Plutonium isotopic composition of high burnup spent fuel discharged from light water reactors

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 2689-2697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Nakano ◽  
Tsutomu Okubo
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Vladimir A. Eliseev ◽  
Dmitry A. Klinov ◽  
Noël Camarcat ◽  
David Lemasson ◽  
Clement Mériot ◽  
...  

Accumulation of plutonium extracted from the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) of light water reactors is one of the central problems in nuclear power. To reduce out-of-the-reactor Pu inventory, leading nuclear power countries (France, Japan) use plutonium in light water power reactors in the form of MOX fuel, with half of Pu fissioning in this fuel. The rest of Pu cannot be reused easily and efficiently in light water reactors because of the high content of even isotopes. Plutonium for which there are no potential consumers is accumulated. Unlike thermal reactors, fast reactors take plutonium of any isotopic composition. That makes it possible to improve plutonium isotopic composition and to reduce the fraction of even isotopes to the level that allows reuse of such plutonium in thermal reactors. The idea of changing the isotopic composition of Pu in fast reactors is well-known. The originality of the research lies in applying this idea to combine the fuel cycles of fast and thermal reactors. Pu isotopic composition can be improved by combining certain operational activities in order to supply fuel to thermal and fast reactors. Scientific and technological justification of the possibility will let Russian BN technologies and French MOX fuel technologies work in synergy with thermal reactors.


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (16) ◽  
pp. 1919-1932
Author(s):  
Vladimir Barchevtsev ◽  
Vladimir Artisyuk ◽  
Hisashi Ninokata

2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (13) ◽  
pp. 1616-1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Smirnov ◽  
G. A. Sulaberidze ◽  
P. N. Alekseev ◽  
A. A. Dudnikov ◽  
V. A. Nevinitsa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. E. Thomas ◽  
J. M. McCarthy ◽  
E. R. Gilbert

The possibility that spent fuel from commercial light-water reactors (LWRs) may be stored for extended periods before reprocessing or permanant disposal has led to interest to its oxidation behavior in air. Oxidation weight gain tests at 150 to 250°C indicate that spent LWR fuel oxidizes 10 to 100 times more rapidly than unirradiated UO2, but is much slower to break up into U3O8 powder. To gain insight into the mechanisms that control oxidation in spent fuel, pre- and post oxidation samples were examined by transmission electron microscopy.


Author(s):  
Philippe Dehaudt

Abstract This review focuses on the current knowledge, updated at the end of 1999, about the physicochemical state of the fuels leaving light water reactors, and particularly pressurized water reactors in France. Accessible data in the scientific literature, or those acquired at the CEA, are particularly numerous. Their analysis and their synthesis are joined together to constitute a collection of references intended to the specialists in nuclear fuel and for all those which contribute to the studies on the storage or final disposal of the irradiated fuel.


Author(s):  
Gray S. Chang ◽  
Robert C. Pedersen

One of challenge to burn the WG-Pu in Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel in light water reactors (LWR) is to demonstrate that the differences between WG-MOX, RG-MOX, and LWR LEU fuel are minimal, and therefore, the commercial MOX and LEU fuel experience base is applicable. The MCWO-calculated Radial Power Profile of LEU, Weapons Grade-MOX and Reactor Grade-MOX fuel pellets at various burnups are similar toward the end of life (50 GWd/t). Therefore, the LEU fuel performance evaluation code — FRAPCON-3 with modifications, such as, the detailed fission power profiles versus burnup, can be used in the MOX fuel pellet performance analysis. MCWO also calculated the 240Pu/Pu ratio in WG-MOX versus burnup, which reaches an average of 31.25% at discharged burnup of 50 GWd/t. It meets the spent fuel standard for WG-Pu disposition in LWR.


2007 ◽  
Vol 1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Thompson Motta

AbstractThe proposed designs of GenIV reactors call for high operating temperatures and long exposure times, aimed at increasing thermal efficiency, enabling hydrogen production, decreasing waste and increasing safety, among other goals. These requirements will require imply the materials will be subjected to higher radiation damage doses than seen in light water reactors, requiring an even higher degree of alloys stability. In addition the higher temperatures and exposure times in corrosive environments will require much higher corrosion resistance than current materials. One of the main challenges of designing these materials is that our ability to predict material response in the face of the synergistic effects of temperature, radiation damage and a corrosive environment is limited. However, efforts are underway to understand mechanistically the degradation processes so that they can be extrapolated to conditions beyond the experimental database.In this context, it is interesting to consider the effort made by the nuclear power industry to qualify nuclear fuel for operation at higher burnup in existing light water reactors. In the last two decades, the average discharge burnup of nuclear fuel in light water reactors has increased almost two fold, thereby increasing the reactor exposure time and the amount of radiation damage withstood by the cladding. Experience has shown that the material degradation rates can increase at high burnup, sometimes through the synergistic operation of various processes. Two examples will be given to illustrate the complexity of the problem:(i) The rate of irradiation growth of zirconium alloys increases significantly at high burnup. The mechanism has been shown to depend on the amorphization of intermetallic ZrCrFe precipitates with consequent release of Fe into the Zr matrix. This has been shown to help nucleate component dislocation loops which preferentially absorb vacancies, thereby increasing the net rate of growth. This causes the interstitial and vacancy fluxes both to contribute towards irradiation growth, thus increasing the rate.(ii) One of the most significant obstacles to approval of cladding operation at high burnup is difficulty in the evaluation of the behavior of the fuel during a reactivity initiated accident (RIA). The degradation of the mechanical properties of the zirconium cladding with increasing corrosion and consequent hydrogen ingress, the radiation damage and the microstructure evolution in the fuel all have to be taken into account in evaluating the likelihood of severe fuel failure at high burnup. This problem is still being addressed in various research programs.Such mechanisms and the efforts to qualify nuclear fuel for higher burnup in light water reactors will be reviewed as a means of illustrating the challenges (known and unknown) faced by GenIV reactor materials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document