Measuring the Effect of Hospital Cleaning Intervention to Prevent Health Care Assocaiated Infections

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. e72
Author(s):  
Yoko Tsukamoto ◽  
Yoko J. Tsukamoto ◽  
Kaori Yamada
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
İlker Devrim ◽  
Aslı Çatıkoğlu ◽  
Nuri Bayram

Abstract Background The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents important infection control challenges for the health care facilities. Proper cleaning of the patient's room after the discharge of the patients is important to protect the housekeeping staff as well as other patients Methods In this study, we reviewed our experience with a novel multipurpose hybrid UV disinfecting and air disinfecting robot and the impact of it for preventing hospital cleaners getting occupational COVID-19 infection. Results Between 11, March 2020 and 11 December 2020, a total of 301 children with COVID-19 were hospitalized at the COVID-19 ward. The mean hospital stay was 3.77 ± 2.71 days (range from1 to 20 days) and total COVID-19 related-care. The mean working time was 9.4 ± 1.6 months (range 5 to 10 months). The total working hours for a month for one hospital cleaner was 196 to 204 hours per month. The total duration of the UVC-robot was 491 hours 33 minutes for fans and 473 hours 20 minutes for UV lamps. During the follow-up period, two of the hospital cleaners had definitively community-acquired COVID-19 infection, but none of them had symptomatic COVID-19 infection during the study period. Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, none of the hospital cleaners got hospital-associated COVID-19 infection. The combination of personal protective equipment in addition to UVC-robot integrated environmental disinfection is an important strategy to protect health-care workers.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Kendra Carlson

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


1988 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 637-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
TA Dolan ◽  
CR Corey ◽  
HE Freeman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document