scholarly journals Review of air disinfection approaches and proposal for thermal inactivation of airborne viruses as a life-style and an instrument to fight pandemics

Author(s):  
Mikhail S. Vlaskin
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050019
Author(s):  
Ali Hasan

Recent concerns raised by the World Health Organization over the Coronavirus raised a worldwide reaction. Governments are racing to contain and stop the Coronavirus from reaching an epidemic/pandemic status. This research presents a way in tracking such a virus or any contagious germ capable of transferring through air specifically where such a transfer can be assisted by a mechanical room ventilation system. Tracking the spread of such a virus is a complicated process, as they can exist in a variety of forms, shapes, sizes, and can change with time. However, a beginning has to be made at some point. Assumptions had to be made based on published scientific data, and standards. The tracking of airborne viruses was carried out on the following assumption (for illustrative purposes); one person with one sneeze in a period of 600 s. The presence of viruses was tracked with curves plotted indicating how long it could take to remove the sneezed viruses from the mechanically ventilated room space. Results gave an indication of what time span is required to remove airborne viruses. Thus, we propose the following: (a) utilizing CFD software as a possible tool in optimizing a mechanical ventilation system in removing contagious viruses. This will track the dispersion of viruses and their removal. The numerical solution revealed that with one typical adult human sneeze, it can take approximately 640 s to reduce an average sneeze of 20,000 droplets to a fifth; (b) upscaling the status of human comfort to a “must have” with regards to the 50% relative humidity, and the use of Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) air disinfection in an epidemic/pandemic condition. A recommendation can be presented to the local authorities of jurisdiction in enforcing the above proposals partially/fully as seen fit as “prevention is better than cure”. This will preclude the spread of highly infectious viruses in mechanically ventilated buildings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-318
Author(s):  
Johannes Knaus ◽  
Petra Vatter ◽  
Martin Hessling

Abstract The ongoing coronavirus pandemic spreads through airborne transmission and is therefore difficult to contain. However, coronaviruses are highly sensitive to UVC, so UVC air disinfection systems should be able to inactivate the virus. Unfortunately, so far there are only few possibilities to test the reduction of airborne viruses or other pathogens. A special test rig, which mainly consisted of a nebulizer and an airflow system, was developed to determine the antiviral and antibacterial efficiency of UVC air disinfection systems. In the assessment of such an UVC air disinfection system with nebulized Staphylococcus carnosus and a sampling period of 30 minutes, a mean bactericidal reduction of 3.70 log10 (99.98 %) was determined. For antiviral irradiation of the coronavirus surrogate phi6 a mean viral load reduction of 1.18 log10 (93.40 %) was observed after a sampling period of 10 minutes. Therefore, mobile UVC air disinfection systems could be applied in hospitals, retirement and nursing homes.


1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 594-595
Author(s):  
BEATRICE WHITING
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-68
Author(s):  
Jane L. Winer
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 907-908
Author(s):  
Lucia Albino Gilbert
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Clark ◽  
David B. Abrams ◽  
Raymond S. Niaura ◽  
Cheryl A. Eaton ◽  
Joseph S. Rossi
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Víctor M. Ruiz ◽  
Carmen Berrocal Montiel ◽  
Alicia E. López ◽  
Teresa Rivas
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document