Predictive value of visual evoked potentials in unilateral optic nerve injury

1989 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 339-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Mahapatra ◽  
R. Bhatia
Neuroscience ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Soto ◽  
A.L Pérez-Samartín ◽  
E Etxebarria ◽  
C Matute

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Fahad A Alkherayf ◽  
David Houlden ◽  
Chantal Turgeon ◽  
Charles B Agbi ◽  
Andre Lamothe ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Optic nerve/chiasmal injury is a devastating outcome that may happen during endoscopic surgery. A key goal of endoscopic skull-base surgery is visual improvement. Currently, however, there is limited intraoperative visual pathway monitoring. We examine a novel technique that uses continuous flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs). METHODS Eyes were stimulated by light stimulators (3 LEDs on each side, 640 nm peak wavelength, 10 ms pulse width, 3000 mCd of luminous intensity). Uniform illumination was placed over eyelids. Recording electrodes were placed at Oz-Fz. The filter cuts were = 5 Hz and 100 Hz with amplifier gain 20,000 or 50,000. EEG was recorded. Recordings were correlated to pre and post operative VFs and acuity. Dropping in the FVEP was examined in relation to intraoperative events. A drop of 50% from the base line was considered positive. RESULTS >101 patients had FVEPs in addition to other neurophysiologic monitoring. Patients demographic data, co-morbidities, diagnosis, surgical approach, length of surgery, MAP, and blood loss during surgery were recorded. All patients' visual acuity and field deficits were evaluated by neuro-ophthalmologist before their surgery and within 30 days after surgery. In our cohort, one patient had true positive pre-chiasmatic while another patient had false negative test result. However, the latter patient's deficit was post chiasmatic with no optic nerve or chiasmal injury. Another patient had false positive test (drop of 60%). Eight patients had transient changes related to traction of the chiasm or optic nerves. For predicting optic nerve or chiasmal injury, our study showed sensitivity of 100% (CI2.5-100), specificity of 99% (CI94.5-99.97) and negative predicted value of 100%. CONCLUSION FVEP is reproducible throughout surgery and can predict the post surgical outcome. Additionally, we found that FVEP is transiently affected by different stages of surgery. Further validation is required given the small number of optic/chiasmal injuries in our study.


2020 ◽  
pp. 135245852091792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gorm Pihl-Jensen ◽  
Benedikte Wanscher ◽  
Jette Lautrup Frederiksen

Background: Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) may sometimes be ascertained at the time of optic neuritis (ON) but other times require the advent of new disease activity. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual evoked potential (VEP) measurements of the non-symptomatic, fellow eye of ON patients, for conversion to MS. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study in patients with acute ON. OCT thickness measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCLIPL), and multifocal (mf) VEP and full-field (ff) VEP, were performed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression examined the value of predictors for the conversion to MS. Results: A total of 79 unilateral, acute ON patients, with no MS diagnosis or prior demyelination, were included. Of which, 28 patients developed MS during follow-up. Inferonasal GCLIPL, mean GCLIPL, and pRNFL thickness significantly predicted MS development in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.922–0.939, p = 0.0172–0.021). MfVEP mean latency (HR = 1.052, p = 0.006) only predicted MS conversion in univariate analysis. No significant predictive value was shown for the other parameters ( p > 0.2). Conclusion: While both mfVEP and OCT are useful tools in the evaluation of acute ON patients, only OCT measurements of fellow eyes may serve as an independent predictor of MS development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document