Appearance of new receptive fields in rat dorsal horn neurons following noxious stimulation of skeletal muscle: a model for referral of muscle pain?

1993 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Hoheisel ◽  
Siegfried Mense ◽  
David G. Simons ◽  
Xian-Min Yu
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Muscle Pain ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

Considerations concerning the neurobiological basis of muscle pain

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 610-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mense
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Muscle Pain ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spinal Reflexes ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurone ◽  
Additional Input ◽  
Degree Of Convergence ◽  
Chronic Muscle Pain ◽  
Stimulation Of

Nociceptors in skeletal muscle can be sensitized by substances that are released from pathologically altered tissue. In the sensitized state, nociceptors can be activated by low-intensity stimulation; this is probably one of the mechanisms producing deep tenderness. Dorsal horn cells processing input from muscle nociceptors often have multiple receptive fields and additional input from other deep tissues or skin. This may be one of the reasons for the diffuse and ill-localized nature of muscle pain. The degree of convergence from deep tissues and skin in neurones with muscle input can be increased by noxious stimulation of deep tissues. This mechanism might explain phenomena such as spread and referral of muscle pain. In the development of chronic muscle pain, vicious circles may be involved which operate locally in the damaged tissue or via spinal reflexes that alter the biochemical environment of the nociceptors in skeletal muscle.Key words: nociceptor, dorsal horn neurone, sensitization, muscle pain, pain referral.

Neuronal and behavioural responses in rats during noxious stimulation of the tail

1977 ◽  
Vol 197 (1127) ◽  
pp. 169-194 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Threshold Temperature ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Ventrobasal Nucleus ◽  
Behavioural Experiments ◽  
Stimulation Of

In rats anaesthetized with urethane, extracellular unit activity has been recorded from neurones in the central nervous system during noxious stimulation of the tail. Accurately graded and sustained stimulation was achieved by immersing the whole tail in water at controlled temperatures. Neurones were found chiefly in the marginal layers of the dorsal horn near the entry of the dorsal roots supplying the tail and in the ventrobasal nucleus of the thalamus; a few neurones were also found in the somatosensory cortex. Both dorsal horn units and thalamic units showed very similar responses as the tail temperature was gradually raised. At 42°C there was an increase in firing rate which rose sharply with increasing temperatures to reach a maximum at 46°C. At higher temperatures activ­ity declined and at temperatures above 50°C was largely extinguished. The temperature-response curves were bell-shaped. The decline in activity depended on temperature and not on time: sustained firing for many minutes was seen when temperature was at or just below the peak of the bell-shaped curve. The dorsal horn and thalamic cells also responded to noxious mechanical stimulation of the tail. The receptive fields at both levels were similar, being variable in size, often bilateral and sometimes covering the whole tail. None of the central neurones showed any response to noxious stimulation other than on the tail; neither did they respond to movement of the tail nor to light mechanical stimuli applied to the tail or elsewhere. In behavioural experiments conscious rats had their tails exposed to water at various temperatures. The rats lifted their tails from the water at a threshold temperature of 43.7 ± 0.6°C, i. e. just above the threshold for the central nociceptive neurones. The findings are compatible with a specific nociceptive pathway ascending to the ventrobasal thalamus.

Developmental Changes in the Fidelity and Short-Term Plasticity of GABAergic Synapses in the Neonatal Rat Dorsal Horn

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 3144-3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Ingram ◽  
Maria Fitzgerald ◽  
Mark L. Baccei
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Neuronal Firing ◽  
Neonatal Rat ◽  
Superficial Dorsal Horn ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
Gabaergic Synapses

The lower thresholds and increased excitability of dorsal horn neurons in the neonatal rat suggest that inhibitory processing is less efficient in the immature spinal cord. This is unlikely to be explained by an absence of functional GABAergic inhibition because antagonism of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptors augments neuronal firing in vivo from the first days of life. However, it is possible that more subtle deficits in GABAergic signaling exist in the neonate, such as decreased reliability of transmission or greater depression during repetitive stimulation, both of which could influence the relative excitability of the immature spinal cord. To address this issue we examined monosynaptic GABAergic inputs onto superficial dorsal horn neurons using whole cell patch-clamp recordings made in spinal cord slices at a range of postnatal ages (P3, P10, and P21). The amplitudes of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were significantly lower and showed greater variability in younger animals, suggesting a lower fidelity of GABAergic signaling at early postnatal ages. Paired-pulse ratios were similar throughout the postnatal period, whereas trains of stimuli (1, 5, 10, and 20 Hz) revealed frequency-dependent short-term depression (STD) of IPSCs at all ages. Although the magnitude of STD did not differ between ages, the recovery from depression was significantly slower at immature GABAergic synapses. These properties may affect the integration of synaptic inputs within developing superficial dorsal horn neurons and thus contribute to their larger receptive fields and enhanced afterdischarge.

Responses of spinal trigeminal neurons to noxious stimulation of paranasal cavities – a rat model of rhinosinusitis headache

Cephalalgia ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 033310242097046
Author(s):  
Michael Koch ◽  
Julika Sertel-Nakajima ◽  
Karl Messlinger
Keyword(s):  
Potassium Chloride ◽  
Dura Mater ◽  
Paranasal Sinuses ◽  
Interstitial Fluid ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Nasal Bone ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Trigeminal Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

Background The pathophysiology of headaches associated with rhinosinusitis is poorly known. Since the generation of headaches is thought to be linked to the activation of intracranial afferents, we used an animal model to characterise spinal trigeminal neurons with nociceptive input from the dura mater and paranasal sinuses. Methods In isoflurane anaesthetised rats, extracellular recordings were made from neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus with afferent input from the exposed frontal dura mater. Dural and facial receptive fields were mapped and the paranasal cavities below the thinned nasal bone were stimulated by sequential application of synthetic interstitial fluid, 40 mM potassium chloride, 100 µM bradykinin, 1% ethanol (vehicle) and 100 µm capsaicin. Results Twenty-five neurons with input from the frontal dura mater and responses to chemical stimulation of the paranasal cavities were identified. Some of these neurons had additional receptive fields in the parietal dura, most of them in the face. The administration of synthetic interstitial fluid, potassium chloride and ethanol was not followed by significant changes in activity, but bradykinin provoked a cluster of action potentials in 20 and capsaicin in 23 neurons. Conclusion Specific spinal trigeminal neurons with afferent input from the cranial dura mater respond to stimulation of paranasal cavities with noxious agents like bradykinin and capsaicin. This pattern of activation may be due to convergent input of trigeminal afferents that innervate dura mater and nasal cavities and project to spinal trigeminal neurons, which could explain the genesis of headaches due to disorders of paranasal sinuses.

Five Sources of a Dorsal Root Potential: Their Interactions and Origins in the Superficial Dorsal Horn

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 860-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Wall ◽  
Malcolm Lidierth
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Superficial Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
Dorsal Roots ◽  
Myelinated Fibers ◽  
Root Potential ◽  
Stimulation Of

Wall, Patrick D. and Malcolm Lidierth. Five sources of a dorsal root potential: their interactions and origins in the superficial dorsal horn. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 860–871, 1997. The dorsal root potential (DRP) was measured on the lumbar dorsal roots of urethan anesthetized rats and evoked by stimulation of five separate inputs. In some experiments, the dorsal cord potential was recorded simultaneously. Stimulation of the L3 dorsal root produced a DRP on the L2 dorsal root containing the six components observed in the cat including the prolonged negative wave (DRP V of Lloyd 1952 ). A single shock to the myelinated fibers in the sural nerve produced a DRP on the L6 dorsal root after the arrival in the cord of the afferent volley. The shape of this DRP was similar to that produced by dorsal root stimulation. Repetitive stimulation of the myelinated fibers in the gastrocnemius nerve also produced a prolonged negative DRP on the L6 dorsal root. When a single stimulus (<5 μA; 200 μs) was applied through a microelectrode to the superficial Lissauer Tract (LT) at the border of the L2 and L3 spinal segments, a characteristic prolonged negative DRP (LT-DRP) began on the L2 dorsal root after some 15 ms. Stimulation of the LT evoked DRPs bilaterally. Recordings on nearby dorsal roots showed this DRP to be unaccompanied by stimulation of afferent fibers in those roots. The LT-DRP was unaffected by neonatal capsaicin treatment that destroyed most unmyelinated fibers. Measurements of myelinated fiber terminal excitability to microstimulation showed that the LT-DRP was accompanied by primary afferent depolarization. Repetitive stimulation through a microelectrode in sensorimotor cortex provoked a prolonged and delayed negative DRP (recorded L2–L4). Stimulation in the cortical arm area and recording on cervical dorsal roots showed that the DRP was evoked more from motor areas than sensory areas of cortex. Interactions were observed between the LT-DRP and that evoked from the sural or gastrocnemius nerves or motor cortex. The LT-DRP was inhibited by preceding stimulation of the other three sources but LT stimulation did not inhibit DRPs evoked from sural or gastrocnemius nerves on the L6 dorsal root or from motor cortex on the L3 root. However, LT stimulation did inhibit the DRP evoked by a subsequent Lissaeur tract stimulus. Recordings were made from superficial dorsal horn neurons. Covergence of input from LT sural, and gastrocnemius nerves and cortex was observed. Spike-triggered averaging was used to examine the relationship between the ongoing discharge of superficial dorsal horn neurons and the spontaneous DRP. The discharge of 81% of LT responsive cells was correlated with the DRP.

A comparative study of the changes in receptive-field properties of multireceptive and nocireceptive rat dorsal horn neurons following noxious mechanical stimulation

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 854-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Laird ◽  
F. Cervero
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Mechanical Stimulus ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
Mechanical Threshold ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation

1. Single-unit electrical activity has been recorded from 42 dorsal horn neurons in the sacral segments of the rat's spinal cord. The sample consisted of 20 multireceptive (class 2) cells with both A- and C-fiber inputs and 22 nocireceptive (class 3) cells. All neurons had cutaneous receptive fields (RFs) on the tail. 2. The RF sizes of the cells and their response thresholds to mechanical stimulation of the skin were determined before and after each of a series of 2-min noxious mechanical stimuli. Up to five such stimuli were delivered at intervals ranging from 10 to 60 min. In most cases, only one cell per animal was tested. 3. The majority of neurons were tested in barbiturate-anesthetized animals. However, to test whether or not this anesthetic influenced the results obtained, experiments were also performed in halothane-anesthetized and decerebrate-spinal preparations. The results from these experiments are considered separately. 4. All of the neurons responded vigorously to the first noxious pinch stimulus and all but one to the rest of the stimuli in the series. The responses of the neurons varied from stimulus to stimulus, but there were no detectable trends in the two groups of cells. 5. The RFs of the class 2 cells showed large increases (624.3 +/- 175.8 mm2, mean +/- SE) after the application of the pinch stimuli. The RFs of the class 3 neurons, which were initially smaller than those of the class 2 cells, either did not increase in size or showed very small increases after the pinch stimuli (38.3 +/- 11.95 mm2, mean +/- SE). 6. Some cells in both groups (6/10 class 2 cells and 7/16 class 3 cells) showed a decrease in mechanical threshold as a result of the noxious mechanical stimulus, but none of the class 3 cells' thresholds dropped below 20 mN into the low-threshold range. 7. The results obtained in the halothane-anesthetized and decerebrate-spinal animals were very similar to those seen in the barbiturate-anesthetized experiments, with the exception that in the decerebrate-spinal animals, the RFs of the class 2 cells were initially larger and showed only small increases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Lateral cervical nucleus in the cat: functional organization and characteristics

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1511-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Craig ◽  
D. N. Tapper
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Receptor Type ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Lateral Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The lateral cervical nucleus (LCN) was investigated with extracellular recordings in the anesthetized cat. A total of 556 LCN units were characterized; the locations of most of these were histologically verified. Half of these had receptive fields on the rostral third of the ipsilateral body surface including the face; 14% had fields on the thorax or abdomen, 33% had fields on the hindlimb or tail, and about 3% had receptive fields larger than one limb. 2. The LCN was observed to be somatotopically organized in experiments using angled microelectrode penetrations. Hindlimb units were dorsolateral, forelimb units ventromedial, and face units most medial within the LCN. In regions where LCN cells were present only in the medial portion of the dorsolateral funiculus, they were all forelimb units. 3. A special subpopulation (17%) of cells were clustered most ventromedially in the LCN. These units had large or disjoint receptive fields, and/or responded to deep, visceral, or noxious stimulation. A third of these did not project in the medial lemniscus (ML); many were synaptically activated by stimulation of the ML. Those that did project in the ML had significantly longer latencies than all other LCN units. It is suggested that this subpopulation contains local LCN interneurons. 4. The specific mechanoreceptor inputs were identified for each of 121 projecting LCN units. Receptor inputs were uniform across each receptive field; that is, each unit that responded to a given receptor type was observed to respond to receptors of that type throughout its receptive field. Input from large-fiber-diameter, velocity-sensitive mechanoreceptors was predominant. The absence of input from slowly adapting type I and II receptors and from joint receptors was confirmed. A significant number of units (17.3%) could be driven by only one receptor type. The LCN sample profile agrees closely with the receptor representation in the hindlimb portion of the spinocervical tract. It is concluded that these data that anatomic specification of convergence occurs in the LCN with respect to receptor connectivity, and that this specification originates in lamina IV of the dorsal horn. 5. Stimulation of the dorsal column nuclei synaptically excited 23% of the LCN units tested. In two cases it was possible to demonstrate, by collision, that this occurred via collaterals of spinocervical tract axons. It is concluded that some spinocervical axons have collaterals terminating in the rostral parts of the dorsal column nuclei.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document