Auditory testing outcomes with hearing aids in patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 103057
Author(s):  
Firas Sbeih ◽  
Donald M. Goldberg ◽  
Sara Liu ◽  
Maxwell Y. Lee ◽  
Gina Stillitano ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 839-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijaya Kumar Narne ◽  
Prashanth Prabhu ◽  
Hunsur S. Chandan ◽  
Mahadeva Deepthi

Background: There are many studies reported in the literature that have summarized audiological findings and possible rehabilitation in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). However, there are very few studies that have attempted to delineate the gender differences in audiological characteristics and hearing aid benefit in individuals with ANSD. Purpose: The study aimed to explore the differences between males and females in terms of demographic details, audiogram, speech identification scores, otoacoustic emissions, acoustic reflexes, long latency responses, and hearing aid benefit. Research Design: A retrospective study. Study Sample: A total of 255 individuals diagnosed with ANSD were selected for the study. The study included 137 females and 88 males. Data Collection and Analysis: The demographic details, results of diagnostic audiological testing, and hearing aid benefit were analyzed retrospectively. The differences in findings across gender were compared. Results: The study shows that females have a relatively higher degree of hearing loss and that the majority of females show a rising type of audiometric configuration. The study shows that females have poorer speech perception abilities and experience limited benefits from hearing aids compared to males. Conclusions: The results of the study show that there are gender differences in audiological findings and hearing aid benefits in individuals with ANSD. However, well-controlled prospective studies are essential to confirm the results obtained and to identify the possible mechanisms underlying the gender differences.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashanth Prabhu ◽  
Animesh Barman

Introduction The studies on hearing aid benefit in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) shows limited benefit. Low cut modified amplification is found to be effective in few individuals with ANSD. With advancement in technology, receiver in the canal (RIC) hearing aids have proven to be more effective than traditional behind the ear (BTE) hearing aids. Objective Thus, the present study attempts to determine the effectiveness of low cut modified amplification using RIC and BTE. Method Twenty participants with ANSD were fitted with BTE and RIC using traditional and low cut modified amplification. We divided them into good and poor performers based on unaided speech identification scores (SIS). We then compared aided SIS and aided benefit across conditions in good and poor performers with ANSD across both conditions using BTE and RIC. Results The results of the study showed that the aided performance improved with low cut modified amplification in both BTE and RIC hearing aids. The improvement noticed with low-cut modified fitting with RIC was significant in more than BTE, especially in good performers with ANSD. Conclusion The improved clarity and naturalness of sound with RIC may have led to better aided scores and better acceptance of the hearing aid. Thus, low-cut modified amplification, preferably with RIC, needs to be attempted in fitting individuals with ANSD, especially in those with good unaided SIS in quiet.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 162-168
Author(s):  
Sreebha Sreedhar ◽  
Nihala K P ◽  
Aleesha M H

Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder is a rare condition wherein neural transmission through the VIIIth nerve and auditory brainstem is disrupted with intact peripheral hearing. Most frequently reported symptoms by individuals suffering from such conditions include impaired speech discrimination especially in presence of background noise. The aim of this single case study is to emphasize the effectiveness of channel-free technology as a rehabilitative option and to demonstrate the improvement in speech perception in noise with noise desensitisation training. A 24-year-old male patient reported to the National Institute of Speech and Hearing with the complaint of poor speech comprehension. The audiological profile revealed, bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss in pure tone audiometry with poor speech discrimination scores, bilateral ‘A’ type tympanogram with absent acoustic reflexes, good signal to noise ratio in otoacoustic emissions, and absent Auditory Brainstem Response at 95 dBnHL bilaterally suggestive of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder in both the ears. As a part of rehabilitation, hearing aids with multiple channels and channel-free technology were tried and better speech discrimination scores were obtained with channel-free technology. In order to address poor speech discrimination in presence of noise, noise desensitisation training was given at different Signal to Noise Ratio with channel-free hearing aids and was found to be effective in improving the speech discrimination scores especially in adverse listening conditions. Key words: Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, Channel free hearing aid, Noise desensitisation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 396-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett Cardon ◽  
Julia Campbell ◽  
Anu Sharma

The developing auditory cortex is highly plastic. As such, the cortex is both primed to mature normally and at risk for reorganizing abnormally, depending upon numerous factors that determine central maturation. From a clinical perspective, at least two major components of development can be manipulated: (1) input to the cortex and (2) the timing of cortical input. Children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) have provided a model of early deprivation of sensory input to the cortex and demonstrated the resulting plasticity and development that can occur upon introduction of stimulation. In this article, we review several fundamental principles of cortical development and plasticity and discuss the clinical applications in children with SNHL and ANSD who receive intervention with hearing aids and/or cochlear implants.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 204-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Walker ◽  
Ryan McCreery ◽  
Meredith Spratford ◽  
Patricia Roush

Background: Up to 15% of children with permanent hearing loss (HL) have auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), which involves normal outer hair cell function and disordered afferent neural activity in the auditory nerve or brainstem. Given the varying presentations of ANSD in children, there is a need for more evidence-based research on appropriate clinical interventions for this population. Purpose: This study compared the speech production, speech perception, and language outcomes of children with ANSD, who are hard of hearing, to children with similar degrees of mild-to-moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), all of whom were fitted with bilateral hearing aids (HAs) based on the American Academy of Audiology pediatric amplification guidelines. Research Design: Speech perception and communication outcomes data were gathered in a prospective accelerated longitudinal design, with entry into the study between six mo and seven yr of age. Three sites were involved in participant recruitment: Boys Town National Research Hospital, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the University of Iowa. Study Sample: The sample consisted of 12 children with ANSD and 22 children with SNHL. The groups were matched based on better-ear pure-tone average, better-ear aided speech intelligibility index, gender, maternal education level, and newborn hearing screening result (i.e., pass or refer). Data Collection and Analysis: Children and their families participated in an initial baseline visit, followed by visits twice a year for children <2 yr of age and once a yr for children >2 yr of age. Paired-sample t-tests were used to compare children with ANSD to children with SNHL. Results: Paired t-tests indicated no significant differences between the ANSD and SNHL groups on language and articulation measures. Children with ANSD displayed functional speech perception skills in quiet. Although the number of participants was too small to conduct statistical analyses for speech perception testing, there appeared to be a trend in which the ANSD group performed more poorly in background noise with HAs, compared to the SNHL group. Conclusions: The American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guidelines recommend that children with ANSD receive an HA trial if their behavioral thresholds are sufficiently high enough to impede speech perception at conversational levels. For children with ANSD in the mild-to-severe HL range, the current results support this recommendation, as children with ANSD can achieve functional outcomes similar to peers with SNHL.


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 109757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Meleca ◽  
Gina Stillitano ◽  
Maxwell Y. Lee ◽  
Whitney Lyle ◽  
Yi-Chun Carol Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document