Steroid-Sparing Effects of Anti-IL-5 Monoclonal Antibody (Mepolizumab) Therapy in Patients with HES: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 373-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc E. Rothenberg ◽  
Gerald J. Gleich ◽  
Florence E. Roufosse ◽  
Lanny J. Rosenwasser ◽  
Peter F. Weller

Abstract An international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial has evaluated the effects of mepolizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, on therapeutic prednisone dose requirements, eosinophil levels, signs and symptoms of disease in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). The trial enrolled 85 patients (mean age 48.1 years) with HES (blood eosinophil count >1500/μl with evidence of eosinophil-related organ involvement or dysfunction and no known cause of eosinophilia), who tested negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRα gene rearrangement and required 20–60 mg/day prednisone monotherapy to maintain blood eosinophils at <1000 cells/μL during a run-in period of ≤6 weeks. Patients were randomized to treatment with intravenous mepolizumab 750 mg (n=43) or saline (placebo; n=42) every 4 weeks for 36 weeks (final infusion at Week 32). The prednisone dose was tapered at weekly intervals following the first infusion according to a predefined algorithm based on blood eosinophil counts and HES clinical activity criteria. A total of 84% of patients in the mepolizumab group vs 43% in the placebo group (P<0.001) achieved the primary endpoint (≤10 mg/day prednisone for ≥8 consecutive weeks within the 36-week treatment period). Time to achievement of the primary endpoint, a post-hoc analysis, was significantly shorter in mepolizumab- vs placebo-treated patients (P=0.002). Significantly higher proportions of patients on mepolizumab achieved pre-defined secondary steroid-sparing and eosinophil endpoints vs placebo (Table). Initial assessments of cutaneous disease (based on pruritus visual analog scales and erythema/edema scores) did not differ between the treatment groups. This study, the largest placebo-controlled trial to be conducted in patients with HES to date, has shown that mepolizumab is more effective than placebo at reducing therapeutic prednisone use and stabilizing eosinophil counts in patients with HES. Importantly, a significantly higher proportion of HES patients treated with mepolizumab than placebo achieved the primary endpoint and required ≤10 mg/day prednisone for at least 8 consecutive weeks. These findings indicate that mepolizumab will be an effective therapy for FIP1L1-PDGFRα negative patients with HES. Primary and secondary endpoints Endpoint Placebo (n=42) Mepolizumab (n=43) P-value (95% CI) Patients on ≤10 mg/day prednisone for ≥8 weeks (primary endpoint), % 43% 84% <0.001 (2.69, 23.78) Patients with eosinophils <600 μL for ≥8 weeks, % 45% 95% <0.001 (4.74, 75.17) Primary endpoint in patients on ≤30 mg/day prednisone at baseline, % 57% (n=30) 87% (n=30) 0.011 (1.39, 17.82) Primary endpoint in patients on >30 mg/day prednisone at baseline, % 8% (n=12) 77% (n=13) <0.001 (3.26, 412.26) Patients achieving ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone during the treatment period, % 50% 86% <0.001 (2.04, 15.00) Mean (±SE) prednisone dose at Week 36 (adjusted), mg/day 21.8±1.92 6.2±1.87 <0.001

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4899-4899
Author(s):  
Gerald J. Gleich ◽  
Lawrence B. Schwartz ◽  
William W. Busse ◽  
Johannes Huss-Marp ◽  
Scott R. Walsh

Abstract Mepolizumab is a humanized anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody that blocks the actions of IL-5, the hematopoietin most responsible for eosinophil production, differentiation, and survival. Clinical experience in small numbers of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), asthma, and atopic dermatitis indicated that intravenous (IV) mepolizumab therapy was associated with a reduction in blood eosinophils and was well-tolerated. A multicenter (26 sites worldwide), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and parallel-group trial has been conducted to evaluate the steroid-sparing effects of mepolizumab in patients with HES, and its efficacy and safety in controlling the signs and symptoms of this disease. The trial recruited patients 18–85 years of age with HES (blood eosinophil count >1500/μl for ≥6 months with evidence of eosinophilia-related organ involvement or dysfunction, without any known cause of eosinophilia), who tested negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRα gene rearrangement and required 20–60 mg/day prednisone (monotherapy) to maintain blood eosinophils at <1000 cells/μL during a stabilization period of up to 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disease control on ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone for ≥8 consecutive weeks during the 36-week treatment period. Here we report the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of trial participants who comprise the largest HES population without the FIP1L1-PDGFRα mutation evaluated to date. Moreover, the clinical spectrum of HES in this population encompassed the multiple varieties of HES currently recognized. Of 107 patients screened, 85 were enrolled, 43 were randomized to mepolizumab (750 mg IV every 4 weeks), and 42 to placebo (saline IV every 4 weeks). No major differences in demographic and disease characteristics were observed between the treatment groups (Table). Many patients (60%) had previously tried and discontinued an HES therapy, notably imatinib mesylate (38%), interferon-α (21%), or hydroxyurea (21%). The most prevalent HES-related medical conditions at baseline were skin (47%) and respiratory (41%) disorders. The primary endpoint was significant in favor of mepolizumab treatment, thus providing evidence that this agent will offer clinical benefits in terms of steroid reduction/sparing in HES. Patient demographics Placebo (n=42) Mepolizumab (n=43) Total (n=85) Age, y (mean±SD) 49.1±14.4 47.0±16.2 48.1±15.3 Men, % 17 (40%) 26 (60%) 43 (51%) Caucasian, % 34 (81%) 38 (88%) 72 (85%) Weight, kg (mean±SD) 79.7±18.3 80.9±22.2 80.3±20.3 BMI, kg/m2 (mean±SD) 27.8±5.8 27.0±6.4 27.4±6.1 Baseline prednisone≤30 mg, n (%) 30 (71%) 30 (70%) 60 (71%) Baseline prednisone >30 mg, n (%) 12 (29%) 13 (30%) 25 (29%) Previously treated for HES, n (%) 40 (95%) 41 (95%) 81 (95%) HES duration, y (mean±SD) 6.5±9.5 4.3±5.6 5.4±7.8 Age at HES onset, y (mean±SD) 42.7±16.2 42.7±17.7 42.7±16.9


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong-Liang Dai ◽  
Yi-Feng Song ◽  
Ya Tian ◽  
Yin Li ◽  
Miao Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Trimetazidine (TMZ) pretreatment protects cardiomyocytes during cardiac surgery. TMZ may protect elderly patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (registration #ChiCTR1900025018) of patients with IHD scheduled to undergo non-cardiac surgery at Shenzhen People’s Hospital (Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China) between June 2014 and September 2015, randomized to 60 mg TMZ or placebo 12 h before surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital cardiovascular events. The secondary endpoints were myocardial ischaemia on five-lead electrocardiogram (cECG), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) elevation, cardiac death, acute coronary events, heart failure, and arrhythmia requiring treatments. Results Compared with the placebo group, the TMZ group showed a lower occurrence of in-hospital cardiovascular events (primary endpoint, 20.0% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.02), myocardial ischaemia (15.0% vs. 32.5%, P < 0.01), cTnI elevation (2.5% vs. 10%, P < 0.01), acute coronary events (10.0% vs. 20.0%, P < 0.05), heart failure (0% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.05), and arrhythmia requiring treatment (17.5% vs. 35.0%, P < 0.05). There was no acute myocardial infarction during the 30-day postoperative period. Conclusions In elderly patients with IHD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, TMZ pretreatment was associated with myocardial protective effects. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=41909 with registration number [ChiCTR1900025018] (7/8/2019).


Author(s):  
Francois-Xavier Lescure ◽  
Hitoshi Honda ◽  
Robert A. Fowler ◽  
Jennifer Sloane Lazar ◽  
Genming Shi ◽  
...  

SummaryBackgroundElevated proinflammatory cytokines have been associated with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severity. We assessed efficacy and safety of sarilumab, an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, in severe (requiring supplemental oxygen by nasal canula or face mask) or critical (requiring greater supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal support) COVID-19.MethodsThis was a 60-day, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial in patients hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and pneumonia, who required oxygen supplementation or intensive care. Patients were randomised 2:2:1 to intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was time to ≥2-point clinical improvement (7-point scale; range: 1 [death] to 7 [not hospitalised]). The key secondary endpoint was proportion of patients alive at day 29. Safety outcomes included adverse events and laboratory assessments. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04327388).FindingsBetween March 28 and July 3, 2020, 420 patients were randomised; 416 received treatment (placebo, n=84; sarilumab 200 mg, n=159; sarilumab 400 mg, n=173). At day 29, there were no significant differences in median (95% CI) time to ≥2-point improvement between placebo (12·0 [9·0–15·0] days) and sarilumab groups (200 mg: 10·0 [9·0–12·0] days, p=0.96, log-rank test; 400 mg: 10·0 [9·0–13·0] days, p=0.34) or in proportions of patients alive (placebo, 91·7%; sarilumab 200 mg, 89·9%, p=0·63; sarilumab 400 mg, 91·9%, p=0·85). At day 29, there were numerical, nonsignificant survival differences between sarilumab 400 mg (88%) and placebo (79%; difference +9%, 95% CI −7·7 to 25·5, p=0·25) for critical patients. There were no unexpected safety signals.InterpretationThis trial did not demonstrate efficacy of sarilumab in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen. Adequately powered trials of targeted immunomodulatory therapies assessing survival as a primary endpoint are suggested in patients with critical COVID-19.FundingSanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document