scholarly journals Respiratory Muscle Training Reduces Respiratory Complications and Improves Swallowing Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Xie ◽  
Weisong Zhang ◽  
Huijuan Pan ◽  
Ya Zong ◽  
Jixian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Muscle ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Respiratory Muscle Training ◽  
Muscle Training ◽  
Respiratory Complications ◽  
Swallowing Function

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Rocio Martín-Valero ◽  
Ana Maria Jimenez-Cebrian ◽  
Jose A Moral-Munoz ◽  
Maria de-la-Casa-Almeida ◽  
Manuel Rodriguez-Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Respiratory Muscle ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Respiratory Muscle Training ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Muscle Training ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Pilot Studies

Background: Respiratory muscle dysfunction is an important health problem with high morbidity and mortality and associated costs in patients with bronchiectasis (BC). The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of therapeutic respiratory muscle training (RMT) interventions on improving sputum clearance, ventilator function, muscle strength and functional capacity in BC. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Two independent investigators searched using several electronic databases. The methodological quality of nine studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Study selection/eligibility criteria: The following were included: randomised controlled trials, randomised crossover trials and pilot studies of patients with BC that used the intervention as RMT (inspiratory/expiratory) and evaluations of respiratory muscle strength (maximal expiratory pressure/maximal inspiratory pressure). This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017075101). Nine studies were included, five of which obtained an A recommendation grade, three with B, and one with C. Study quality was poor to good (mean PEDro Score of 6.375 out of 10). Studies had small sample sizes (8–98). Results show improvements on PImax in favour of therapeutic respiratory muscle training intervention (MD = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.38, 10.77; p < 0.01; I2 = 92%). However, high heterogeneity was identified on meta-analysis.

Effects of respiratory muscle training in soccer players: a systematic review with a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe León-Morillas ◽  
Martha Cecilia León-Garzón ◽  
María del Mar Martínez-García ◽  
Javier Reina-Abellán ◽  
María Victoria Palop-Montoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Muscle ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Respiratory Muscle Training ◽  
Muscle Training ◽  
Respiratory Muscle Fatigue ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Regular Training

AbstractRespiratory muscle training can improve strength and reduce respiratory muscle fatigue during high-intensity exercise. Little is known about the existing evidence in soccer players. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was performed to analyse the existing evidence on the effects of respiratory muscle training in soccer players. Two independent researchers reviewed 17 databases until July 2019. Inclusion criteria were controlled clinical trials (randomised or not), soccer players (professional or recreational), females and/or males, and respiratory muscle training compared with simulated or regular training groups. The methodological quality and quality of evidence were evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and GRADE score, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the integral meta-analysis 3.3.070. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis was performed for eight variables related to respiratory muscle function, lung function and sports performance. Respiratory muscle training provided a significant improvement compared with simulated or regular training in maximal inspiratory buccal pressure (6 studies, SDM = 0.89; 95 % CI = 0.42, 1.35) and maximum consumption of oxygen (3 studies, SDM = 0.92; 95 % CI = 0.24; 1.61). No significant improvements were observed for other variables. The quality of the evidence was rated as low or very low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document