scholarly journals Context-dependent foraging habitat selection in a farmland raptor along an agricultural intensification gradient

2022 ◽  
Vol 326 ◽  
pp. 107782
Author(s):  
Giacomo Assandri ◽  
Jacopo G. Cecere ◽  
Maurizio Sarà ◽  
Carlo Catoni ◽  
Federico De Pascalis ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e53077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Monsarrat ◽  
Simon Benhamou ◽  
François Sarrazin ◽  
Carmen Bessa-Gomes ◽  
Willem Bouten ◽  
...  

Ibis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-519
Author(s):  
Arnaud G. Barras ◽  
Sophie Marti ◽  
Sarah Ettlin ◽  
Sergio Vignali ◽  
Jaime Resano‐Mayor ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 158 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Brambilla ◽  
Matteo Cortesi ◽  
Federico Capelli ◽  
Dan Chamberlain ◽  
Paolo Pedrini ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 1157-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E Duchamp ◽  
Dale W Sparks ◽  
John O Whitaker, Jr.

We compared habitat use of two sympatric species of bat in a rural area undergoing suburban development. The two species are similar in diet and foraging-habitat use but differ in current roosting habitat, and exhibit contrasting regional population trends. Evening bat, Nycticeius humeralis (Rafinesque, 1818), populations are declining in central Indiana, whereas big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus (Beauvois, 1796), populations are increasing. We assessed habitat selection by 22 adult female bats using radiotelemetry and compositional analysis. Eptesicus fuscus used several roosts across the study area; all but one roosted in human-made structures. Nycticeius humeralis clustered roosts within a small group of woodlots; all roosted in tree cavities. Eptesicus fuscus foraged for longer periods of time and nonreproductive individuals of this species had larger foraging ranges than N. humeralis. Both species foraged primarily in agricultural and wooded areas. During foraging, N. humeralis showed greater foraging-site fidelity and a stronger selection for agricultural and wooded areas than E. fuscus. We suggest that N. humeralis in our study area is probably more sensitive to suburban development near their roosts than E. fuscus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-324
Author(s):  
Alexander Kurniawan Sariyanto Putera ◽  
Dyah Perwitasari-Farajallah ◽  
Yeni Aryati Mulyani ◽  
Stanislav Lhota ◽  
Riki Herliansyah ◽  
...  

Balikpapan Bay is one of the wetlands providing potential foraging habitat for waterbirds in Indonesia. Potential habitat loss due to oil industry expansion, recent waterbird occurrence, and co-occurrence of two closely related species with similar foraging characteristics led to habitat selection. Habitat selection could be affected by food as an intrinsic factor and extrinsic factor, for example, accessibility to the physical and biological components of the habitat. This study aimed to measure the foraging habitat selection, identify significant habitat quality parameters for the habitat selection and predict the foraging habitat selection model. We used one-zero sampling for collecting foraging habitat selection data, corer sampling for prey data, and collecting the abiotic environment, and Generalized Linear Modelling (GLM) to build the model. We identified four species as the migrant Little Egret (Egretta garzetta), Great Egret (Ardea alba), Purple Heron (Ardea purpurea), and Lesser Adjutant (Leptoptilos javanicus). All species, except Purple Heron, selected foraging habitats. A simple mathematic model of foraging habitat selection was significantly affected by two factors: water depth and patch area. A large patch area may provide primary prey abundance for waterbirds, while a low water depth level may give easy access to the prey.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document