Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies

2018 ◽  
pp. 211-221
Author(s):  
Anne Y. Liu
Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Francesca Mori ◽  
Francesca Saretta ◽  
Annamaria Bianchi ◽  
Giuseppe Crisafulli ◽  
Silvia Caimmi ◽  
...  

Biologic drugs are widely used in pediatric medicine. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in particular are a therapeutic option for rheumatic, autoinflammatory and oncologic diseases. Adverse drug reactions and hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to mAbs may occur in children. Clinical presentation of HSRs to mAbs can be classified according to phenotypes in infusion-related reactions, cytokine release syndrome, both alpha type reactions and type I (IgE/non-IgE), type III, and type IV reactions, all beta-type reactions. The aim of this review is to focus on HSRs associated with the most frequent mAbs in childhood, with particular attention to beta-type reactions. When a reaction to mAbs is suspected a diagnostic work-up including in-vivo and in-vitro testing should be performed. A drug provocation test is recommended only when no alternative drugs are available. In selected patients with immediate IgE-mediated drug allergy a desensitization protocol is indicated. Despite the heavy use of mAbs in childhood, studies evaluating the reliability of diagnostic test are lacking. Although desensitization may be effective in reducing the risk of reactions in children, standardized pediatric protocols are still not available.


2022 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arantza Vega ◽  
M. Isabel Peña ◽  
Inés Torrado

Background:Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) allows first-line therapies in patients with immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) to chemotherapeutic drugs (ChD) and monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Desensitization in delayed drug reactions has traditionally used slow protocols extending up to several weeks; RDD protocols have been scarcely reported.Patients and Method:We retrospectively analyzed the patients referred to the Allergy Department, who had experienced a delayed DHR (> 6 h) related to a ChD or mAb and underwent an RDD protocol. The rate of successful administration of the offending drug and the presence of adverse reactions were evaluated.Results:A total of 93 RDDs were performed in 11 patients (including 6 men and 5 women, with a median age of 61 years). The primary DHR were maculopapular exanthema (MPE) (8), generalized delayed urticaria (1), MPE with pustulosis and facial edema (1), and facial edema with desquamative eczema (1). The meantime for the onset of symptoms was 3 days (range 1–16 days). RDD was performed using a protocol involving 8–13 steps, with temozolomide (25), bendamustine (4), rituximab (9), infliximab (24), gemcitabine (23), and docetaxel (8), within 4.6–6.5 h. Sixteen breakthrough reactions were reported during the RDD (17.2 %) in 5 patients; all were mild reactions including 11 delayed and 5 immediate reactions. All patients completed their treatment.Conclusions:RDD is a potentially safe and effective procedure in patients suffering from delayed reactions to ChD and mAb. It allows them to receive full treatment in a short period, thereby reducing time and hospital visits.


BioDrugs ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Mezzano ◽  
Pedro Giavina-Bianchi ◽  
Matthieu Picard ◽  
Joana Caiado ◽  
Mariana Castells

Pharmacology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Giulia Liccioli ◽  
Gabriele Simonini ◽  
Federico Melani ◽  
Mattia Giovannini ◽  
Silvia Ricci ◽  
...  

Biological agents have had an increased usage during the past years, also in pediatric population. Monoclonal antibodies can cause adverse drug reactions with different pathomechanisms, including type I IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (HR). In this report, we describe 2 children who had a diagnosis of anaphylaxis to rituximab (RTX), confirmed by positive in vivo tests in both cases and elevated tryptase value in one case. We also made a review of the few cases of HR to RTX in pediatric population reported in literature and discuss differential diagnosis and utility of allergy investigations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
J. Szebeni ◽  
T. Mészáros ◽  
Z. Weiszhár ◽  
T. Schneider ◽  
L. Rosivall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document