Relationship between portal venous flow assessed by doppler us and oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

1989 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. S152
Author(s):  
S. Galani ◽  
S. Li Bassi ◽  
S. Sirinoo ◽  
G. Zironi ◽  
G. Di Febo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Oppenheimer ◽  
Luann Jones ◽  
Ashwani Sharma

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a widely accepted option for treating the complications of portal hypertension. The procedure involves creating a communication between the portal and hepatic venous systems using imaging guidance, thereby diverting the portal venous flow and reducing the portosystemic gradient. However, as with any procedure, TIPS insertion is not without potential complications. We present a case of a 37-year-old female who developed a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm following the placement of a TIPS which was successfully treated with percutaneous thrombin injection.


1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1991-1995
Author(s):  
Hidefumi Baba ◽  
Katsunori Tanaka ◽  
Shigenao Kan ◽  
Fumio Suzuki ◽  
Hitoshi Otaka ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dagenais ◽  
G. Pomier-Layrargues ◽  
B. Rocheleau ◽  
L. Giroux ◽  
P.-M. Huet

1. The systemic and splanchnic haemodynamic effects of pentifylline (40 mg/kg body weight intravenously) were assessed in rats with portal hypertension associated either with CCl4-induced cirrhosis (n= 13) or portal vein ligation (n=13). 2. Heparinized catheters were placed into the portal vein, inferior vena cava, aorta and left ventricle with exits from the neck. Haemodynamic studies were performed 4 h after consciousness was regained. Cardiac output and regional blood flows were measured using radiolabelled microspheres and the reference sample method in seven rats in each group; portal-systemic shunting was measured using microsphere injection in the ileo-colic vein in six rats in each group. 3. Forty-five minutes after injection, pentifylline had no effect on mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, peripheral resistance, portal venous flow, hepatic artery flow or portal-systemic shunting in either group of rats with portal hypertension. The drug lowered portal pressure (−18%) in cirrhotic rats, but not in portal-vein-ligated rats. 4. These data demonstrate that pentifylline lowers portal pressure in cirrhotic rats without affecting portal venous flow and portal-systemic shunting; this effect is possibly mediated by changes in intrahepatic resistance related to the effects of pentifylline on blood viscosity and/or on intrahepatic vasomotor tone.


Author(s):  
Simon Chatelin ◽  
Raoul Pop ◽  
Céline Giraudeau ◽  
Khalid Ambarki ◽  
Ning Jin ◽  
...  

The invasive measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient is still considered as the reference method to assess the severity of portal hypertension. Even though previous studies have shown that the liver stiffness measured by elastography could predict portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease, the mechanisms behind remain today poorly understood. The main reason is that the liver stiffness is not specific to portal hypertension and is also influenced by concomitant pathologies, such as cirrhosis. Portal hypertension is also source of a vascular incidence, with a substantial diversion of portal venous blood to the systemic circulation, bypassing the liver. This study focuses on this vascular effect of portal hypertension. We propose to generate and control the portal venous flow (to isolate the modifications in the portal venous flow as single effect of portal hypertension) in an anesthetized pig and then to quantify its implications on liver stiffness by an original combination of MRE and 4D-Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). A catheter balloon is progressively inflated in the portal vein and the peak flow, peak velocity magnitude and liver stiffness are quantified in a 1.5T MRI scanner (AREA, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). A strong correlation is observed between the portal peak velocity magnitude, the portal peak flow or the liver stiffness and the portal vein intraluminal obstruction. Moreover, the comparison of mechanical and flow parameters highlights a correlation with the possibility of identifying linear relationships. These results give preliminary indications about how liver stiffness can be affected by portal venous flow and, by extension, by hypertension.


Radiology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 202 (3) ◽  
pp. 721-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
E K Paulson ◽  
M A Kliewer ◽  
M G Frederick ◽  
M T Keogan ◽  
D M DeLong ◽  
...  

HPB Surgery ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Jakab ◽  
Z. Ráth ◽  
F. Schmal ◽  
P. Nagy ◽  
J. Faller

Data regarding the afferent circulation of the liver in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma are controversial, we have carried out measurement of hepatic arterial and portal venous flow intraoperatively by transit time ultrasonic volume flowmetry. In patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma the hepatic artery flow increased to 0.55±0.211 compared with the control value of 0.37±0.102 1/min. (p<0.01). The portal venous flow decreased from 0.61±0.212 l/min, to 0.47±l/min. p<0.01). Due to the opposite changes in the afferent circulation the total hepatic blood flow did not change significantly, compared with controls.The ratio of hepatic arterial flow to portal vein flow increased to 1.239±0.246 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which is double of the control value (0.66±0.259 l/min). After resection this ratio did not change.The resection did not alter hepatic artery or portal venous flow significantly, although the total hepatic blood flow decreased significantly (p<0.01).On the basis of our early results it is possible that the ratio of the two circulations may be to deel measured with doppler ultrasound and provide diagnostic information.


2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Soňa Franková ◽  
Jan Šperl

Portal hypertension represents a wide spectrum of complications of chronic liver diseases and may present by ascites, oesophageal varices, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndrome or portopulmonary hypertension. Portal hypertension and its severity predicts the patient‘s prognosis: as an invasive technique, the portosystemic gradient (HPVG – hepatic venous pressure gradient) measurement by hepatic veins catheterisation has remained the gold standard of its assessment. A reliable, non-invasive method to assess the severity of portal hypertension is of paramount importance; the patients with clinically significant portal hypertension have a high risk of variceal bleeding and higher mortality. Recently, non-invasive methods enabling the assessment of liver stiffness have been introduced into clinical practice in hepatology. Not only may these methods substitute for liver biopsy, but they may also be used to assess the degree of liver fibrosis and predict the severity of portal hypertension. Nowadays, we can use the quantitative elastography (transient elastography, point shear-wave elastrography, 2D-shear-wave elastography) or magnetic resonance imaging. We may also assess the severity of portal hypertension based on the non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis (i.e. ELF test) or estimate clinically signifi cant portal hypertension using composite scores (LSPS – liver spleen stiff ness score), based on liver stiffness value, spleen diameter and platelet count. Spleen stiffness measurement is a new method that needs further prospective studies. The review describes current possibilities of the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension and its severity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document