Problem solving in a project environment: A consulting process

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
E.W.F.
2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nita G. Brooks ◽  
Melinda L. Korzaan ◽  
Stoney Brooks

PurposeThis paper builds on previous research in information systems (IS) project management by focusing on key antecedents proposed to play important roles in influencing normative commitment within the IS project environment. The study also further investigates the influence of normative commitment on intentions to continue.Design/methodology/approachTo collect data for this study, a field survey was administered online, and individuals were selected for participation by a member of upper management from Fortune 500 companies located in the United States. Two-hundred and thirty two (232) survey responses were collected. The model was analyzed using PLS-SEM.FindingsThe results indicated that personal investment, personal responsibility, voluntariness, project-specific self-efficacy and problem-solving competency were all significantly related to normative commitment. Project-specific self-efficacy, problem-solving competency and normative commitment directly influenced intention to continue. Additionally, problem-solving competency moderated both the relationships of project-specific self-efficacy to normative commitment and project-specific self-efficacy to intention to continue. The resulting model explains 63% of intention to continue and 58% of normative commitment.Originality/valueThe findings from this study contribute to commitment theory and enhance one’s understanding of IS project environments by exploring specific antecedents related to developing normative commitment. Additionally, the impact of normative commitment on intention to continue was enhanced by examining key moderating relationships to the model.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 92-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitose Furukawa

Purpose – This paper aims to explore the dynamics of critical problem-solving (CPS) project teams and creativity throughout a project’s duration, in a multiple-project environment with consideration of the project’s external factors, such as customer situations. In addition, behavioural elements of the CPS project – multiple team memberships, cross-understanding and the transactive memory system – will be investigated in a multiple-project environment. Design/methodology/approach – This paper investigates the dynamics of a CPS project team and creativity in a global software support organisation by conducting semi-structured interviews in Japan and Germany. There were 53 interviewees in Japan and 51 in Germany. The results presented in this paper show the outcomes of a qualitative study, specifically focusing on the processes of CPS projects using thematic analysis. In the discussion section, propositions are given based on this research’s findings as well as existing literature to denote future research possibilities. Findings – The results of this study suggest that creativity to resolve critical problems in a project team occurs by integrating diverse information and knowledge at multi-level organisational units. They suggest that managerial functions are crucial to determining project composition, and appropriate project environments are created by facilitating multiple team memberships at multi-level organisational units. Originality/value – For the academic domain, the findings have contributed to the fields of project and human resource management, and team management in a multiple-project environment. To practitioners, this study shows the importance of managing multiple projects by considering human behaviour perspectives when solving critical problems.


Author(s):  
A. L. Steele

As part of a new third year project course for the Electrical Engineering program, a reflection journal was introduced as part of the work to be undertaken by students. The aim of the one term course is to provide a project experience that will provide design experience in teams, will draw together material from the previous years of academic study as well as further prepare students for their capstone project. The reflection journal has been introduced to provide a regular opportunity for the student to consciously reflect on their progress, challenges encountered, as well as a way to develop their writing skills. This is an attempt to encourage students to look at the process of learning in a project environment and to develop some degree of metacognition1. By undertaking this type of reflection Cowan [1] suggests that this assists students from looking at solving a particular challenge to generalizing the problem solving process, fitting with the objectives of aproject course. The entries for the journal are weekly and are assessed each week by an instructor and contributed to 15% of the final mark. Because this form of assessment would be new to most of the students instructions were provided including a rubric. These instructions as well asthe instructor’s experiences and opinion of the success of the journal will be presented.


1981 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1047-1048
Author(s):  
J. A. C. C. Watson-Gandy

1981 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1047
Author(s):  
J. A. C. C. Watson-Gandy ◽  
L. Thomas King

1991 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
GT Chiodo ◽  
WW Bullock ◽  
HR Creamer ◽  
DI Rosenstein
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
A. D. Pellegrini

The paper explores the processes by which children use private speech to regulate their behaviors. The first part of the paper explores the ontological development of self-regulating private speech. The theories of Vygotsky and Luria are used to explain this development. The second part of the paper applies these theories to pedagogical settings. The process by which children are exposed to dialogue strategies that help them solve problems is outlined. The strategy has children posing and answering four questions: What is the problem? How will I solve it? Am I using the plan? How did it work? It is argued that this model helps children systematically mediate their problem solving processes.


1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Shapiro ◽  
Nelson Moses

This article presents a practical and collegial model of problem solving that is based upon the literature in supervision and cognitive learning theory. The model and the procedures it generates are applied directly to supervisory interactions in the public school environment. Specific principles of supervision and related recommendations for collaborative problem solving are discussed. Implications for public school supervision are addressed in terms of continued professional growth of both supervisees and supervisors, interdisciplinary team functioning, and renewal and retention of public school personnel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document