A concealed observational study of infection control and safe injection practices in Jordanian governmental hospitals

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1127-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar M. AL-Rawajfah ◽  
Ahmad Tubaishat
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph F. Perz ◽  
Nicola D. Thompson ◽  
Melissa K. Schaefer ◽  
Priti R. Patel

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s65-s66
Author(s):  
Tomislav Mestrovic ◽  
Jasminka Talapko ◽  
Tina Cikac ◽  
Marijana Neuberg

Background: Unlike passive didactic teaching, the introduction of innovative active-learning approaches to university nursing curricula aims to address the educational content in an interactive learning environment, improving in turn the learning process and problem-solving skills indispensable for future infection control professionals. One such strategy is the use of educational games, which can motivate students and enhance the degree of their engagement. We appraised the effectiveness of introducing an interactive game based on a popular television quiz show “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?” for educational attainment, exam performance, and course perception in nursing students. Methods: A whole generation of second-year undergraduate nursing students (126 female and 27 male participants; age range, 19–41 years) from a public university in Croatia (University Centre Varazdin, University North) were divided into 2 groups by cluster randomization; one group had received additional hours of game play after core training curriculum in a “Hygiene and Epidemiology” course, while the other had not. Game play was accomplished by employing ‘edutaining’ interactive multimedia approach, and covered primarily hand hygiene, cough etiquette, the use of personal protective equipment, sterilization and disinfection, and safe injection practices. Quantitative results of multiple-choice exams were used to evaluate any differences in the knowledge level of respective groups. A satisfaction opinion survey was used to gauge attitudes of students attending the course. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05 (2-tailed). Results: The mean baseline examination score was 28.30±5.79 points for the game group and 24.65±5.94 points for the control group, demonstrating improved knowledge retention when the interactive game was introduced into the curriculum. The statistically significant improvement in knowledge was observed in the domains of personal protective equipment and safe injection practices. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall scores between male and female students. Students who were subjected to game play expressed more agreement on a Likert scale regarding course enjoyment and innovativeness, albeit they did not differ from control group when assessing the educational merit of the course. Conclusions: Introducing interactive games to university courses that cover infection control may boost student enjoyment and enhance long-term retention of information, as confirmed by this study. Nonetheless, extra care should be taken when specific games that have not been assessed objectively are implemented. Further research in this field will elucidate how this increased knowledge retention in infection control principles translates to quotidian practice, for the benefit of students and (ultimately) patients.Funding: NoDisclosures: None


2011 ◽  
Vol 5;14 (5;9) ◽  
pp. 434-434
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Background: Recently, multiple regulations and recommendations for safe infection control practices and safe injection and medication vial utilization have been implemented. These include single dose and multi-dose vials for a single patient and regulations. It is a well known fact that transmission of bloodborne pathogens during health care procedures continues to occur because of the use of unsafe and improper injection, infusion, and medication administration. Multiple case reports have been published illustrating the occurrence of infections in interventional pain management and other minor techniques because of lack of safe injection practices, and noncompliance with other precautions. However, there are no studies or case reports illustrating the transmission of infection due to the use of single dose vials in multiple patients when appropriate precautions are observed. Similarly, the preparation standards for simple procedures such as medial branch blocks or transforaminal epidurals have not been proven to be essential. Further, the effectiveness or necessity of surgical face masks and hats, etc., for interventional techniques has not been proven. Objective: To assess the rates of infection in patients undergoing interventional techniques. Study Design: A prospective, non-randomized study of patients undergoing interventional techniques from May 2008 to December 2009. Study Setting: An interventional pain management practice, a specialty referral center, a private practice setting in the United States. Methods: All patients presenting for interventional techniques from May 2008 to December 2009 are included with documentation of various complications related to interventional techniques including infection. Results: May 2008 to December 2009 a total of 3,179 patients underwent 12,000 encounters with 18,472 procedures. A total of 12 patients reported suspicion of infection. All of them were evaluated by a physician and only one of them was a superficial infection due to the patient’s poor hygienic practices which required no antibiotic therapy. Limitations: Limitations include the nonrandomized observational nature of the study. Conclusion: There were no infections of any significance noted in approximately 3,200 patients with over 18,000 procedures performed during a 20 month period in an ambulatory surgery center utilizing simple precautions for clean procedures with the use of single dose vials for multiple patients and using safe injection practices. Clinical Trial Registrion: NCT00625248 Key words: Interventional pain management, interventional techniques, complications, infection, safe injection practices, single dose vials, multi-dose vials, surgical face masks, relative risk.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2595-2609
Author(s):  
Basel Bari ◽  
Marie-Andrée Corbeil ◽  
Hena Farooqui ◽  
Stuart Menzies ◽  
Brian Pflug ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. S4-S5
Author(s):  
Naomi Kuznets ◽  
Belle Lerner ◽  
Jan Davidson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Ainsworth ◽  
Sascha Miller ◽  
James Denison-Day ◽  
Beth Stuart ◽  
Julia Groot ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND To control the COVID-19 pandemic, people should adopt protective behaviours at home (self-isolation, social distancing, putting shopping/packages aside, wearing face-covering, cleaning and disinfecting, handwashing). There is currently limited support to help individuals conduct these behaviours. OBJECTIVE We aimed to report current household infection control behaviours in the UK, and examine how they might be improved. METHODS This was a pragmatic, cross-sectional observational study of anonymous participant data from Germ Defence (https://germdefence.org/), a freely available website providing behavioural advice for infection control within households. 28,285 users sought advice from four website pathways based on household status (advice to protect themselves generally, to protect others if the user was showing symptoms, to protect themselves if household members were showing symptoms, and to protect a household member who is at high risk). Users reported current infection control behaviours within the home, and intentions to change these behaviours. RESULTS Current behaviours varied across all infection control measures but were between ‘sometimes’ and ‘quite often’, except handwashing (‘very often’). Behaviours were similar regardless of the website pathway used. After using Germ Defence, users recorded intentions to improve infection control behaviour across all website pathways and for all behaviours. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported infection control behaviours other than handwashing are lower than is optimal for infection prevention, although handwashing is much higher. Advice using behaviour change techniques in Germ Defence led to intentions to improve these behaviours. Promoting Germ Defence within national and local public health/primary care guidance could reduce COVID-19 transmission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document