Colonic Contrast Versus Oral Contrast Abdominal Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: Assessing the Impact on Emergency Department Throughput Time and Patient Satisfaction

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
E.R. Berg ◽  
P. Mitchell ◽  
S.D. Mehta ◽  
L. Oyama ◽  
J. Easow ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-11
Author(s):  
Abbas AR Mohamed ◽  
Safaa A Mobarki ◽  
Ashwag H Al Qabasani ◽  
Nusiba A Al Shingiti ◽  
Alaa A El Sayed

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of combined Alvarado scoring system and selective computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of suspected cases of acute appendicitis. Material and methods: This study was conducted during the period March 2018 to January 2020 at Prince Mohammed bin Abdul-Aziz hospital (NGHA) in Al Madinah, KSA. It is a prospective study involving 100 consecutive patients attending the emergency department with right iliac fossa pain, excluding children below the age of 14 years and pregnant women. All patients were initially assessed by the Alvarado scoring system, and the result of each patient was recorded in a separate predesigned data sheath. Based on the patient's calculated Alvarado scores, patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (score ≤ 4), Group B (score 5-6), and group C (score ≥ 7). All patients in group A were discharged from the emergency department with instruction to return if their symptoms persist or get worse while all patients in group B had an abdominal multidetector CT scan (MDCT) with IV contrast and no oral contrast to help the diagnosis. Group C patients had surgery without further investigation. Alvarado scores were compared to intraoperative findings and histopathological examination of the removed appendix in those who were operated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the scoring system in each group were calculated with special reference to the role of CT scan in improving the diagnostic accuracy of the scoring system in the middle group (group B). Result: 58 patients were male and 42 were female. Age range between 14 and 43 years with median age 24 years. Out of the 100 patients, 14 (8 males, 6 females) belonged to Group A, 23 (11 males, 12 females) to Group B and 63 (39 males, 24 females) to group C. Two patients from group A (one male and one female) were returned with worsening symptoms and subsequently operated for acute appendicitis. CT scan established the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in 16 out of the patients of group B with subsequent histological confirmation of acute appendicitis in 15 of them. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in 32 out of 63 patients of group C. Conclusion: Alvarado score has a high accuracy of ruling in and out acute appendicitis at the extremes of the score (≤7 and ≥4), however, the accuracy of the score to confirm or rule out acute appendicitis in the middle group (5 -6) is significantly low. Selective utilization of CT scan in patients in the middle of the score improves the diagnostic accuracy of the score and limits overutilization of CT scan in the other patients at the extremes of the score saving patients unnecessary exposure to radiation and health authorities’ time and cost without increasing the rate of negative appendectomy.


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Guarisco ◽  
Stefoni A. Bavin

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a case study testing the Primary Provider Theory proposed by Aragon that states that: disproportionate to any other variables, patient satisfaction is distinctly and primarily linked to physician behaviors and secondarily to waiting times.Design/methodology/approachThe case study began by creating incentives motivating physicians to reflect and improve behaviors (patient interactions) and practice patterns (workflow efficiency). The Press Ganey Emergency Department Survey was then utilized to track the impact of the incentive programs and to ascertain any relationship between patient satisfaction with the provider and global patient satisfaction with emergency department visits by measuring patient satisfaction over an eight quarter period.FindingsThe findings were two‐fold: firstly, the concept of “pay for performance” as a tool for physician motivation was valid; and secondly, the impact on global patient satisfaction by increases in patient satisfaction with the primary provider was significant and highly correlated, as proposed by Aragon.Practical implicationsThese findings can encourage hospitals and physician groups to place a high value on the performance of primary providers of patient care, provide incentives for appropriate provider behaviors through “pay for performance” programs and promote physician understanding of the links between global patient satisfaction with physician behaviors and business growth, malpractice reduction, and other key measures of business success.Originality/valueThere are no other case studies prior to this project validating the Primary Provider Theory in an urban medical center; this project adds to the validity and credibility of the theory in this setting.


2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. S49
Author(s):  
L.H. Merck ◽  
K. Heilpern ◽  
D. Houry ◽  
M. Holdsworth ◽  
L.A. Ward ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Samimi ◽  
Arash Safaie ◽  
Mehran Sotoodehnia ◽  
Fatemeh Rasooli ◽  
Atefeh Abdollahi

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1002-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.O. Vu Huynh ◽  
Fariborz Lalezarzadeh ◽  
Shokry Lawandy ◽  
David T. Wong ◽  
Victor C. Joe

Several studies report sensitivity and specificity of abdominal computed tomography scans (CT) for the evaluation of acute appendicitis as high as 98 per cent. Despite increased utilization of CT, the rate of negative appendectomy has remained constant at 10 to 20 per cent. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of CT in the evaluation of acute and perforated appendicitis in an academic community-based setting. A retrospective review of 550 patient charts with International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) codes for acute and perforated appendicitis from January 2002 to October 2005 was performed. Sensitivity of CT was 87 per cent with a positive predictive value of 92 per cent. Specificity was 42 per cent with a negative predictive value of 29 per cent. Negative appendectomy rates were similar with or without CT (11% vs 13%, respectively). Our data suggests that CT used liberally in everyday practice in a community-based setting to evaluate acute appendicitis may not have as strong of a diagnostic value as those used in protocol-driven research studies. Further prospective studies are needed to formulate criteria to better delineate the role of CT in the evaluation of acute appendicitis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2130-2135
Author(s):  
Yong Liu ◽  
Tuo Su ◽  
Ping Wei ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
Zhili Ji

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the imaging features of abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) in patients with surgical acute abdominal perforation and to improve the diagnostic ability of perforated acute appendicitis (PAA). Method: Patients with suspected acute appendicitis and abdominal pain are selected as the study objects. According to the surgical records and pathological results, the patients are divided into PAA group and nonperforated acute appendicitis (NPAA) group. All patients are examined by abdominal CT. Postprocessing reconstruction technology such as multiple planar reconstruction (MPR) algorithm and curved planar reformat (CPR) algorithm are used as assistance to display the appendix, analyze and compare the images, observe the image performance of abdominal CT, and measure the diameter of the appendix. Results: The incidence of PAA specific signs (i.e. cellulitis around the appendix, abscess around the appendix, enhancement defect of the appendix wall, air accumulation outside the appendix cavity, fecal stone outside the appendix cavity) in PAA group is significantly higher than that in NPAA group (P < 0.05). Appearance of at least one specific sign for the diagnosis of PAA is 95.65%, the specificity is 92.59%, and the accuracy is 94.00%. The diameter of appendix in PAA group is significantly larger than that in NPAA group (P < 0.05). Compared with the diagnosis of simple specific signs, the specificity and accuracy of the combination of appendiceal diameter and specific signs in the diagnosis of PAA have been improved. Conclusion: With the help of MPR algorithm and CPR algorithm, abdominal CT imaging technology can accurately identify PAA and NPAA, which has important diagnostic value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document