Angular and impact energy dependence of intensity ratio of Kα,β x-rays to underneath bremsstrahlung radiation emitted from 15 to 25 keV electrons incident on a pure thick Cu (Z=29) target

2019 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 126-131
Author(s):  
Bhupendra Singh ◽  
Suman Prajapati ◽  
B.K. Singh ◽  
R. Shanker
2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Vattuone ◽  
L. Savio ◽  
M. Rocca ◽  
L. Rumiz ◽  
A. Baraldi ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 569-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thedchanamoorthy ◽  
G.J. McCarthy

AbstractXRD analysis of fly ash was quantitated using the Reference Intensity Ratio (RIR) method and rutile (TiO2) as an internal standard. Rutile RIR's for 15 of the crystalline phases commonly observed in North American fly ash were determined. Error analysis on the various steps in quantitation indicated that precision ranged from ±10% of the amount present for phases that diffract x-rays strongly to ±21% for weakly diffracting phases. Limit of detection in the mostly glassy fly ashes ranged from 0.2% for lime, the most strongly diffracting phase, to 3.5% for weakly diffracting mullite. Accuracy evaluated with a simulated fly ash was within the limits established by precision, but in actual fly ash samples, accuracy will be a function of the match between the crystallinity and composition of the analyte and the analyte standard. Overlaps among peaks of some of the important phases require intensity proportioning; for this reason, the method is best described as semi-quantitative.


2019 ◽  
Vol 187 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-460
Author(s):  
J H D Wong ◽  
M Bakhsh ◽  
Y Y Cheah ◽  
W L Jong ◽  
J S Khor ◽  
...  

Abstract This study characterises and evaluates an Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosemeter (OSLD) system, commercially known as the nanoDot™ dosemeter and the InLight® microStar reader, for personal and in vivo dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. The system characteristics, such as dose linearity, reader accuracy, reproducibility, batch homogeneity, energy dependence and signal stability, were explored. The suitability of the nanoDot™ dosemeters was evaluated by measuring the depth dose curve, in vivo dose measurement and image perturbation. The nanoDot™ dosemeters were observed to produce a linear dose with ±2.8% coefficient variation. Significant batch inhomogeneity (8.3%) was observed. A slight energy dependence (±6.1%) was observed between 60 and 140 kVp. The InLight® microStar reader demonstrated good accuracy and a reproducibility of ±2%. The depth dose curve measured using nanoDot™ dosemeters showed slightly lower responses than Monte Carlo simulation results. The total uncertainty for a single dose measurement using this system was 11%, but it could be reduced to 9.2% when energy dependence correction was applied.


1964 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Toussaint ◽  
G. Vos

A method is presented for the determination of carbon in solid hydrocarbons using the intensity ratio of incoherent to coherent scattering of x-rays. The method is very rapid with precision at the 95% confidence level of about ±0.3%. The minimum sample weight necessary is 0 2 g. Analysis of samples by the x-ray method shows good agreement with values obtained by microcombustion. Finally a general comparison between different methods for carbon determination in solid hydrocarbons is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document