Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Resuscitation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-82
Author(s):  
RV McCloskey ◽  
RC Straube ◽  
C Sanders ◽  
SM Smith ◽  
CR Smith
Author(s):  
Jeremy J Lim ◽  
Sadia Dar ◽  
Dirk Venter ◽  
Juan P Horcajada ◽  
Priya Kulkarni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background MHAA4549A, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the influenza A hemagglutinin stalk, neutralizes influenza A virus in animal and human volunteer challenge studies. We investigated MHAA4549A safety and tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in outpatients with acute, uncomplicated influenza A infection. Methods This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single intravenous (IV) doses of 3600 mg or 8400 mg MHAA4549A, or IV placebo in adult outpatients testing positive for influenza A. Patients were enrolled across 35 sites in 6 countries. Randomization and dosing occurred ≤ 72 hours of symptom onset; study duration was 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was the nature and frequency of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included median time to alleviation of all influenza symptoms, effects on nasopharyngeal viral load and duration of viral shedding, and MHAA4549A serum pharmacokinetics. Results Of 125 randomized patients, 124 received study treatment, with 99 confirmed positive for influenza A by central testing. Frequency of AEs between MHAA4549A and placebo groups was similar; nausea was most common (8 patients; 6.5%). MHAA4549A serum exposure was confirmed in all MHAA4549A-treated patients and was dose proportional. No hospitalizations or deaths occurred. Between MHAA4549A and placebo groups, no statistically significant differences occurred in median time to alleviation of all symptoms, nasopharyngeal viral load, or duration of viral shedding. Conclusions While MHAA4549A was safe and well-tolerated with confirmed exposure, the antibody did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute uncomplicated influenza A infection.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ari Moskowitz ◽  
Lars W. Andersen ◽  
Michael N. Cocchi ◽  
Mathias Karlsson ◽  
Parth V. Patel ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 373-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc E. Rothenberg ◽  
Gerald J. Gleich ◽  
Florence E. Roufosse ◽  
Lanny J. Rosenwasser ◽  
Peter F. Weller

Abstract An international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial has evaluated the effects of mepolizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, on therapeutic prednisone dose requirements, eosinophil levels, signs and symptoms of disease in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). The trial enrolled 85 patients (mean age 48.1 years) with HES (blood eosinophil count >1500/μl with evidence of eosinophil-related organ involvement or dysfunction and no known cause of eosinophilia), who tested negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRα gene rearrangement and required 20–60 mg/day prednisone monotherapy to maintain blood eosinophils at <1000 cells/μL during a run-in period of ≤6 weeks. Patients were randomized to treatment with intravenous mepolizumab 750 mg (n=43) or saline (placebo; n=42) every 4 weeks for 36 weeks (final infusion at Week 32). The prednisone dose was tapered at weekly intervals following the first infusion according to a predefined algorithm based on blood eosinophil counts and HES clinical activity criteria. A total of 84% of patients in the mepolizumab group vs 43% in the placebo group (P<0.001) achieved the primary endpoint (≤10 mg/day prednisone for ≥8 consecutive weeks within the 36-week treatment period). Time to achievement of the primary endpoint, a post-hoc analysis, was significantly shorter in mepolizumab- vs placebo-treated patients (P=0.002). Significantly higher proportions of patients on mepolizumab achieved pre-defined secondary steroid-sparing and eosinophil endpoints vs placebo (Table). Initial assessments of cutaneous disease (based on pruritus visual analog scales and erythema/edema scores) did not differ between the treatment groups. This study, the largest placebo-controlled trial to be conducted in patients with HES to date, has shown that mepolizumab is more effective than placebo at reducing therapeutic prednisone use and stabilizing eosinophil counts in patients with HES. Importantly, a significantly higher proportion of HES patients treated with mepolizumab than placebo achieved the primary endpoint and required ≤10 mg/day prednisone for at least 8 consecutive weeks. These findings indicate that mepolizumab will be an effective therapy for FIP1L1-PDGFRα negative patients with HES. Primary and secondary endpoints Endpoint Placebo (n=42) Mepolizumab (n=43) P-value (95% CI) Patients on ≤10 mg/day prednisone for ≥8 weeks (primary endpoint), % 43% 84% <0.001 (2.69, 23.78) Patients with eosinophils <600 μL for ≥8 weeks, % 45% 95% <0.001 (4.74, 75.17) Primary endpoint in patients on ≤30 mg/day prednisone at baseline, % 57% (n=30) 87% (n=30) 0.011 (1.39, 17.82) Primary endpoint in patients on >30 mg/day prednisone at baseline, % 8% (n=12) 77% (n=13) <0.001 (3.26, 412.26) Patients achieving ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone during the treatment period, % 50% 86% <0.001 (2.04, 15.00) Mean (±SE) prednisone dose at Week 36 (adjusted), mg/day 21.8±1.92 6.2±1.87 <0.001


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document