Extracorporeal support for trauma: A trauma quality improvement project (TQIP) analysis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 170-176
Author(s):  
Reynold Henry ◽  
Cameron Ghafil ◽  
Alice Piccinini ◽  
Panagiotis K. Liasidis ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Filippo Binda ◽  
Federica Marelli ◽  
Alessandro Galazzi ◽  
Riccardo Pascuzzo ◽  
Ileana Adamini ◽  
...  

Background At the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italy had the highest number of deaths in Europe; most occurred in the Lombardy region. Up to 4% of patients with COVID-19 required admission to an intensive care unit because they developed a critical illness (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome). Numerous patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who had been admitted to the intensive care unit required rescue therapy like prone positioning. Objectives To describe the respiratory management of and the extensive use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 at the intensive care unit hub in Lombardy, Italy. Methods A total of 89 patients (67% male; median age, 59 years [range, 23-80 years]) with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted between February 23 and March 31, 2020, were enrolled in this quality improvement project. Results Endotracheal intubation was required in 86 patients (97%). Prone positioning was used as rescue therapy in 43 (48%) patients. Significantly more younger patients (age ≤ 59 years) were discharged alive (43 of 48 [90%]) than were older patients (age ≥ 60 years; 26 of 41 [63%]; P < .005). Among the 43 patients treated with prone ventilation, 15 (35% [95% CI, 21%-51%]) died in the intensive care unit, of which 10 (67%; P < .001) were older patients. Conclusions Prone positioning is one strategy available for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. During this pandemic, prone positioning can be used extensively as rescue therapy, per a specific protocol, in intensive care units.


1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 377-379
Author(s):  
W Demajo

The usefulness of managing adult patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and hypoxemia by means of systems using extracorporeal oxygenation has been questioned. A National Institutes of Health multicentre study, published in 1979, reported survival rates of 9.5% and 8.3% in extracorporeally and ventilator managed patients, respectively. Another recent study reports survival rates of 33% and 42% in ventilator and extracorporealy managed patients, respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant. Indications for extracorporeal oxygenation may need to be re-evaluated to clarify those cases that would not be manageable with current ventilation strategies and, hence, would merit extracorporeal support.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Revercomb ◽  
Ankit Hanmandlu ◽  
Nancy Wareing ◽  
Bindu Akkanti ◽  
Harry Karmouty-Quintana

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe and often fatal disease. The causes that lead to ARDS are multiple and include inhalation of salt water, smoke particles, or as a result of damage caused by respiratory viruses. ARDS can also arise due to systemic complications such as blood transfusions, sepsis, or pancreatitis. Unfortunately, despite a high mortality rate of 40%, there are limited treatment options available for ARDS outside of last resort options such as mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal support strategies.Aim of review: A complication of ARDS is the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH); however, the mechanisms that lead to PH in ARDS are not fully understood. In this review, we summarize the known mechanisms that promote PH in ARDS.Key scientific concepts of review: (1) Provide an overview of acute respiratory distress syndrome; (2) delineate the mechanisms that contribute to the development of PH in ARDS; (3) address the implications of PH in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).


Author(s):  
Susanna Price ◽  
Guido Tavazzi

This chapter will introduce the key features to address in sepsis using echocardiography, including: volaemic status (requirement for, and tolerance to, volume); alteration in myocardial function; when sepsis is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and assessment of right heart function for potential extracorporeal support; differentiation of pulmonary oedema from acute respiratory distress syndrome; changes in pulmonary artery systolic pressures and/or pulmonary vascular resistance; and exclusion/diagnosis of the underlying cause of sepsis, including endocarditis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document