Chronic illness care: An interdisciplinary evaluation and management system for chronic pain based on the biopsychosocial medical model

Pain ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S186
Author(s):  
J. R. Fricton
Author(s):  
Candace Necyk ◽  
Jeffrey A. Johnson ◽  
Ross T. Tsuyuki ◽  
Dean T. Eurich

Background: In 2012, the Government of Alberta introduced a funding program to remunerate pharmacists to develop a comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) for patients with complex needs. The objective of this study is to explore patients’ perceptions of the care they received through the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta. Methods: We invited 3442 patients who received a pharmacist-billed CACP within the previous 3 months and 6888 matched controls across Alberta to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-11), with 3 additional pharmacy-specific assessment questions added. Additional questions related to health status and demographics were also included. Results: Overall, most patients indicated a low level of chronic illness care by pharmacists, with few differences noted between CACP patients and non-CACP controls. Of note, controls reported higher quality of care for 5 domains within the adapted PACIC-like tool compared with CACP patients ( p < 0.05 for all). Interestingly, only 79 (44%) of CACP patients reported that they had received a CACP, whereas only 192 (66%) of control patients reported that they did not receive a care plan. In a sensitivity analysis including only these respondents, individuals who received a CACP perceived a significantly higher quality of chronic illness care across all PACIC domains. Conclusion: Overall, chronic illness care incentivized by the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta is perceived to be moderate to low. When limited to respondents who explicitly recognized receiving the service or not, the perceptions of quality of care were more positive. This suggests that better implementation of CACP by pharmacists may be associated with improved quality of care and that some redesign is needed to engage patients more. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 916-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Desmedt ◽  
Mirko Petrovic ◽  
Jochen Bergs ◽  
Dominique Vandijck ◽  
Hubertus Vrijhoef ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Russell ◽  
P. Thille ◽  
W. Hogg ◽  
J. Lemelin

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Fernández Silva ◽  
Betty Antiñirre Mansilla ◽  
Viviana Carolina De La Hoz Chávez

Introducción: La diabetes mellitus es un problema de salud pública que ocasiona afecciones biopsicosociales en los individuos que la padecen, conllevando a la necesidad de valorar aspectos que pueden incidir en su compensación tal como la autoeficacia y la satisfacción usuaria. Materiales y métodos: Se desarrolló una investigación cuantitativa de tipo correlacional que tuvo como referente el Modelo de Promoción de la Salud, y que incluyó  por muestreo aleatorio simple a 86 individuos con diabetes mellitus tipo 2, en quienes se pudo establecer su perfil, percepción de autoeficacia y satisfacción usuaria  a través del instrumento para la evaluación de autoeficacia en Diabetes tipo 2 (alfa de Cronbach de 0,85) y el PACIC(Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care) (alfa de Cronbach de 0,88). Resultados: Los usuarios en su mayoría son mujeres (65%), en etapa de adulto medio (65,1%), se perciben como autoeficaces(82,6%) y muestran satisfacción por el servicio ofrecido(76,7%), presentando descompensación metabólica (57%). Se pudo apreciar asociación entre la autoeficacia y el grupo etario (p=0,002), contar con pareja (p=0,029), la hemoglobina glicosilada (p=0,007) y el estado cognitivo de los adultos mayores (p=0,017), al igual que entre la satisfacción y el grupo etario (p=0,033), el sexo (<0,001), y la situación laboral (p=0,005). Discusión: El perfil establecido coincide con el reportado en otras publicaciones. La autoeficacia y satisfacción usuaria son aspectos que se relacionan con la compensación de los usuarios. Conclusiones: Se requiere potenciar aspectos como la autoeficacia y la satisfacción usuaria,  siendo pertinente la aplicación del Modelo de Promoción de la Salud. Como citar este artículo: Fernández-Silva Carlos Alberto, Antiñirre Mansilla Betty, De La Hoz Chávez Viviana Carolina. Autoeficacia y satisfacción de los usuarios con diabetes tipo 2 de un centro de salud chileno. Revista Cuidarte. 2020; 11(2): e933. http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.933


2019 ◽  
pp. 73-75
Author(s):  
Rosana Tieka Miyazaki Brancucci ◽  
Marcio Lima Pontes Natan ◽  
Aline Vitali da Silva ◽  
Arao Belitardo de Oliveira ◽  
Juliane Prieto Peres Mercante

Cultural diversity limits cross cultural understanding of diseases. Stigma has been studied in neurological disorders, chronic pain and migraine, but instruments are not available in Portuguese. We aimed to translate the 8-item Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness to Portuguese. Methods: We followed the 5 steps advised by guidelines for transcultural validation. Results: Translation, backtranslation and cultural validation has been performed following the 5 steps, and a final version of the instrument was achieved. Discussion/Conclusion : Stigma is an important issue in migraine management. Measurement of stigma in headache sufferers in Brazil may be started. The final version of the instrument is provided.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell E. Glasgow ◽  
Edward H. Wagner ◽  
Judith Schaefer ◽  
Lisa D. Mahoney ◽  
Robert J. Reid ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document