Pigeons remember visual landmarks after one release and rely upon them more if they are anosmic

2020 ◽  
Vol 166 ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gagliardo ◽  
Enrica Pollonara ◽  
Martin Wikelski
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Zhe Xin ◽  
Yinghao Cai ◽  
Tao Lu ◽  
Xiaoxia Xing ◽  
Shaojun Cai ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Cordova ◽  
Carl Gabbard ◽  
Priscila Caçola

Physiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Warrant ◽  
Marie Dacke

Despite their tiny eyes and brains, nocturnal insects have evolved a remarkable capacity to visually navigate at night. Whereas some use moonlight or the stars as celestial compass cues to maintain a straight-line course, others use visual landmarks to navigate to and from their nest. These impressive abilities rely on highly sensitive compound eyes and specialized visual processing strategies in the brain.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Schütz ◽  
Vishal Bharmauria ◽  
Xiaogang Yan ◽  
Hongying Wang ◽  
Frank Bremmer ◽  
...  

SummaryVisual landmarks influence spatial cognition [1–3], navigation [4,5] and goal-directed behavior [6–8], but their influence on visual coding in sensorimotor systems is poorly understood [6,9–11]. We hypothesized that visual responses in frontal cortex control gaze areas encode potential targets in an intermediate gaze-centered / landmark-centered reference frame that might depend on specific target-landmark configurations rather than a global mechanism. We tested this hypothesis by recording neural activity in the frontal eye fields (FEF) and supplementary eye fields (SEF) while head-unrestrained macaques engaged in a memory-delay gaze task. Visual response fields (the area of visual space where targets modulate activity) were tested for each neuron in the presence of a background landmark placed at one of four oblique configurations relative to the target stimulus. 102 of 312 FEF and 43 of 256 SEF neurons showed spatially tuned response fields in this task. We then fit these data against a mathematical continuum between a gaze-centered model and a landmark-centered model. When we pooled data across the entire dataset for each neuron, our response field fits did not deviate significantly from the gaze-centered model. However, when we fit response fields separately for each target-landmark configuration, the best fits shifted (mean 37% / 40%) toward landmark-centered coding in FEF / SEF respectively. This confirmed an intermediate gaze / landmark-centered mechanism dependent on local (configuration-dependent) interactions. Overall, these data show that external landmarks influence prefrontal visual responses, likely helping to stabilize gaze goals in the presence of variable eye and head orientations.HighlightsPrefrontal visual responses recorded in the presence of visual landmarksResponse fields showed intermediate gaze / landmark-centered organizationThis influence depended on specific target-landmark configurations


Ethology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 867-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Cannicci ◽  
Sara Fratini ◽  
Marco Vannini

Author(s):  
Brian Coltin ◽  
Jesse Fusco ◽  
Zack Moratto ◽  
Oleg Alexandrov ◽  
Robert Nakamura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document