scholarly journals Healthy Hip Joints Have Different Macroscopic and Microscopic Capsular Nerve Architecture Compared With Hips With Osteoarthritis, Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome, and Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e269-e276
Author(s):  
Carlos J. Meheux ◽  
Takashi Hirase ◽  
David Dong ◽  
Terry A. Clyburn ◽  
Joshua D. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Hip Joints ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Surgery is no more effective than conservative treatment for Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552096669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robson Massi Bastos ◽  
Jorge Geraldo de Carvalho Júnior ◽  
Suellen Aline Martinez da Silva ◽  
Shirley Ferreira Campos ◽  
Matheus Vieira Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Quality Evidence

Objective: To summarize the effects of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the short, medium, and long term. Study Design: Systematic review Methods: The following databases were searched on 14/09/2020: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and PEDro. There were no date or language limits. The methodological quality assessment was performed using the PEDro scale and the quality of the evidence followed the GRADE recommendation. The outcomes pain, disability, and adverse effects were extracted. Results: Of 6264 initial studies, three met the full-text inclusion criteria. All studies were of good methodological quality. Follow up ranged from six months to two years, with 650 participants in total. The meta-analyses found no difference in disability between surgical versus conservative treatment, with a mean difference (MD) between groups of 3.91 points (95% CI –2.19 to 10.01) at six months, MD of 5.53 points (95% CI –3.11 to 14.16) at 12 months and 3.8 points (95% CI –6.0 to 13.6) at 24 months. The quality of the evidence (GRADE) varied from moderate to low across all comparisons. Conclusion: There is moderate-quality evidence that surgical treatment is not superior to conservative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the short term, and there is low-quality evidence that it is not superior in the medium term. Level of evidence: Therapy, level 1a. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019134118

scholarly journals Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Lindman ◽  
Sarantos Nikou ◽  
Axel Öhlin ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Olufemi Ayeni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the trends in the literature regarding surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to present which patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs) and surgical approaches are included. Methods This systematic review was conducted with the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, covering studies from 1999 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies with surgical treatment for FAIS, the use of PROMs as evaluation tool and studies in English. Exclusion criteria were studies with patients < 18 years, cohorts with < 8 patients, studies with primarily purpose to evaluate other diagnoses than FAIS and studies with radiographs as only outcomes without using PROMs. Data extracted were author, year, surgical intervention, type of study, level of evidence, demographics of included patients, and PROMs. Results The initial search yielded 2,559 studies, of which 196 were included. There was an increase of 2,043% in the number of studies from the first to the last five years (2004–2008)—(2016–2020). There were 135 (69%) retrospective, 55 (28%) prospective and 6 (3%) Randomized Controlled Trials. Level of evidence ranged from I-IV where Level III was most common (44%). More than half of the studies (58%) originated from USA. Arthroscopic surgery was the most common surgical treatment (85%). Mean follow-up was 27.0 months (± 17 SD), (range 1.5–120 months). Between 1–10 PROMs were included, and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was most commonly used (61%). Conclusion There has been a continuous increase in the number of published studies regarding FAIS with the majority evaluating arthroscopic surgery. The mHHS remains being the most commonly used PROM.

scholarly journals Lower limb biomechanics in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 566-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G King ◽  
Peter R Lawrenson ◽  
Adam I Semciw ◽  
Kane J Middleton ◽  
Kay M Crossley
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Joint Torque ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Joint Torques ◽  
Everyday Activities ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Objective(1) Identify differences in hip and pelvic biomechanics in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) compared with controls during everyday activities (eg, walking, squatting); and (2) evaluate the effects of interventions on hip and pelvic biomechanics during everyday activities.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesMedline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus and SPORTDiscus until February 2017.MethodsPrimary aim: studies that investigated hip or pelvic kinematics and/or joint torques of everyday activities in patients with FAIS compared with the asymptomatic contralateral limb or a control group. Secondary aim: studies that evaluated effects of conservative or surgical interventions on patients with FAIS using pre-post or controlled clinical trial designs. Biomechanical data must have been collected using three-dimensional motion capture devices. Reporting quality was assessed using the Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument and data were pooled (standardised mean difference (SMD), 95% CI) where populations and primary outcomes were similar.ResultsFourteen studies were included (11 cross-sectional and three pre/post intervention), varying between low and moderate reporting quality. Patients with FAIS walked with a lower: peak hip extension angle (SMD −0.40, 95% CI −0.71 to −0.09), peak internal rotation angle (−0.67, 95% CI −1.19 to −0.16) and external rotation joint torque (−0.71, 95% CI −1.07 to −0.35), and squatted to a lesser depth with no difference in hip flexion range. Pre/post intervention data were limited in number and quality, and to surgical cohorts.ConclusionThis review suggests that patients with FAIS may demonstrate hip biomechanical impairments during walking and squatting, with minimal literature available to comment on other tasks.Clinical relevanceThe information presented in the review provides insight into the biomechanical differences associated with FAIS; however, the between-group differences were small to moderate. This information may aid in the development of management strategies for people with the condition.PROSPEROregistration numberCRD42016038677.

scholarly journals The impact of mental health disorders on outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair G Dick ◽  
Christian Smith ◽  
Marcus J K Bankes ◽  
Marc George
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Mental Health Disorders ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Health Disorders ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) has been shown to be beneficial in the short- to medium-term though outcomes vary between individuals. Multiple factors have been suggested to affect outcomes including pre-operative mental health disorders. We undertook a systematic review to assess the evidence relating to the effect of pre-existing mental health disorders on the outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAI. Following PRISMA guidelines, a multi-database search was undertaken using three key concepts: ‘mental health’, ‘FAI’ and ‘hip arthroscopy’. Results were screened and data extracted from relevant studies. A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria including 2248 hips, all published between 2017 and 2019. All studies were of evidence level III or IV with reasonable methodological quality. One study demonstrated pre-operative depression to be related to altered pain reduction in the short-term following surgery. Three studies reported inferior outcomes in the medium-term (1–2 years) in those with worse mental health. One study demonstrated an increased risk of persistent pain 2 years following surgery and one a reduced chance of returning to active military service following surgery in those with worse mental health. Despite inferior outcomes individuals with mental health disorders did still benefit from surgery in general. In conclusion, the presence of pre-existing poor mental health is associated with inferior outcomes in the medium-term following arthroscopic surgery for FAI. Surgeons should consider screening patients for mental health disorders before surgery and counselling them appropriately as to the potential for less satisfactory surgical outcomes.

Can We Identify Why Athletes Fail to Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652095629
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Weber ◽  
Ioanna K. Bolia ◽  
Cory K. Mayfield ◽  
Hansel Ihn ◽  
Hyunwoo P. Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
High Level

Background: No previous systematic review has focused on the athletes who fail to return to sport after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Purpose: To review the literature on the athletes who fail to return to sport after hip arthroscopy for FAIS to determine the rate of nonreturning athletes and explore the reasons for their inability to return to sport after arthroscopic FAI surgery. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Three electronic databases were searched for eligible articles. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles using prespecified criteria. Eligible articles were those that clearly stated the rate of athletes who did not return to sport after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Data collected were the rate of patients who did not return to sport, the level of competition (high level, recreational, or mixed), the type of sport, comments on patients who did not return to sport, the rate of subsequent hip surgeries (total hip replacement or revision hip arthroscopy) in nonreturning athletes, and the reported reason for not returning to sport. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Results: Twenty studies were eligible for inclusion, and 1093 athletes were analyzed. The weighted rate of athletes who did not return to sport after hip arthroscopy for FAIS was 12.1% (95% CI, 7.7-17.4). Only 2 studies (2/20;10%) reported the age of the athletes who did not return, while sex was reported in 3 studies (3/20;15%). The estimated proportion of athletes who did not return to sport because of hip-related issues was significantly greater than the percentage of athletes who did not return for reasons unrelated to their hip (74.3% vs 22.3%; P < .0001). Persistent hip pain was the most commonly reported factor (52/110 patients; 47.2%) associated with failure to return to sport. Whether the nonreturning athletes underwent any subsequent hip procedure after hip arthroscopy for FAIS was reported in only 4 out of 20 studies (20%). There was evidence of publication bias and study heterogeneity. Conclusion: The estimated rate of athletes who did not return to sport after hip arthroscopy for FAIS was 12%, with the majority of athletes being unable to return because of persistent hip pain. There is a severe lack of evidence on the athlete characteristics and clinical course of the nonreturning athletes, and the rate of subsequent hip procedures is unknown. The outcomes and reasons for athletes not returning to sport should be reported in detail to improve patient care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document