scholarly journals Cycling injury risk in Britain: A case-crossover study of infrastructural and route environment correlates

2021 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 106063
Author(s):  
Georgios Kapousizis ◽  
Anna Goodman ◽  
Rachel Aldred
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
MANDY WILLIAMS ◽  
MOHAMMED MOHSIN ◽  
DANIELLE WEBER ◽  
BIN JALALUDIN ◽  
JOHN CROZIER

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Fisman ◽  
Anthony D. Harris ◽  
Michael Rubin ◽  
Gary S. Sorock ◽  
Murray A. Mittleman

Background.Extreme fatigue in medical trainees likely compromises patient safety, but regulations that limit trainee work hours have been controversial. It is not known whether extreme fatigue compromises trainee safety in the healthcare workplace, but evidence of such a relationship would inform the current debate on trainee work practices. Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between fatigue and workplace injury risk among medical trainees and nontrainee healthcare workers.Design.Case-crossover study.Setting.Five academic medical centers in the United States and Canada.Participants.Healthcare workers reporting to employee healthcare clinics for evaluation of needlestick injuries and other injuries related to sharp instruments and devices (sharps injuries). Consenting workers completed a structured interview about work patterns, time at risk of injury, and frequency of fatigue.Results.Of 350 interviewed subjects, 109 (31%) were medical trainees. Trainees worked more hours per week (P < .001) and slept less the night before an injury (P < .001) than did other healthcare workers. Fatigue increased injury risk in the study population as a whole (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-1.90]), but this effect was limited to medical trainees (IRR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.71-5.07]) and was absent for other healthcare workers (IRR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.66-1.42]) (P = .001).Conclusions.Long work hours and sleep deprivation among medical trainees result in fatigue, which is associated with a 3-fold increase in the risk of sharps injury. Efforts to reduce trainee work hours may result in reduced risk of sharps-related injuries among this group.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0164498 ◽  
Author(s):  
June T. Spector ◽  
David K. Bonauto ◽  
Lianne Sheppard ◽  
Tania Busch-Isaksen ◽  
Miriam Calkins ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 908-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Kinlin ◽  
Murray A. Mittleman ◽  
Anthony D. Harris ◽  
Michael A. Rubin ◽  
David N. Fisman

Objective.Standard precautions are advocated for reducing the number of injuries caused by needles and sharp medical devices (“sharps injuries”), but the effectiveness of gloves in preventing such injuries has not been established. We evaluated factors associated with gloving practices and identified associations between gloving practices and sharps-injury risk.Design.Usual-frequency case-crossover study.Setting.Thirteen medical centers in the United States and Canada.Participants.Six hundred thirty-six healthcare workers who presented to employee health clinics after sharps injury.Methods.Structured telephone questionnaires were administered to assess usual behaviors and circumstances at the time of injury.Results.Of 636 injured healthcare workers, 195 were scrubbed in an operating room or procedure suite when injured, and 441 were injured elsewhere. Nonscrubbed individuals were more commonly gloved when treating patients who were perceived to have a high risk of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection than when treating other patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.53 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.30-4.91]). Nurses (aOR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.04-0.32]) and other employees (aOR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.07-0.77]) were less commonly gloved at injury than were physicians and physician trainees. Gloves reduced injury risk in case-crossover analyses (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.22-0.50]). In scrubbed individuals, involvement in an orthopedic procedure was associated with double gloving at injury (aOR, 13.7 [95% CI, 4.55-41.3]); this gloving practice was associated with decreased injury risk (IRR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.10-0.42]).Conclusions.Although the use of gloves reduces the risk of sharps injuries in health care, use among healthcare workers is inconsistent and may be influenced by risk perception and healthcare culture. Glove use should be emphasized as a key element of multimodal sharps-injury reduction programs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 588-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam M Calkins ◽  
David Bonauto ◽  
Anjum Hajat ◽  
Max Lieblich ◽  
Noah Seixas ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 118271
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
Liansheng Zhang ◽  
Jing Wei ◽  
Linjiong Liu ◽  
Yaqi Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rachel Aldred ◽  
Georgios Kapousizis ◽  
Anna Goodman

Objective: This paper examines infrastructural and route environment correlates of cycling injury risk in Britain for commuters riding in the morning peak. Methods: The study uses a case-crossover design which controls for exposure. Control sites from modelled cyclist routes (matched on intersection status) were compared with sites where cyclists were injured. Conditional logistic regression for matched case–control groups was used to compare characteristics of control and injury sites. Results: High streets (defined by clustering of retail premises) raised injury odds by 32%. Main (Class A or primary) roads were riskier than other road types, with injury odds twice that for residential roads. Wider roads, and those with lower gradients increased injury odds. Guard railing raised injury odds by 18%, and petrol stations or car parks by 43%. Bus lanes raised injury odds by 84%. As in other studies, there was a ‘safety in numbers’ effect from more cyclists. Contrary to other analysis, including two recent studies in London, we did not find a protective effect from cycle infrastructure and the presence of painted cycle lanes raised injury odds by 54%. At intersections, both standard and mini roundabouts were associated with injury odds several times higher than other intersections. Presence of traffic signals, with or without an Advanced Stop Line (‘bike box’), had no impact on injury odds. For a cyclist on a main road, intersections with minor roads were riskier than intersections with other main roads. Conclusions: Typical cycling environments in Britain put cyclists at risk, and infrastructure must be improved, particularly on busy main roads, high streets, and bus routes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document