scholarly journals Palliative Care Practices of Community Health Workers and Professional Nurses in Limpopo Province, South Africa

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
C. Campbell ◽  
L. Ware ◽  
J. Stueve ◽  
M.K. O'Brien
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Jobson ◽  
Nireshni Naidoo ◽  
Nthabiseng Matlakala ◽  
Gert Marincowitz ◽  
Jean Railton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Community health workers (CHWs) are an essential cadre in the health systems of many low- and middle-income countries. These workers provide a wide variety of services and are key to ongoing processes of task shifting within human immunodeficiency virus programmes in particular. Ward-based outreach teams (WBOTs) are South Africa’s latest iteration of the CHW programme and have been introduced as part of the National Department of Health’s Primary Health Care Re-engineering programme. Methods In order to assess the perceived effectiveness of the WBOTs in supporting the ongoing rollout of antiretroviral therapy, tuberculosis care and patient support, we conducted a qualitative investigation focusing on the perceived successes and challenges of the programme among CHWs, community leaders, healthcare workers and community members in the Mopani district, Limpopo province, South Africa. Results The CHW programme operates across these contexts, each associated with its own set of challenges and opportunities. Conclusions While these challenges may be interrelated, a contextual analysis provides a useful means of understanding the programme’s implementation as part of ongoing decision-making processes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-346
Author(s):  
Aubrey L. Doede ◽  
Taylor E. Allen ◽  
JaʼLynn S. Gray ◽  
Austin G. Herbst ◽  
Madala C. Hlungwani ◽  
...  

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Salazar-Austin ◽  
Minja Milovanovic ◽  
Nora S. West ◽  
Molefi Tladi ◽  
Grace Link Barnes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tuberculosis is a top-10 cause of under-5 mortality, despite policies promoting tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT). We previously conducted a cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of symptom-based versus tuberculin skin-based screening on child TPT uptake. Symptom-based screening did not improve TPT uptake and nearly two-thirds of child contacts were not identified or not linked to care. Here we qualitatively explored healthcare provider perceptions of factors that impacted TPT uptake among child contacts. Methods Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants including healthcare providers and administrators who participated in the trial in Matlosana, South Africa. The participants’ experience with symptom-based screening, study implementation strategies, and ongoing challenges with child contact identification and linkage to care were explored. Interviews were systematically coded and thematic content analysis was conducted. Results Participants’ had mixed opinions about symptom-based screening and high acceptability of the study implementation strategies. A key barrier to optimizing child contact screening and evaluation was the supervision and training of community health workers. Conclusions Symptom screening is a simple and effective strategy to evaluate child contacts, but additional pediatric training is needed to provide comfort with decision making. New clinic-based child contact files were highly valued by providers who continued to use them after trial completion. Future interventions to improve child contact management will need to address how to best utilize community health workers in identifying and linking child contacts to care. Trial registration The results presented here were from research related to NCT03074799, retrospectively registered on 9 March 2017.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nireshni Naidoo ◽  
Jean P. Railton ◽  
Sellina N. Khosa ◽  
Nthabiseng Matlakala ◽  
Gert Marincowitz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeleine Ballard ◽  
Carey Westgate ◽  
Rebecca Alban ◽  
Nandini Choudhury ◽  
Rehan Adamjee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite the life-saving work they perform, community health workers (CHWs) have long been subject to global debate about their remuneration. There is now, however, an emerging consensus that CHWs should be paid. As the discussion evolves from whether to financially remunerate CHWs to how to do so, there is an urgent need to better understand the types of CHW payment models and their implications. Methods This study examines the legal framework on CHW compensation in five countries: Brazil, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa. In order to map the characteristics of each approach, a standardized questionnaire was developed and targeted at local law firms. The questionnaire covered legal structures and requirements for compensation of CHWs, CHW compensation mechanisms, CHW legal protections and benefits, and alignment of national CHW policies with global guidelines. Results The five countries profiled represent possible archetypes for CHW compensation: Brazil (public), Ghana (volunteer-based), Nigeria (private), Rwanda (cooperatives with performance based incentives) and South Africa (hybrid public/private). Advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to (i) CHWs, in terms of financial protection, and (ii) the public sector, in terms of ease of implementation, are outlined. Conclusions While a strong legal framework does not necessarily translate into high-quality implementation, it is the first necessary step. While certain approaches to CHW compensation - particularly public-sector or hybrid models with public sector wage floors - best institutionalize recommended CHW protections, political will and long-term financing often remain obstacles. Removing ecosystem barriers - such as multilateral and bilateral restrictions on the payment of salaries - can help governments institutionalize CHW payment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christo Heunis ◽  
Edwin Wouters ◽  
Gladys Kigozi ◽  
Ega Janse van Rensburg-Bonthuyzen ◽  
Nandipha Jacobs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document