Prognosticators of All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Author(s):  
Jack B. Lopuszynski ◽  
Alicia J. Downing ◽  
Colleen M. Finley ◽  
Maliha Zahid
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Yukihito Sato ◽  
Tetsuya Takahashi ◽  
Miyuki Tsuchihashi-Makaya ◽  
Norihiko Kotooka ◽  
...  

Background: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves health-related quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure (HF). However, CR efficacy in patients with HF who are elderly, frail, or have HF with preserved ejection fraction remains unclear. We examined whether participation in multidisciplinary outpatient CR is associated with long-term survival and rehospitalization in patients with HF, with subgroup analysis by age, sex, comorbidities, frailty, and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed in patients hospitalized for acute HF at 15 hospitals in Japan, 2007 to 2016. The primary outcome (composite of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization after discharge) and secondary outcomes (all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization) were analyzed in outpatient CR program participants versus nonparticipants. Results: Of the 3277 patients, 26% (862) participated in outpatient CR. After propensity matching for potential confounders, 1592 patients were included (n=796 pairs), of which 511 had composite outcomes (223 [14%] all-cause deaths and 392 [25%] HF rehospitalizations, median 2.4-year follow-up). Hazard ratios associated with CR participation were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65–0.92) for composite outcome, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51–0.87) for all-cause mortality, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67–0.99) for HF-related rehospitalization. CR participation was also associated with numerically lower rates of composite outcome in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction or frail patients. Conclusions: Outpatient CR participation was associated with substantial prognostic benefit in a large HF cohort regardless of age, sex, comorbidities, frailty, and HF with preserved ejection fraction.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e044605
Author(s):  
Shiro Hoshida ◽  
Koichi Tachibana ◽  
Yukinori Shinoda ◽  
Tomoko Minamisaka ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe severity of diastolic dysfunction is assessed using a combination of several indices of left atrial (LA) volume overload and LA pressure overload. We aimed to clarify which overload is more associated with the prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).SettingA prospective, multicenter observational registry of collaborating hospitals in Osaka, Japan.ParticipantsWe enrolled hospitalised patients with HFpEF showing sinus rhythm (men, 79; women, 113). Blood tests and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before discharge. The ratio of diastolic elastance (Ed) to arterial elastance (Ea) was used as a relative index of LA pressure overload.Primary outcome measuresAll-cause mortality and admission for heart failure were evaluated at >1 year after discharge.ResultsIn the multivariable Cox regression analysis, Ed/Ea, but not LA volume index, was significantly associated with all-cause mortality or admission for heart failure (HR 2.034, 95% CI 1.059 to 3.907, p=0.032), independent of age, sex, and the serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. In patients with a higher NT-proBNP level, the effect of higher Ed/Ea on prognosis was prominent (p=0.015).ConclusionsEd/Ea, an index of LA pressure overload, was significantly associated with the prognosis in elderly patients with HFpEF showing sinus rhythm.Trial registration numberUMIN000021831.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Fu ◽  
A Uijl ◽  
F.W Dekker ◽  
L.H Lund ◽  
G Savarese ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Beta-blockers reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) were underrepresented in landmark trials. Purpose We evaluated if beta-blockers are associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD, and if potential benefits of beta-blockers would extend also to HFpEF and HFmrEF with advanced CKD. Methods We identified 3906 persons with an ejection fraction <40% and advanced CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry during 2001–2016. We did not exclude patients with atrial fibrillation. The associations between beta-blocker use, 5-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of time to cardiovascular (CV) mortality/first HF hospitalization were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. Analyses were adjusted for 36 variables, including demographics, laboratory measures, comorbidities, medication use, medical procedures, and socioeconomic status. To assess consistency, the same analyses were performed in a positive control cohort of 12,673 patients with moderate CKD (eGFR <60–30 mL/min/1.73m2). Analyses were repeated in individuals with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥50%) or midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF; EF 40–49%). Results In HFrEF and advanced CKD, 89% received beta-blockers. Overall, median (IQR) age was 81 (74–86) years, 36% were women and median eGFR was 26 (20–28) ml/min/1.73m2. During a median of 1.3 years follow-up, 2086 (53.4%) individuals had a subsequent HF hospitalization, and 2954 (75.6%) individuals died, of which 2089 (70.1%) due to cardiovascular causes. Beta-blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in 5-year all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–0.96)] and CV mortality/HF hospitalization (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77–0.98). The magnitude of the associations between beta-blocker use and outcomes was similar to that observed for HFrEF patients with mild/moderate CKD [all-cause mortality: 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.91); CV mortality/HF hospitalization: 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.96)]. Adjusted HRs were 0.88 (95% CI 0.77–1.02) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.92–1.24) for individuals with HFpEF and advanced CKD and 0.95 (95% CI 0.80–1.13) and 1.13 (95% CI 0.94–1.36) for individuals with HFmrEF and advanced CKD, for all-cause mortality and CV mortality/HF hospitalization, respectively. Conclusion Despite lack of trial evidence, the use of beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD was high in routine Swedish care, and was independently associated with reduced mortality to the same degree as HFrEF with moderate CKD. However, these benefits were not observed in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF with severe CKD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Lee Zheng ◽  
Fiona T Chan ◽  
Adam A Nabeebaccus ◽  
Ajay M Shah ◽  
Theresa McDonagh ◽  
...  

BackgroundClinical drug trials in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction have failed to demonstrate improvements in mortality.MethodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials (RCT) assessing pharmacological treatments in patients with heart failure with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction≥40% from January 1996 to May 2016. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, exercise capacity (6-min walk distance, exercise duration, VO2 max), quality of life and biomarkers (B-type natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled relative risks (RR) for the binary outcomes, and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes, with 95% CI.ResultsWe included data from 25 RCTs comprising data for 18101 patients. All-cause mortality was reduced with beta-blocker therapy compared with placebo (RR: 0.78, 95%CI 0.65 to 0.94, p=0.008). There was no effect seen with ACE inhibitors, aldosterone receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and other drug classes, compared with placebo. Similar results were observed for cardiovascular mortality. No single drug class reduced heart failure hospitalisation compared with placebo.ConclusionThe efficacy of treatments in patients with heart failure and an LV ejection fraction≥40% differ depending on the type of therapy, with beta-blockers demonstrating reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Further trials are warranted to confirm treatment effects of beta-blockers in this patient group.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiro Hoshida ◽  
Yukinori Shinoda ◽  
koichi tachibana ◽  
Tomoko Minamisaka ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
...  

Objective: We aimed to clarify the differences in the significance of the ratio of diastolic elastance (Ed) to arterial elastance (Ea), [Ed/Ea=(E/e’)/(0.9 х systolic blood pressure)], a relative index of left atrial (LA) pressure overload, in relation to N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level on prognosis between patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with and without atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We studied 297 HFpEF patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (sinus rhythm/AF: 192/105). Blood testing and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before discharge. All-cause mortality was evaluated at >1 year after discharge. Results: During a median follow-up of 626 days, 47 patients (sinus rhythm/AF: 30/17) had all-cause mortality. In the subgroup with sinus rhythm, but not AF, Ed/Ea was significantly higher in patients with than without all-cause mortality. In a multivariate Cox hazard analysis, Ed/Ea was significantly associated with all-cause mortality independent of NT-proBNP in patients with sinus rhythm, but not with AF. Among patients with higher NT-proBNP levels, the effect of higher Ed/Ea on prognosis was prominent only in those with sinus rhythm (p=0.037). Conclusions: Ed/Ea provides additional prognostic information to serum NT-proBNP level for predicting all-cause mortality only in HFpEF patients with sinus rhythm. The prognostic risk factors differed between elderly HFpEF patients with and without AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document