Evaluating real-world emissions of light-duty gasoline vehicles with deactivated three-way catalyst converters

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Zheng ◽  
Ye Wu ◽  
Shaojun Zhang ◽  
Liqiang He ◽  
Jiming Hao
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 8968-8979
Author(s):  
Tanzila Khan ◽  
H. Christopher Frey ◽  
Nikhil Rastogi ◽  
Tongchuan Wei

Author(s):  
H. Christopher Frey ◽  
Maryam Delavarrafiee ◽  
Sanjam Singh

There are few data on differences in real-world emissions by in-use vehicles when they operate on freeway ramps compared with operations on the freeway itself. The objective of this paper is to quantify the variability in link-based emissions rates for on-ramps and off-ramps in comparison to rates on freeways. Real-world measurements were made with the use of a portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) for selected vehicles, ramps, and freeway segments. The methodology included development of a study design for field data collection of vehicle activity and emissions, execution of the study design, quality assurance of the raw data, and analysis of the quality-assured data. Four light-duty gasoline vehicles were driven on two routes, each composed of on-ramp, freeway, and off-ramp links. Data were collected for morning peak, evening peak, and off-peak time periods. A PEMS test was used to measure exhaust emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), hydrocarbon (HC), and carbon monoxide (CO). The emissions rates for on-ramps were shown to be substantially higher than rates on freeways for NOx, HC, and CO. Some of this variability in emissions rates can be explained by link average vehicle specific power, which can vary by time of day and from one location to another. The variability in emissions rates by route and time of day indicates that there can be complex interactions between traffic flow, road geometry, and emissions rates. Recommendations are offered for additional study and regarding how these results can be used by researchers and practitioners.


Author(s):  
Tanzila Khan ◽  
H. Christopher Frey

With more stringent U.S. fuel economy (FE) standards, the effect of auxiliary devices such as air-conditioning (AC) have received increased attention. AC is the largest auxiliary engine load for light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs). However, there are few data regarding the effect of AC operation on FE for LDGVs based on real-world measurements, especially for recent model year vehicles. The Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) is a regulatory model for estimating on-road vehicle energy-use and emissions. MOVES adjusts vehicle energy-use rates for AC effects. However, MOVES-predicted FE with AC has not been evaluated based on empirical measurements. The research objectives are to quantify the LDGVs FE penalty from AC and assess the accuracy of MOVES2014a-predicted FE with AC. The AC effect on real-world fleet-average FE was quantified based on 78 AC-off vehicles versus 55 AC-on vehicles, measured with onboard instruments on defined study routes. MOVES2014a-based FE penalty from AC was evaluated based on real-world estimates and chassis dynamometer-based FE test results used for FE ratings. The real-world FE penalty ranges between 1.3% and 7.5% among a wide range of driving cycles. Fuel consumption at idle is 13% higher with AC on. MOVES underestimates the real-world FE with AC by 6%, on average. MOVES overestimates the AC effect on cycle-average FE ranging between 13.5% and 18.5% for real-world and MOVES default cycles, and between 11.1% and 14.5% for standard cycles.


Author(s):  
Meng Lyu ◽  
Xiaofeng Bao ◽  
Yunjing Wang ◽  
Ronald Matthews

Vehicle emissions standards and regulations remain weak in high-altitude regions. In this study, vehicle emissions from both the New European Driving Cycle and the Worldwide harmonized Light-duty driving Test Cycle were analyzed by employing on-road test data collected from typical roads in a high-altitude city. On-road measurements were conducted on five light-duty vehicles using a portable emissions measurement system. The certification cycle parameters were synthesized from real-world driving data using the vehicle specific power methodology. The analysis revealed that under real-world driving conditions, all emissions were generally higher than the estimated values for both the New European Driving Cycle and Worldwide harmonized Light-duty driving Test Cycle. Concerning emissions standards, more CO, NOx, and hydrocarbons were emitted by China 3 vehicles than by China 4 vehicles, whereas the CO2 emissions exhibited interesting trends with vehicle displacement and emissions standards. These results have potential implications for policymakers in regard to vehicle emissions management and control strategies aimed at emissions reduction, fleet inspection, and maintenance programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document