrystalline DNA of unprecedented quality, that allowed him to conclude almost immediately that the basic framework of the genetic material was simple and symmetrical, and that the symmetrical structure took the form of a helix. This same pattern, displayed at a conference in Naples six months later, was the major inspiration for the involvement of J. D. Watson (ForMemRS 1981) in modelling DNA structure in collaboration with F. H. C. Crick (FRS 1959). Crick was a personal friend of Maurice's and was more involved with studies of proteins until the progress of Maurice's research programme and Watson's enthusiastic presence in Cambridge convinced him to put nucleic acids first. The carefully crafted citation for the 1960 Lasker Award, which these three men shared in 1960, put Maurice's name first and accurately referred to ‘… the painstaking x–ray diffraction studies of Wilkins that provided a most important clue that was pursued in an ingenious fashion and to a logical conclusion by Crick and Watson…’. Maurice's diffraction studies of DNA were not only the alpha but also the omega of the double helix because it was left to him to remedy a major flaw in the original (1953) Watson–Crick conjecture.


1959 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. Hamilton ◽  
R. K. Barclay ◽  
M. H. F. Wilkins ◽  
G. L. Brown ◽  
H. R. Wilson ◽  
...  

DNA's from diverse cells of different species and from diverse tissues give the same x-ray diffraction pattern. The presently observable structure of DNA appears, then, to be the same in all cells. Thus, DNA in the resting state—the stored genetic material, from sperm of Paracentrotus lividus, Arbacia lixula, and salmon and from T2 and T7 bacteriophage—gives a pattern indistinguishable from DNA from very rapidly dividing cells, e.g., human acute leukemic leukocytes, human leukemic myeloid cells, mouse sarcoma 180, and bacteria—E. coli and pneumococci—during their logarithmic growth. The same x-ray patterns are given by DNA's from more slowly dividing tissues, e.g. calf liver, calf thymus, and human normal and leukemic lymphatic tissue. DNA from chicken erythrocytes—a DNA presumably metabolically inert—gives a similar picture. DNA's from several sources with a wide range in nitrogen base ratios, prepared independently by different workers using various methods, have given final products in varying yield; these all gave the same x-ray pattern, suggesting that all DNA is in the double-helical configuration. Finally, separation of the DNA molecule into a number of fractions with a varying adenine + thymine:guanine + cytosine ratio, but a constant adenine:thymine and guanine:cytosine ratio, each giving the same x-ray pattern as the original whole molecule, suggests that DNA cannot exist in significant amounts in forms other than the double-helix. X-ray diffraction photographs of sperm heads, extracted nucleoprotamine, calf thymus nuclei and extracted nucleohistone, and of chicken erythrocyte nuclei, are not all as well defined as those given by extracted DNA, but it is clear from the general characteristics of the pattern that much of the DNA bound to protein in these nuclei has the usual helical configuration, and that the double-helical structure of DNA exists in the cell and is not an artifact.


1970 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 859-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Murray ◽  
E. M. Bradbury ◽  
C. Crane-Robinson ◽  
R. M. Stephens ◽  
A. J. Haydon ◽  
...  

Histones were completely dissociated from their native complex with DNA in 2.0m-sodium chloride. Histone fractions IIb, V and I were dissociated in 1.2m-sodium chloride, fractions V and I in 0.7m-sodium chloride and fraction I in 0.45m-sodium chloride. Repeated extraction of partial dRNP (deoxyribonucleoprotein) preparations with sodium chloride of the same concentration as that from which they were prepared resulted in release of histones that previously had remained associated with the DNA of the complex. Gradual removal of histones from dRNP was paralleled by an improvement in solubility, a decrease in wavelength of the u.v.-absorption minimum, and a fall in sedimentation coefficient of the remaining partial dRNP. X-ray diffraction patterns of partial dRNP preparations showed that removal of histone fractions I and V from dRNP did not destroy the super-coil structure of the dRNP, but further removal of histones did. Infrared spectra of partial dRNP preparations showed that in native dRNP histone fraction I was present in the form of extended, isolated polypeptide chains, and that the other histone fractions probably contain a helical component that lies roughly parallel to the polynucleotide chains in the double helix and an extended polypeptide component that is more nearly parallel to the DNA helix axis. An analysis of the sedimentation of partial dRNP preparations on sucrose gradients showed that native dRNP consists of DNA molecules each complexed with histone fractions of all types.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document