Successful reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Focus on nurse-directed catheter removal

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1178-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Parry ◽  
Brenda Grant ◽  
Merima Sestovic
2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. e92-e93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Roser ◽  
Terry Altpeter ◽  
Dee Anderson ◽  
Mark Dougherty ◽  
Jo Ellen Walton ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Mullin ◽  
Christopher S. Kovacs ◽  
Cynthia Fatica ◽  
Colette Einloth ◽  
Elizabeth A. Neuner ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDCatheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). Reducing CAUTI rates has become a major focus of attention due to increasing public health concerns and reimbursement implications.OBJECTIVETo implement and describe a multifaceted intervention to decrease CAUTIs in our ICUs with an emphasis on indications for obtaining a urine culture.METHODSA project team composed of all critical care disciplines was assembled to address an institutional goal of decreasing CAUTIs. Interventions implemented between year 1 and year 2 included protocols recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for placement, maintenance, and removal of catheters. Leaders from all critical care disciplines agreed to align routine culturing practice with American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCCM) and Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for evaluating a fever in a critically ill patient. Surveillance data for CAUTI and hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (HABSI) were recorded prospectively according to National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) protocols. Device utilization ratios (DURs), rates of CAUTI, HABSI, and urine cultures were calculated and compared.RESULTSThe CAUTI rate decreased from 3.0 per 1,000 catheter days in 2013 to 1.9 in 2014. The DUR was 0.7 in 2013 and 0.68 in 2014. The HABSI rates per 1,000 patient days decreased from 2.8 in 2013 to 2.4 in 2014.CONCLUSIONSEffectively reducing ICU CAUTI rates requires a multifaceted and collaborative approach; stewardship of culturing was a key and safe component of our successful reduction efforts.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:186–188


2009 ◽  
Vol 249 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urs Pfefferkorn ◽  
Lea Sanlav ◽  
Jörg Moldenhauer ◽  
Ralph Peterli ◽  
Markus von Flüe ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 4314-4316 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.G Rabkin ◽  
M.D Stifelman ◽  
J Birkhoff ◽  
K.A Richardson ◽  
D Cohen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ylva Kai-Larsen ◽  
Stefan Grass ◽  
Bhaumik Mody ◽  
Swati Upadhyay ◽  
Hargovind L. Trivedi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections in the world. They are associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospital stay and increased healthcare costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the noble metal alloy (NMA) coated BIP Foley Catheter in preventing the incidence of symptomatic CAUTI in a large cohort of patients in India. Methods This multi-center, prospective study included 1000 adult patients admitted to six hospitals across India for urology, surgery and ICU requiring urethral catheterization and admission for ≥ 48 h. Patients were allocated to the NMA-coated BIP Foley Catheter group or a non-coated control catheter group, with a randomization ratio of 3:1. CAUTI surveillance was conducted at study entry, upon catheter removal, and 2 days after catheter removal. For statistical analysis, categorical data (e.g. gender) were compared using the chi-square or Fischer test, and numerical data were compared using the two-sample t-test. Associations were evaluated using logistic regression. Results and conclusions The incidence of symptomatic CAUTI was reduced by 69% in the BIP Foley Catheter group compared to the control group (6.5 vs 20.8 CAUTI/1000 catheter days), with an incidence rate ratio of 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.21–0.46; p < 0.001). A reduction in the cumulative CAUTI incidence was evident in the BIP Foley Catheter group within 3 days after catheterization; this reduction was maintained up to ~ 30 days, and the largest reductions were seen between 3 and 11 days. There were no serious adverse events related to either catheter, and the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 adverse event was significantly lower in the NMA-coated BIP Foley Catheter group than in the control group (21.6% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the NMA-coated BIP Foley Catheter was effective in reducing CAUTI and was well tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events compared to the uncoated catheter. Trial registration This study was registered prospectively (28 September 2015) in the Clinical Trials Registry of India (trial number CTRI/2015/09/006220; http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=12631&EncHid=&userName=bactiguard).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document