scholarly journals Multi-cancer screening tests: communicating about risks should be prioritized.

Author(s):  
Timothée Olivier ◽  
Jenny Gill ◽  
Vinay Prasad
2021 ◽  
pp. 096914132199942
Author(s):  
Austin Snyder ◽  
Sean Jang ◽  
Ilana S Nazari ◽  
Avik Som ◽  
Efren J Flores ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to delays in cancer diagnosis, in part due to postponement of cancer screening. We used Google Trends data to assess public attention to cancer screening during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Search volume for terms related to established cancer screening tests (“colonoscopy,” “mammogram,” “lung cancer screening,” and “pap smear”) showed a marked decrease of up to 76% compared to the pre-pandemic period, a significantly greater drop than for search volume for terms denoting common chronic diseases. Maintaining awareness of cancer screening during future public health crises may decrease delays in cancer diagnosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. e191156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivan J. Mehta ◽  
Rebecca S. Pepe ◽  
Nicole B. Gabler ◽  
Mounika Kanneganti ◽  
Catherine Reitz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azra Izanloo ◽  
Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan ◽  
Fahimeh Khoshroo ◽  
Maryam Erfani Haghiri ◽  
Sara Izanloo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djenaba A. Joseph ◽  
Jessica B. King ◽  
Thomas B. Richards ◽  
Cheryll C. Thomas ◽  
Lisa C. Richardson

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diama Bhadra Vale ◽  
Talita Lourenço Menin ◽  
Joana Froes Bragança ◽  
Julio Cesar Teixeira ◽  
Lucas Almeida Cavalcante ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A Brazilian guideline on cervical cancer screening was released in 2011. The objective was to verify changes in screening indicators around this period. Methods An audit study which sample was all screening tests performed by the public health system of Campinas city from 2010 to 2016. Variables were absolute tests numbers, excess tests, intervals and results, by age. For trend analysis was used Cochran-Armitage × 2 and linear regression. Results Were carried out 62,925 tests in 2010 and 43,523 tests in 2016, a tendency at a reduction (P = 0.001). Excess tests were higher than 50% over the years, with a tendency at a reduction (P < 0.001). Tests performed on women under 25 ranged from 20.2 to 15.4% in the period (P < 0.001), while in the 25–64 years age-group, it ranged from 75.1 to 80.2% (P < 0.001). In 2010 the most frequent interval was annual (47.5%) and in 2016 biennial (34.7%). There was a tendency at a reduction in the proportion of tests performed at the first time and those with an annual interval (P < 0.001), and also a tendency at an increase in tests with intervals equal to or greater than biannual (P < 0.001). We observed a tendency at a reduction in LSIL and HSIL-CIN2 results (P = 0.04 and P = 0.001, respectively), and a tendency at an increase in HSIL-CIN3 result (P = 0.02). Conclusion The proportion of cervical cancer screening tests performed out of the recommendation showed a significant reduction in the period. This indicates a tendency to align cervical cancer screening in Campinas with the standards recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document