A benefit segmentation of the major donor market

1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne S.P. Cermak ◽  
Karen Maru File ◽  
Russ Alan Prince
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 975-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Oota ◽  
Noritaka Ishihara ◽  
Motoki Nakashima ◽  
Yoichi Kurosawa ◽  
Takuya Hirohashi ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-127
Author(s):  
George Miaoulis ◽  
Robert Corson
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
pp. 128-145
Author(s):  
Joanna Szymoniczek

As far as both humanitarian and development aid are concerned, Germany is a major donor. Involvement in such activity is aimed most of all at building up Germany’s strong position in the international arena, creating a positive image of Germany’s presence abroad, gaining in influence on the formation of a specific world view and of attitudes in the social, political and moral spheres in the recipient countries, and obtaining tangible financial, political and economic benefits. Support from Germany flows to victims of disasters and catastrophes, forgotten armed conflicts and alarming humanitarian problems. To any appeals for assistance, Germany reacts extremely fast. This is possible because of a very efficient system established in the country, comprised of public institutions and non-governmental organisation and with its operations in the international arena regulated in a series of documents. What is characteristic of German aid is the speed with which at arrives to the aggrieved, its adequacy and its subordination to political objectives, particularly in cases of providing aid in armed conflict situations. The fact that Germany is involved, most of all, in bilateral aid operations, which makes it possible to make decisions on her own as to whom to provide with assistance and how, and where, and that, moreover, such assistance is not anonymous, as is the case with the multilateral aid provided by international organisation, which is both more efficient and preferred by its recipients, is evidence of such policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. p145
Author(s):  
Y. Datta

This paper follows the path of seven studies (see below). However, it is different in one important respect: it also offers a benefit segmentation profile of the U.S. Toothpaste Market.Porter associates high market share with cost leadership strategy which is based on the idea of competing on a price that is lower than that of the competition. However, customer-perceived quality—not low cost—should be the foundation of competitive strategy, because it is far more vital to long-term competitive position and profitability than any other factor. So, a superior alternative is to offer better quality vs. the competition.In most consumer markets a business seeking market share leadership should try to serve the middle class by competing in the mid-price segment; and offering quality better than that of the competition: at a price somewhat higher, to signify an image of quality, and to ensure that the strategy is both profitable and sustainable in the long run. Quality, however, is a complex concept that consumers generally find difficult to understand. So, they often use relative price, and a brand’s reputation as a symbol of quality.In 2008 retail sales in the U.S. were $1.27 Billion for the Toothpaste Market. The market leader Crest had a market share of 34.7%, closely followed by Colgate with a share of 33.5%. We focused on the most popular pack-size—5.8-6.5oz—which had a 45.3% share. Employing Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, we tested two hypotheses: (1) That a market leader is likely to compete in the mid-price segment, and (2) That the unit price of the market leader is likely to be somewhat higher than that of the nearest competition. Employing U.S. retail sales data for 2008 and 2007, we found that, for both 2008 and 2007, the market leader in the U.S. Toothpaste market—Crest—was a member of the mid-price segment. Furthermore, the unit price of Crest was somewhat higher than that of Colgate, the runner-up, which was also a member of the mid-price segment.Thus, the results fully supported both Hypothesis I and II—for 2008 and 2007.We also found strong support for the idea, that relative price is a strategic variable, as we have hypothesized.We discovered five benefit segments. The most fundamental result of this analysis is that it revealed an avalanche of various brands of toothpaste that not only whitened teeth, but were also helpful in preventing tooth decay, as before.Finally, we discovered four strategic groups in the industry.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1534-1547
Author(s):  
Eko Supriyanto

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui faktor-faktor manfaat yang diinginkan nasabah tabungan Sikoci pada Bank Nagari BPD Sumatera Barat Cabang Pasar Raya Padang (2) mengetahui bagaimana segmentasi nasabah tabungan Sikoci berdasarkan manfaat tersebut. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada Bank Nagari BPD Sumatera Barat Cabang Pasar Raya Padang dengan menggunakan teknik penarikan sample secara Proportional Accidental Sampling Method. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh nasabah tabungan Sikoci Bank Nagari BPD Sumatera Barat Cabang Pasar Raya Padang yang tersebar di 9 kantor kas di bawah binaan Kantor Cabang Pasar Raya Padang. Jumlah sampel dalam peneltian ini adalah 100 orang nasabah tabungan Sikoci. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis faktor dan dilanjutkan dengan analisis cluster.  Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa diperoleh 8 faktor yaitu faktor pelayanan, faktor penampilan fisik, faktor kualitas produk, faktor insentif promosi, faktor harga, faktor teknologi, faktor lokasi dan faktor kecepatan. Sedangkan dari hasil analisis Cluster ditemukan bahwa terdapat tiga segmen nasabah berdasarkan manfaat yang ingin diperoleh dari tabungan Sikoci. Segmen yang dihasilkan tersebut adalah segmen kualitas produk, insentif promosi dan harga beranggotakan 39% dari responden, pada segmen ini nasabah menginginkan manfaat yang berhubungan dengan pelayanan, teknologi yang digunakan, lokasi bank dan ATM serta kecepatan karyawan. Segmen penampilan fisik beranggotakan 27% dari responden, pada segmen ini nasabah menginginkan manfaat yang erat kaitannya dengan penampilan fisik bank.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juho A. Pesonen

Rural tourism is an important form of tourism in many countries, including Finland. To understand rural tourists’ behaviour and help tourism companies market their products more efficiently many scholars have segmented rural tourists in several different geographical locations. This study aims to combine segmentation approaches used in earlier studies, namely motivation and benefit segmentation, and segment online rural tourists in Finland. Data is collected in a rural tourism affiliate website and analysed using cluster analysis on tourists’ motivations. Among 727 respondents, four rural tourist segments are found: “Social travellers”, “Wellbeing travellers”, “Home region travellers” and “Family travellers”. The segments differ from each other in motivations, preferred destination attributes, travel behaviour and sociodemographic factors. Understanding these differences will provide rural tourism companies important information to successfully market their products by combining both push and pull motivations in their marketing and product development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document