Global Developmental Delay and Mental Retardation/Intellectual Disability

Author(s):  
Elliott H. Sherr ◽  
Michael I. Shevell
Author(s):  
Uirá Souto Melo ◽  
Devon Bonner ◽  
Kevin C. Kent Lloyd ◽  
Ala Moshiri ◽  
Brandon Willis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhannad RM Salih ◽  
Mohd Baidi Bahari ◽  
Mohamed Azmi Ahmad Hassali ◽  
Asrul Akmal Shafie ◽  
Omer Qutaiba B Al-lela ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction: Seizure-free patients or substantial reduction in seizure frequency are the most important outcome measures in the management of epilepsy. The study aimed to evaluate the patterns of seizure frequency and its relationship with demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Pediatric Neurology Clinic, Hospital Pulau Pinang. Over a period of 6 months, the required data were extracted from the medical records using a pre-designed data collection form. Results: Seizure frequency showed no significant association with patient’s demographics and clinical characteristic. However, significant reduction in seizure frequency from the baseline to the last follow-up visit was only seen in certain subgroups of patients including Malays, females, patients <4 years of age, patients with global developmental delay/intellectual disability, and patients with focal seizure. There was no significant association between seizure frequency and rate of adverse events. Polytherapy visits were associated with higher seizure frequency than monotherapy visits (27.97 ± 56.66, 10.94 ± 30.96 attack per month, respectively) (P < 0.001). There was a clear tendency to get antiepileptic drugs used at doses above the recommended range in polytherapy (8.4%) rather than in monotherapy (1.4%) visits (P < 0.001). A significant correlation was found between seizure frequency and number of visits per patient per year (r = 0.450, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Among children with structural–metabolic epilepsy, Malays, females, patients <4 years of age, patients with global developmental delay/intellectual disability and patients manifested with focal seizure are more responsive antiepileptic drug therapy than the other subgroups of patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-561
Author(s):  
Muhammad Umair ◽  
Mariam Ballow ◽  
Abdulaziz Asiri ◽  
Yusra Alyafee ◽  
Abeer Tuwaijri ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Miclea ◽  
Loredana Peca ◽  
Zina Cuzmici ◽  
Ioan Victor Pop

Genetic factors are responsible for up to 40 % developmental disability cases, such as global developmental delay/ intellectual disability (GDD/DI). The American and more recently, the European guidelines on this group of diseases state that genetic testing is essential and should become a standardized diagnostic practice. The main arguments for the necessity of implementing such a practice are: (1) the high prevalence of developmental disabilities (3% of the population); (2) the high genetic contribution to this type of pathology; (3) insufficient referral for genetic consultation. In an attempt to address these issues, the purpose of this paper is to present the genetic etiology of global developmental delay / intellectual disability with emphasis on the need to implement a genetic testing protocol for the patients with GDD/DI, as indicated by the current guidelines. Chromosomal abnormalities and fragile X syndrome are the most frequent causes of developmental disabilities and the techniques employed to detect such genetic disorders should be used as first line investigations of GDD/DI. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document