Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task

2007 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Igarashi ◽  
Norimichi Kitagawa ◽  
Charles Spence ◽  
Shigeru Ichihara
i-Perception ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 204166952110592
Author(s):  
Yosuke Suzuishi ◽  
Souta Hidaka

Vision of the body without task cues enhances tactile discrimination performance. This effect has been investigated only with static visual information, although our body usually moves, and dynamic visual and bodily information provides ownership (SoO) and agency (SoA) sensations to body parts. We investigated whether vision of body movements could enhance tactile discrimination performance. Participants observed white dots without any textural information showing lateral hand movements (dynamic condition) or static hands (static condition). For participants experiencing the dynamic condition first, it induced a lower tactile discrimination threshold, as well as a stronger SoO and SoA, compared to the static condition. For participants observing the static condition first, the magnitudes of the enhancement effect in the dynamic condition were positively correlated between the tactile discrimination and SoO/SoA. The enhancement of the dynamic visual information was not observed when the hand shape was not maintained in the scrambled white dot images. Our results suggest that dynamic visual information without task cues can enhance tactile discrimination performance by feeling SoO and SoA only when it maintains bodily information.


i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic927 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 927-927
Author(s):  
Georgiana Juravle ◽  
Charles Spence

Cortex ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Moffett ◽  
M.V. Driver ◽  
P. St. John-Loe ◽  
G. Ettlinger

1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Hörster ◽  
A. Rivers ◽  
B. Schuster ◽  
G. Ettlinger ◽  
W. Skreczek ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Kowalewski ◽  
Jan-Christoph Kattenstroth ◽  
Tobias Kalisch ◽  
Hubert R. Dinse

Neuroplasticity underlies the brain’s ability to alter perception and behavior through training, practice, or simply exposure to sensory stimulation. Improvement of tactile discrimination has been repeatedly demonstrated after repetitive sensory stimulation (rSS) of the fingers; however, it remains unknown if such protocols also affect hand dexterity or pain thresholds. We therefore stimulated the thumb and index finger of young adults to investigate, besides testing tactile discrimination, the impact of rSS on dexterity, pain, and touch thresholds. We observed an improvement in the pegboard task where subjects used the thumb and index finger only. Accordingly, stimulating 2 fingers simultaneously potentiates the efficacy of rSS. In fact, we observed a higher gain of discrimination performance as compared to a single-finger rSS. In contrast, pain and touch thresholds remained unaffected. Our data suggest that selecting particular fingers modulates the efficacy of rSS, thereby affecting processes controlling sensorimotor integration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document