Parametrial involvement, regardless of nodal status: A poor prognostic factor for cervical cancer

1996 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 741-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
T ZREIK ◽  
J CHAMBERS ◽  
S CHAMBERS
2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 1213-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Takizawa ◽  
S Nakagawa ◽  
K Nakagawa ◽  
T Yasugi ◽  
T Fujii ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Jonska-Gmyrek ◽  
Leszek Gmyrek ◽  
Agnieszka Zolciak-Siwinska ◽  
Maria Kowalska ◽  
Beata Kotowicz

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 546-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Dae Kang ◽  
Cheol Hong Kim ◽  
Moon Kyoung Cho ◽  
Jong Woon Kim ◽  
Hye Yon Cho ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiru Tang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Bing Zhang ◽  
Shiqiu Xiong ◽  
Liangshuai Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Miao ◽  
Wu Qiuji ◽  
Song Congkuan ◽  
Liu Yixin ◽  
Wang Xulong ◽  
...  

Aim: To compare cervical small cell carcinoma (SmCC) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patient characteristics and survival outcomes. Methods: Cervical SmCC and SCC patients in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015 were enrolled. Propensity-score matching analysis (PSM) paired subjects with similar background variables. Cox regression, Kaplan–Meier and stratified analyses were conducted before and after PSM. Results: Cervical SmCC patients showed a higher rate of larger tumor size, advanced grade disease, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). Before and after PSM, SmCC histology and advanced Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (p < 0.001) were principal prognostic factors of survival, and cervical SmCC was associated with worse survival in all stages (stage I–IV). Conclusion: SmCC was an independent poor prognostic factor in cervical cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document