scholarly journals The impact of cervical effacement at time of amniotomy in patients undergoing induction of labor

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S612-S613
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. Rimsza ◽  
Jeannie C. Kelly ◽  
Antonina I. Frolova ◽  
Anthony O. Odibo ◽  
Ebony B. Carter ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaia Po’ ◽  
Emily A. Oliver ◽  
Uma M. Reddy ◽  
Robert M. Silver ◽  
Vincenzo Berghella

2007 ◽  
Vol 197 (6) ◽  
pp. S104
Author(s):  
Kyle Beiter ◽  
Dean V. Coonrod ◽  
David Drachman ◽  
James Balducci

Author(s):  
Haifa A. Alchalabi ◽  
Basil R. Obeidat ◽  
Mohammed F. Jallad ◽  
Yousef S. Khader

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Avagliano ◽  
Eleonora Virgili ◽  
Chiara Garò ◽  
Federica Quadrelli ◽  
Patrizia Doi ◽  
...  

Induction of labor is one of the most used procedures in obstetrics, performed to achieve vaginal delivery through cervical ripening and stimulation of uterine contractions. We investigated the impact of induction of labor upon placental autophagy, a catabolic pathway activated in response to alteration of the physiological intracellular conditions. We collected 28 singleton placentas at the time of uncomplicated term vaginal delivery (7 spontaneous onset of labor, 21 induced labor). Autophagy was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and immunoblotting. No significant difference in the autophagy expression was found between spontaneous or induced onset of labor. We found an inverse relationship between autophagy expression and the maternal prepregnancy body mass index, irrespective of the mode of labor onset. This result could be related to the nutritional maternal habits before and throughout pregnancy rather than rapid metabolic changes during labor.


Author(s):  
Pravati Tripathy ◽  
Prasanna Baby

  Objective: Labor induction by medication is now preferred by many obstetricians. The impact of induction remains ambiguous, although many studies and systematic reviews have been conducted. Few studies have reported for its better outcomes while other studies with poor outcomes. The objective of the study is to identify the common indications of induction and the risk of cesarean section after induction.Methods: Various standardized databases, such as Pub Med, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were used to collect the scientific studies, where prostaglandin was used as drug of choice for induction of labor. The key words used were induction of labor, indications of induction, induction by misoprostol, induction and risk of cesarean section, etc. The survey spans over 22 years of study articles published from the year 1995-2017.Result: A total of 112 studies have been included to analyze the indications and risk of cesarean section. The most common indication found in most of the studies was post-term pregnancy. The risk of cesarean section varied from 3% to 48.7%. The common reasons for which the cesarean section was planned were, failed induction, nonprogress of labor, fetal distress, and undiagnosed CPD.Conclusion: Most of the studies recommend induction of labor as a safer option with lower risk of c-section.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinjian Zhang ◽  
Siwen Chen ◽  
Xia Xu ◽  
Huale Zhang ◽  
Jianying Yan

Abstract Background Singleton low-risk pregnant women without obstetric or medical complications,can expect to terminate pregnancy by selective induced labor until 41 weeks later.But recent researches showed it is reasonable to offer elective induction of labor to low-risk nulliparous women 39 weeks 0 days of gestation, and this recommend need further research be conducted to measure the impact of this practice.The fundamental question is whether this operation will increase the additional risk of mother and fetus. Objective To investigate the effect of induced labor on maternal and fetal pregnancy outcome.Methods The method of this study is a retrospective case-control study.In this study, a total of 4386 pregnant women with singleton low-risk who underwent regular prenatal examination and successful vaginal delivery at or more than 41 weeks 0 days of gestation in Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. Review the clinical data,according to the mode of labor initiation, they were divided into induced labor group (2007 cases) and spontaneous onset of labor group (2361 cases). Further stratified analysis was carried out according to age and parity. Two-sample independent t-test and χ 2 test were used to analyze the differences of clinical characteristics such as maternal age and parity between the two groups. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the effect of induced labor on pregnancy outcome.Results The total duration of labor in the induced labor group was significantly longer than that in the spontaneous onset of labor group[ (9.37±5.37)vs (8.82±5.13)h,P<0.001],associated with more postpartum blood loss[ (219.18±188.32)vs (199.95±124.69)mL,P=0.01], and the incidence of severe postpartum hemorrhage(sPPH) was significantly higher[0.8%(16/2007) vs 0.33% (8/2361),P =0.041];increase but no significant difference in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage(PPH) [3.8 %(77/2007) vs 2.8% (66/2361),P =0.054].However,operative vaginal birth was more common in the induced labor group[3.8 %(77/2007) vs 2.8% (66/2361),P =0.054].Compared with spontaneous onset of labor,NICU admissions were higher with induction[3.8 %(77/2007) vs 2.8% (66/2361),P =0.054];but not significantly increase the risk of the third degree amniotic fluid contamination,placental abruption,birth weight and its distribution, sex of newborn, incidence of neonatal brain injury, incidence of neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal death, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal septicemia, neonatal pneumonia and Apgar ≤ 7 at birth (P>0.05). After adjusting for age, the operation of induced labor in nulliparous is more likely to occur PPH[2.74 %(55/2007) vs 1.65 %(39/2361);RR=1.557;95%CI:1.039~2.332,P<0.05].Conclusion Selective induction of labor increases the complications of mother and child.Low-risk pregnant women should try to avoid induction without medical indications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document