Two-scale concurrent topology optimization of lattice structures with connectable microstructures

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 101427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pai Liu ◽  
Zhan Kang ◽  
Yangjun Luo
Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 678
Author(s):  
Zijun Wu ◽  
Renbin Xiao

This work presents a topology optimization method for symmetric hierarchical lattice structures with substructuring. In this method, we define two types of symmetric lattice substructures, each of which contains many finite elements. By controlling the materials distribution of these elements, the configuration of substructure can be changed. And then each substructure is condensed into a super-element. A surrogate model based on a series of super-elements can be built using the cubic B-spline interpolation. Here, the relative density of substructure is set as the design variable. The optimality criteria method is used for the updating of design variables on two scales. In the process of topology optimization, the symmetry of microstructure is determined by self-defined microstructure configuration, while the symmetry of macro structure is determined by boundary conditions. In this proposed method, because of the educing number of degree of freedoms on macrostructure, the proposed method has high efficiency in optimization. Numerical examples show that both the size and the number of substructures have essential influences on macro structure, indicating the effectiveness of the presented method.


Author(s):  
Boštjan Harl ◽  
Jožef Predan ◽  
Marko Kegl ◽  
Dejan Dinevski

This paper discusses modern simulation procedures used in design of structural load-carrying parts that are based on the Finite Element Method. The specific focus of the paper is the topology optimization usage within the context of two currently very interesting topics: configuration and optimization of lattice structures and modern additive manufacturing technologies. Both types of structures are presented together with their limits as well as their potentials for optimization. The discussion is illustrated by two numerical examples and experimentally obtained results. In the examples, a simple beam with three points load is optimized regarding to the different topology setups. The stress fields for different loaded optimized versions of structures are presented and the solutions are discussed and compared to the results of the experiment. A standalone topology optimization software CAESS ProTOp is used for the domain configuration and topology optimization in both examples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document