Tombstone Sign in an Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 140-141
Author(s):  
Mazen M. Kawji ◽  
D. Luke Glancy
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2199611
Author(s):  
Evelyne Sandjojo ◽  
Vanessa AMC Jaury ◽  
Yufi K Astari ◽  
Mahendria Sukmana ◽  
Rizky A Haeruman ◽  
...  

Inferior wall myocardial infarction occurs in approximately 50% of all myocardial infarctions. The most common conduction disorder of this disease is complete atrioventricular block. Immediate attention must be given to the myocardial infarction patients with conduction block due to the increased mortality rate in these patients. Temporary pacemaker implantation and permanent pacemaker implantation are recommended in complete atrioventricular block cases that do not improve with reperfusion. In this case report, a 64-year-old-female patient came to the emergency department of a rural General Hospital with complaints of epigastric pain, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting for 2 days before admission. She had uncontrolled hypertension without a history of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, or a family history of heart disease. The electrocardiogram displayed an acute inferior wall myocardial infarction and complete atrioventricular block with escape junctional rhythm with a heart rate of 17 bpm. She was diagnosed with nonreperfused inferior wall myocardial infarction and a complete atrioventricular block. She was successfully treated with only dopamine and epinephrine as the definitive treatment because the patient refused to be referred to a tertiary hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention and pacemaker implantation due to financial reasons. Dopamine and epinephrine may be considered for complete atrioventricular block if transfer to a higher level of care is not feasible and as bridge therapy while waiting for transfer.


Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (24) ◽  
pp. e10889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Liang ◽  
Lan Wu ◽  
Yingchen Li ◽  
Yidi Zeng ◽  
Zhixi Hu ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Sung Woo Park ◽  
Bong Min Ko ◽  
Kwang Hee Lee ◽  
Chul Hyun Kim ◽  
Tae Myoung Choi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afonso Celso Pereira ◽  
Roberto Alexandre Franken ◽  
Sandra Regina Schwarzwälder Sprovieri ◽  
Valdir Golin

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty regarding the risk of major complications in patients with left ventricular (LV) infarction complicated by right ventricular (RV) involvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on hospital mortality and morbidity of right ventricular involvement among patients with acute left ventricular myocardial infarction. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study, at Emergency Care Unit of Hospital Central da Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. METHODS: 183 patients with acute myocardial infarction participated in this study: 145 with LV infarction alone and 38 with both LV and RV infarction. The presence of complications and hospital death were compared between groups. RESULTS: 21% of the patients studied had LV + RV infarction. In this group, involvement of the dorsal and/or inferior wall was predominant on electrocardiogram (p < 0.0001). The frequencies of Killip class IV upon admission and 24 hours later were greater in the LV + RV group, along with electrical and hemodynamic complications, among others, and death. The probability of complications among the LV + RV patients was 9.7 times greater (odds ratio, OR = 9.7468; 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.8673 to 33.1325; p < 0.0001) and probability of death was 5.1 times greater (OR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.2795 to 11.5510; p = 0.0001), in relation to patients with LV infarction alone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LV infarction with RV involvement present increased risk of early morbidity and mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document