Abstract
Background
Clinical benefits of complete revascularization (CR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients are unclear. Moreover, the benefit of CR is unknown in AMI with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patient.
Objectives
We sought to compare prognosis of CR and incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients with AMI and multivessel disease, according to the presence of DM.
Methods
A total of 2,150 AMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were analyzed. CR was defined based on angiographic image. The primary endpoints of this study was patient oriented composite outcome (POCO) defined as a composite of all cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization within 3 years.
Results
Overall, 3-year POCO were significantly lower in patients receiving angiographic CR (985 patients, 45.8%) compared with IR (1165 patients, 54.2%). When divided into subgroups according to the presence of DM, CR reduced 3-year clinical outcomes in the non-DM group but not in the DM group (POCO: 11.7% vs. 23.2%, p<0.001, any revascularization: 7.2% vs. 10.8%, p=0.024 in the non-DM group, POCO: 24.3% vs. 27.8%, p=0.295, any revascularization: 13.3% vs. 11.3%, p=0.448 in the DM group, for CR vs. IR). Multivariate analysis showed that CR significantly reduced 3-year POCO (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.71) only in the non-DM group.
Conclusion
In AMI patients with multivessel disease, CR may be ineffective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with DM.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Worse Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Relevance to Impaired Endothelial Progenitor Cells Mobilization
