Effects of agricultural intensification on soil biodiversity and implications for ecosystem functioning: A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne de Graaff ◽  
Nicole Hornslein ◽  
Heather L. Throop ◽  
Paul Kardol ◽  
Linda T.A. van Diepen
2017 ◽  
pp. 119-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Bardgett ◽  
Franciska T. de Vries ◽  
Wim H. van der Putten

SOIL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-A. de Graaff ◽  
J. Adkins ◽  
P. Kardol ◽  
H. L. Throop

Abstract. Loss of biodiversity impacts ecosystem functions, such as carbon (C) cycling. Soils are the largest terrestrial C reservoir, containing more C globally than the biotic and atmospheric pools together. As such, soil C cycling, and the processes controlling it, has the potential to affect atmospheric CO2 concentrations and subsequent climate change. Despite the growing evidence of links between plant diversity and soil C cycling, there is a dearth of information on whether similar relationships exist between soil biodiversity and C cycling. This knowledge gap occurs even though there has been increased recognition that soil communities display high levels of both taxonomic and functional diversity and are key drivers of fluxes of C between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we used meta-analysis and regression analysis to quantitatively assess how soil biodiversity affects soil C cycling pools and processes (i.e., soil C respiration, litter decomposition, and plant biomass). We compared the response of process variables to changes in diversity both within and across groups of soil organisms that differed in body size, a grouping that typically correlates with ecological function. When studies that manipulated both within- and across-body size group diversity were included in the meta-analysis, loss of diversity significantly reduced soil C respiration (−27.5%) and plant tissue decomposition (−18%) but did not affect above- or belowground plant biomass. The loss of within-group diversity significantly reduced soil C respiration, while loss of across-group diversity did not. Decomposition was negatively affected both by loss of within-group and across-group diversity. Furthermore, loss of microbial diversity strongly reduced soil C respiration (−41%). In contrast, plant tissue decomposition was negatively affected by loss of soil faunal diversity but was unaffected by loss of microbial diversity. Taken together, our findings show that loss of soil biodiversity strongly impacts on soil C cycling processes, and highlight the importance of diversity across groups of organisms (e.g., primary consumers and secondary decomposers) for maintaining full functionality of C cycle processes. However, our understanding of the complex relationships between soil biodiversity and C cycling processes is currently limited by the sheer number of methodological concerns associated with these studies, which can greatly overestimate or underestimate the impact of soil biodiversity on soil C cycling, challenging extrapolation to natural field settings. Future studies should attempt to further elucidate the relative importance of taxonomic diversity (species numbers) versus functional diversity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1694) ◽  
pp. 20150283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra M. Lewandowska ◽  
Antje Biermann ◽  
Elizabeth T. Borer ◽  
Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras ◽  
Steven A. J. Declerck ◽  
...  

Numerous studies show that increasing species richness leads to higher ecosystem productivity. This effect is often attributed to more efficient portioning of multiple resources in communities with higher numbers of competing species, indicating the role of resource supply and stoichiometry for biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Here, we merged theory on ecological stoichiometry with a framework of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning to understand how resource use transfers into primary production. We applied a structural equation model to define patterns of diversity–productivity relationships with respect to available resources. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the findings across ecosystem types ranging from aquatic ecosystems to grasslands and forests. As hypothesized, resource supply increased realized productivity and richness, but we found significant differences between ecosystems and study types. Increased richness was associated with increased productivity, although this effect was not seen in experiments. More even communities had lower productivity, indicating that biomass production is often maintained by a few dominant species, and reduced dominance generally reduced ecosystem productivity. This synthesis, which integrates observational and experimental studies in a variety of ecosystems and geographical regions, exposes common patterns and differences in biodiversity–functioning relationships, and increases the mechanistic understanding of changes in ecosystems productivity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léa Beaumelle ◽  
Frederik De Laender ◽  
Nico Eisenhauer

AbstractUnderstanding the consequences of ongoing biodiversity changes for ecosystems is a pressing challenge. Controlled biodiversity-ecosystem function experiments with random biodiversity loss scenarios have demonstrated that more diverse communities usually provide higher levels of ecosystem functioning. However, it is not clear if these results predict the ecosystem consequences of environmental changes that cause non-random alterations in biodiversity and community composition. We synthesized 69 independent studies reporting 660 observations of the impacts of two pervasive drivers of global change (chemical stressors and nutrient enrichment) on animal and microbial decomposer diversity and litter decomposition. Using meta-analysis and structural equation modelling, we show that declines in decomposer diversity and abundance explain reduced litter decomposition in response to stressors but not to nutrients. While chemical stressors generally reduced biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, detrimental effects of nutrients occurred only at high levels of nutrient inputs. Thus, more intense environmental change does not always result in stronger responses, illustrating the complexity of ecosystem consequences of biodiversity change. Overall, these findings provide strong empirical evidence for significant real-world biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships when human activities decrease biodiversity. This highlights that the consequences of biodiversity change for ecosystems are nontrivial and depend on the kind of environmental change.


Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 364 (6446) ◽  
pp. 1189-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon J. Brandl ◽  
Luke Tornabene ◽  
Christopher H. R. Goatley ◽  
Jordan M. Casey ◽  
Renato A. Morais ◽  
...  

How coral reefs survive as oases of life in low-productivity oceans has puzzled scientists for centuries. The answer may lie in internal nutrient cycling and/or input from the pelagic zone. Integrating meta-analysis, field data, and population modeling, we show that the ocean’s smallest vertebrates, cryptobenthic reef fishes, promote internal reef fish biomass production through extensive larval supply from the pelagic environment. Specifically, cryptobenthics account for two-thirds of reef fish larvae in the near-reef pelagic zone despite limited adult reproductive outputs. This overwhelming abundance of cryptobenthic larvae fuels reef trophodynamics via rapid growth and extreme mortality, producing almost 60% of consumed reef fish biomass. Although cryptobenthics are often overlooked, their distinctive demographic dynamics may make them a cornerstone of ecosystem functioning on modern coral reefs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Liu ◽  
Xiaoyun Chen ◽  
Feng Hu ◽  
Wei Ran ◽  
Qirong Shen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Ferlian ◽  
Nico Eisenhauer ◽  
Martin Aguirrebengoa ◽  
Mariama Camara ◽  
Irene Ramirez‐Rojas ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Fragoso ◽  
G.G. Brown ◽  
J.C. Patrón ◽  
E. Blanchart ◽  
P. Lavelle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document