Antiretroviral Postexposure Prophylaxis After Sexual, Injection-Drug Use, Or Other Nonoccupational Exposure to HIV in the United States

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-84 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Wu ◽  
Yunfeng Tie ◽  
Sharoda Dasgupta ◽  
Linda Beer ◽  
Ruthanne Marcus

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie W. Suen ◽  
Peter J. Davidson ◽  
Erica N. Browne ◽  
Barrot H. Lambdin ◽  
Lynn D. Wenger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark A. R. Kleiman ◽  
Jonathan P. Caulkins ◽  
Angela Hawken

The devastation wrought by drugs and drug dealing is familiar from the daily news and carefully documented in academic journals. Illegal drugs get the most attention. A quarter of 14- to 15-year-olds in the United States have already tried an illegal drug. Injection drug use...


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison B Rapoport ◽  
Leah S Fischer ◽  
Scott Santibanez ◽  
Susan E Beekmann ◽  
Philip M Polgreen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In the context of the opioid epidemic, injection drug use (IDU)–related infections are an escalating health issue for infectious diseases (ID) physicians in the United States. Methods We conducted a mixed methods survey of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Emerging Infections Network between February and April 2017 to evaluate perspectives relating to care of persons who inject drugs (PWID). Topics included the frequency of and management strategies for IDU-related infection, the availability of addiction services, and the evolving role of ID physicians in substance use disorder (SUD) management. Results More than half (53%, n = 672) of 1273 network members participated. Of these, 78% (n = 526) reported treating PWID. Infections frequently encountered included skin and soft tissue (62%, n = 324), bacteremia/fungemia (54%, n = 281), and endocarditis (50%, n = 263). In the past year, 79% (n = 416) reported that most IDU-related infections required ≥2 weeks of parenteral antibiotics; strategies frequently employed for prolonged treatment included completion of the entire course in the inpatient unit (41%, n = 218) or at another supervised facility (35%, n = 182). Only 35% (n = 184) of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that their health system offered comprehensive SUD management; 46% (n = 242) felt that ID providers should actively manage SUD. Conclusions The majority of physicians surveyed treated PWID and reported myriad obstacles to providing care. Public health and health care systems should consider ways to support ID physicians caring for PWID, including (1) guidelines for providing complex care, including safe provision of multiweek parenteral antibiotics; (2) improved access to SUD management; and (3) strategies to assist those interested in roles in SUD management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 1732-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexia Y Zhang ◽  
Sarah Shrum ◽  
Sabrina Williams ◽  
Sarah Petnic ◽  
Joelle Nadle ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Injection drug use (IDU) is a known, but infrequent risk factor on candidemia; however, the opioid epidemic and increases in IDU may be changing the epidemiology of candidemia. Methods Active population-based surveillance for candidemia was conducted in selected US counties. Cases of candidemia were categorized as IDU cases if IDU was indicated in the medical records in the 12 months prior to the date of initial culture. Results During 2017, 1191 candidemia cases were identified in patients aged >12 years (incidence: 6.9 per 100 000 population); 128 (10.7%) had IDU history, and this proportion was especially high (34.6%) in patients with candidemia aged 19–44. Patients with candidemia and IDU history were younger than those without (median age, 35 vs 63 years; P < .001). Candidemia cases involving recent IDU were less likely to have typical risk factors including malignancy (7.0% vs 29.4%; relative risk [RR], 0.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .1–.5]), abdominal surgery (3.9% vs 17.5%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, .09–.5]), and total parenteral nutrition (3.9% vs 22.5%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, .07–.4]). Candidemia cases with IDU occurred more commonly in smokers (68.8% vs 18.5%; RR, 3.7 [95% CI, 3.1–4.4]), those with hepatitis C (54.7% vs 6.4%; RR, 8.5 [95% CI, 6.5–11.3]), and in people who were homeless (13.3% vs 0.8%; RR, 15.7 [95% CI, 7.1–34.5]). Conclusions Clinicians should consider injection drug use as a risk factor in patients with candidemia who lack typical candidemia risk factors, especially in those with who are 19–44 years of age and have community-associated candidemia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document