Abrupt Discontinuation From Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Massachusetts, 2015–2018

Author(s):  
Corinne A. Beaugard ◽  
Kenneth K.H. Chui ◽  
Marc R. Larochelle ◽  
Leonard D. Young ◽  
Alexander Y. Walley ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Claus Manniche ◽  
Lonny Stokholm ◽  
Sophie L. Ravn ◽  
Tonny A. Andersen ◽  
Lars Brandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie R. Gaither ◽  
Kirsha Gordon ◽  
Stephen Crystal ◽  
E. Jennifer Edelman ◽  
Robert D. Kerns ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e011619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S Merlin ◽  
Sarah R Young ◽  
Soraya Azari ◽  
William C Becker ◽  
Jane M Liebschutz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. S68-S69
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Eisenberg ◽  
Piyush Kalakoti ◽  
Nathan R. Hendrickson ◽  
Comron Saifi ◽  
Andrew J. Pugely

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S. Merlin ◽  
Kanan Patel ◽  
Nicole Thompson ◽  
Jennifer Kapo ◽  
Frank Keefe ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S1-S2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry Fine ◽  
Martin D. Cheatle

2011 ◽  
Vol 3;14 (2;3) ◽  
pp. 91-121
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Background: Even though opioids have been used for pain for thousands of years, opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain is controversial due to concerns regarding the long-term effectiveness and safety, particularly the risk of tolerance, dependance, or abuse. While the debate continues, the use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain has increased exponentially. Even though evidence is limited, multiple expert panels have concluded that chronic opioid therapy can be effective therapy for carefully selected and monitored patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Study Design: A systematic review of randomized trials of opioid management for chronic noncancer pain. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of opioids in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Methods: A comprehensive evaluation of the literature relating to opioids in chronic non-cancer pain was performed. The literature was evaluated according to Cochrane review criteria for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Jadad criteria. A literature search was conducted by using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, ECRI Institute Library, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website, U.S. National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), clinical trials, systematic reviews and cross references from systematic reviews. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and used by other systematic reviews and guidelines. Outcome Measures: Pain relief was the primary outcome measure. Other outcome measures were functional improvement, withdrawals, and adverse effects. Results: Based on the USPSTF criteria, the indicated level of evidence was fair for Tramadol in managing osteoarthritis. For all the drugs assessed, including Tramadol, for all other conditions, the evidence was poor based on either weak positive evidence, indeterminate evidence, or negative evidence. Limitations: A paucity of literature, specifically with follow-up beyond 12 weeks for all types of opioids with controlled trials for various chronic non-cancer pain conditions. Conclusions: This systematic review illustrated fair evidence for Tramadol in managing osteoarthritis with poor evidence for all other drugs and conditions. Thus, recommendations must be based on non-randomized studies. Key words: Chronic non-cancer pain, opioids, opioid efficacy, opioid effectiveness, significant pain relief, functional improvement, adverse effects, morphine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, tramadol, buprenorphine, methadone, tapentadol, oxycodone, oxymorphone, systematic reviews, randomized trials


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document