scholarly journals 769 Which factors affect the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node dysfunction after pacemaker implantation?

EP Europace ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
K.J. Ko ◽  
H.E. Lim ◽  
H.N. Pak ◽  
H.S. Lee ◽  
J.H. Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Sinus Node Dysfunction

P1259Right atrial low voltage zone as a novel predictor of sinus node dysfunction in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Kondo ◽  
M Kimura ◽  
M Nakayama ◽  
O Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Low Voltage ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Sinus Node Dysfunction ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ablation Procedure ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Although sinus node dysfunction (SND) coexists with atrial fibrillation (AF) in some cases, SND in patients with Non-paroxysmal AF (Non-PAF) could not be estimated in conventional electrophysiological study. Atrial low voltage zone (LVZ), which may be surrogate for atrial fibrosis, is although reported to present in patients with Non-PAF, the association between SND and right atrial LVZ (RA-LVZ) has not been fully evaluated. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between SND and RA-LVZ in patients with Non-PAF. Method Eighty-six Non-PAF patients underwent high density voltage mapping of right atrium (RA) during AF before ablation procedure. We defined LVZ as that with electrogram amplitude <0.1 mV in order to delineate strongly damaged area in RA. We evaluated the surface are of the RA-LVZ in Non-PAF patients with and without SND. Results Twenty-seven of 86 patients (31.4%) presented with SND after AF termination. There were no significant differences between patients with and without SND in variables such as age, sex, AF duration, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean value of RA-LVZ of all the patients was 12.1±11.4%, and RA-LVZ was significantly larger in patients with SND than in those without SND (22.8±14.6 vs 7.2±4.2%; P<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis for the incidence of subsequent pacemaker implantation (PMI), only RA-LVZ was a significant predictor of subsequent PMI (odd ratio 1.306; 95% confidence interval 1.159 - 1.473; P<0.001). Receiving-operating characteristic curve for PMI following ablation procedure indicated cut-off value 10.5% for RA-LVZ with 85.2% sensitivity and 88.1% specificity (area under curve = 0.924, P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the incidence of PMI after AF termination showed that freedom from pacemaker implantation was significantly better in patients with RA-LVA <10.5% than in those with RA-LVZ ≥10.5% (log-rank test; P<0.001). Conclusions Broad RA-LVZ measured during AF was strongly associated with SND and PMI after AF termination in patients with Non-PAF. Evaluation of RA-LVZ during AF could be a potential target in predicting SND requiring PMI in patients with Non-PAF.

scholarly journals Sinus node dysfunction associates with atrial high-rate episodes after DDD pacemaker implantation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Xue ◽  
Hai Zou ◽  
Lihong Wang ◽  
Hong Shao ◽  
Yuan Ma
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Dysfunction ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Atrial Pacing ◽  
Dual Chamber ◽  
Dual Chamber Pacemaker ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background： Patients implanted with pacemakers frequently develop atrial fibrillation. Pacemaker-detected atrial high-rate episodes or AHREs, where one AHRE is defined as ≥ 160beats/min lasting ≥ 5 minutes, may identify patients at increased risk for stroke and death. In this study, we sought to observe whether patients with sinus node dysfunction or atria-ventricular block are more likely to develop AHREs. Methods: A total of 103 patients (age 69.4±13.5 years，58% female) with DDD/DDDR pacemakers were enrolled for the study. These pacemakers were equipped with features that enabled the detection and storage of information such as the dates, durations and sequential episodes of AHRE. Patients were followed up for 2 years and the time of the first occurrence of AHRE was determined at follow-up visit. Other data such as age, gender, structural heart disease, concomitant non-cardiac diseases, the cumulative percentage of atrial pacing (Cum% AP) and ventricular pacing (Cum% VP) were also collected. Results: Atrial fibrillation developed frequently after the dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. AHRE occurred more often in patients with sinus node disease (SND) than those with atrioventricular block (AVB) （OR, 2.553; 95%CI, 1.122-5.814；P=0.045）. Conclusions: AHRE developed frequently after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. Patients with SND are more likely to develop AF compared to the patients with AVB.

Atrial tachyarrhythmias in bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome: characterization and evolution

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1954-1957
Author(s):  
Luigi Padeletti ◽  
Roberto De Ponti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Atrial Flutter ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Ventricular Myocardium ◽  
Sinus Node Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmias ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease

The association of sinus node disease and atrial tachyarrhythmias characterizes the bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, which may result in an increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. Ageing and several cardiac and extracardiac diseases, which have the potential to affect both the atrial and the ventricular myocardium, can manifest their influence predominantly on the atria, leading to an atrial cardiomyopathy. In these cases, the same pathological process which leads to sinus node dysfunction can create a favourable substrate also for atrial tachyarrhythmias, which, if not present at the time of the initial diagnosis of the sinus node disease, can occur with an increasing prevalence during follow-up. In younger patients with no evident structural heart disease, a bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome may be the first clinical and unexpected manifestation of a still undiagnosed inherited genetic disease and therefore a specific diagnostic workup is necessary. In bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, the most frequently encountered atrial tachyarrhythmia is atrial fibrillation, while typical atrial flutter is rarer. In peculiar subgroups of patients, other atrial tachyarrhythmias, such as atypical atrial flutter, macroreentrant or focal atrial tachycardia, may be present. In bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, the evolution of atrial tachyarrhythmias clearly shows a worsening with an prevalence of associated atrial tachyarrhythmia over time. Pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias is of limited use, due to the concomitant sinus node dysfunction. The modality of pacing used to manage the sinus node disease has to be carefully chosen to minimize the evolution of atrial tachyarrhythmias. In fact, while ventricular pacing increases the incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke, dual-chamber pacing with a specific algorithm for ventricular pacing minimization and prevention and treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias reduces a composite endpoint of evolution to permanent atrial fibrillation, hospitalization, and death.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document